General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm a gay dood, Josh Dugarrs is among the most disgusting slimeballs in human history..
Fully indoctrinated by his slimeball parents, Jim Bob and Michelle are Christian homophobic bigots..
His family's church is equally to blame..
A few of the Duggars children have walked away from the family cult-like religion with anti-feminist and anti-gay bigotry being cited as a cause for their awakening..
(PARENTS)Jim Bob and Michelle..
built their following using gay people as their "cross" to propagandize hatred. Fuel vs the fire to propagate their growing fight AGAINST gay rights.
Do gay people have the track record of Josh Duggars? Do we(gays) really "rape" children, like Josh Duggars?
Do we trade child porn like Josh Duggars? There may be some gay criminals but did they ever take a moral high ground?
Does our(gay folks) religion encourage the rape of children the way Jim Bob and Michelle's Christian religion encouraged Josh?
Get'em while they're young, is the mode. The operating strategy of these sick fucks.
On my best day, I couldn't be as sick as a fuck as the Duggars family.
To think, I can't marry my gay partner because of the belief system propagated by Josh Duggars.
Fuck his religion and everything it stands for.
Is it time for child services to investigate Jim Bob and Michelle? WTF are they teaching their children?
Make an example.
As a gay "dood", Josh Duggars scares me.
His brainwashing comes from his parents and their cult-like religion.
edit: The word "dood" is an intentional mis-spelling/slang of the word dude among the gay community..
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)No one ever told me.
dawg day
(7,947 posts)The "quiverfuls" as they are called, wear out the mothers with the constant childbearing, and the older daughters do most of the care and are often kept uneducated so that they can't go out on their own.
And the older boys are like little princes of entitlement.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)Treefrog
(4,170 posts)beaglelover
(3,484 posts)Imallin4Joe
(758 posts)This topic is under assault by the authoritarians that hate gay people and any advance of gay rights(not by gay rights advocates by decent people, like you!!)
Trump and Pence knew that..
Part of stacking the USSC with right-wing justices like Amy Coney Barret was to reverse earlier USSC decisions that favored gay rights with homophobic decisions that later strike down pro-gay-rights decisions..
they garner favor within their own party while letting the USSC do the actual policy-making.
Let the courts decide instead of making themselves look like bigots.
FreeState
(10,572 posts)And as a 50 year old gay man I have never heard or seen dood used before. But then again I couldnt tell you what the top songs are on the radio
demigoddess
(6,641 posts)Imallin4Joe
(758 posts)and we can share tea, coffee, wine etc. Your beverage of choice!
Too bad that the rest of the world can't be as hospitable and tolerant.
Thanks for the reply. You'd make a great neighbor!
Collimator
(1,639 posts)(He's comfortable with that word.) And another Gay friend who is kind of prissy like me (I'm okay with being called a prude, btw. It's a least part of my truth.) The second friend would like to connect and be part of the Gay community but most of what he sees vis a vis the sexual mores has put him off, so he is actually more comfortable with fairly liberal church communities. (The ones that he frequents didn't have a specific Gay outreach the last time that we spoke.)
Then, there is that one guy who founded NAMBY -an organization dedicated to "Man/Boy Love". (I am a little uncertain about what I am writing here, but I am kind of scared to Google it, tbh.) Whereas most of the Gay people that I know are vehemently opposed to sexual activity between adults and anyone underage.
So, Gay folk run the gamut--which is to be expected because they are people. And people whose principal drivers are the suppression of any other person's truth and their enjoyment of elemental rights are the biggest problem in the world right now, even if they aren't secretly abusing others and are actually living "up" to their self-imposed standards. Anytime one's primary standard is that there is only one "right" way to be and to live and to love, and they think they can enforce that standard by changing laws to make other peoples' lives more difficult--that is the only true obscene practice.
Imallin4Joe
(758 posts)slut is kinda seen as a straight term. A term used to oppress women for their own sexual liberation.
So we roll with the term "PIG".
Hilarious in its connotation. Easy to identify with.
Few gay people identify with this term but it's the straight equivalent to a "slut".
So, your friend is a pig...
Call him/her that and watch the ensuing laughter. It's true, we all learn something new every day.
TheBlackAdder
(28,199 posts).
In both cases, dude & slut, the u is replaced with a double-o.
.
Imallin4Joe
(758 posts)We all learn something new or some new concept every day!!
Also on edit: I don't want this reply to sound insulting. Just sayin, that's a new term to me and I love it!
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)And pedophilia has nothing to do with being gay.
Collimator
(1,639 posts)As I indicated, I was a bit wary about doing an internet search for fear of heading down some unexpected website rabbit hole.
I do not dispute your assertion. And I had hoped that I made that point clear. In the article that I remember reading many years past, the fellow who had started the organization, (identified by whichever initials) wanted to legalize and de-stigmatize sexual relationships between adult men and underage males.
He was roundly criticized. The moral objections came from all sides, and many Gay rights advocates were additionally concerned that mainstream straight society would wrongly assume that Gay people supported that man's views.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Pure and simple.
ShazzieB
(16,398 posts)It stands for North American Man/Boy Love Association. I just googled it in an incognito tab (because I don't want that shit in my search history) to make sure I was remembering the name correctly, so I can report that it still seems to be around, and yes, it's just as gross as it sounds. Your recollection of their aims was quite accurate.
Celerity
(43,369 posts)Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Celerity
(43,369 posts)I can forgive a lot, but raping children is where one of my lines is drawn.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,199 posts)canetoad
(17,160 posts)The Duggars have now - 17? 18? Chances are one or more of them is doomed to a closeted life.
Imallin4Joe
(758 posts)I wonder if any of the Duggars kids are gay and the oppression they deal with if so.
Thanks for bringing it up.
ShazzieB
(16,398 posts)Not for lack of effort. She miscarried no. 20. No more pregnancies after that.
And yes, I know way too much about those people. What can I say, I used to watch the show every now and then, just for a freak show fix.
Don't feel bad. Their choice to make a spectacle of their reproductive habits.