Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WHITT

(2,868 posts)
Fri Apr 30, 2021, 07:52 PM Apr 2021

Update #3 @ 'Operation Dump Cuomo'

RE: NY Attorney General Cuomo Investigation

First, Hat Tip to brooklynite, who posted the original article more than two weeks ago. [link:https://www.democraticunderground.com/100215328664|


Notice the delineation within this excerpt:

James said at the time of the appointments in early March that the work "will be comprised of — but not limited to — issuing subpoenas and related compliance; examination of relevant documents and records; interviews, including formal depositions; and analysis of data and information pertinent to the investigation."


Remember how a number prior posters had insisted that OF COURSE everyone would be under oath?

APPARENTLY NOT.


Let's remember that Charlotte Bennett:

1) Refused to file a present day police report, even though she has accused Cuomo of criminal felonies.

2) Refused to cooperate with the legislative investigation, because they wanted her testimony to be under oath.

3) And Special Counsel to the Governor, Beth Garvey, after a thorough debriefing of Bennett's 'accusations', stated that Bennett made no claims of physical contact or inappropriate sexual conduct.

If Bennett made the same 'accusations' during an 'interview' with AG James investigators, they may have found no need for a formal deposition, as there was no there there.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Update #3 @ 'Operation Dump Cuomo' (Original Post) WHITT Apr 2021 OP
Wow it looks like some people are just lying about Cuomo uponit7771 Apr 2021 #1
Welp! That sure was a bust 👀 Budi Apr 2021 #2
Are you saying the investigation is over? /nt tonedevil Apr 2021 #3
Of Course Not WHITT May 2021 #4

WHITT

(2,868 posts)
4. Of Course Not
Sat May 1, 2021, 12:23 AM
May 2021

This is in reference to a previous thread where many were pointing out that Bennet was refusing to testify under oath (among other things) and some were claiming she would most certainly would have been under oath because it was an AG investigation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Update #3 @ 'Operation Du...