Thu May 6, 2021, 11:14 AM
JuJuChen (1,969 posts)
BITEGHAZI/DOG-GATE (not the Onion)
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/biting-biden-dogs/
(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the United States Department of Homeland Security for records of communication between Secret Service officials assigned to the White House regarding the Biden family dogs (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (No. 1:21-cv-01194)).
|
7 replies, 1085 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
JuJuChen | May 2021 | OP |
LetMyPeopleVote | May 2021 | #1 | |
mahatmakanejeeves | May 2021 | #7 | |
gratuitous | May 2021 | #2 | |
JuJuChen | May 2021 | #3 | |
Tommy Carcetti | May 2021 | #4 | |
getagrip_already | May 2021 | #5 | |
OAITW r.2.0 | May 2021 | #6 |
Response to JuJuChen (Original post)
Thu May 6, 2021, 11:16 AM
LetMyPeopleVote (126,894 posts)
1. Larry Klayman needs to be disbarred
Response to LetMyPeopleVote (Reply #1)
Thu May 6, 2021, 12:09 PM
mahatmakanejeeves (51,105 posts)
7. This is their other whackadoodle, Tom Fitton.
Judicial Watch announced that it filed a FOIA lawsuit against the United States Department of Homeland Security for records of communication between Secret Service officials assigned to the White House regarding the Biden family dogs. READ: http://jwatch.us/4c2h3F Link to tweet |
Response to JuJuChen (Original post)
Thu May 6, 2021, 11:17 AM
gratuitous (80,559 posts)
2. No surprise
Republicans launched an investigation over Socks the cat during the Clinton administration, wanting to know if any public money had been spent on mailing holiday cards to kids who had signed up. So this is totally on brand for Judicial Watch.
|
Response to JuJuChen (Original post)
Thu May 6, 2021, 11:18 AM
JuJuChen (1,969 posts)
3. We paid for that folks.
Response to JuJuChen (Original post)
Thu May 6, 2021, 11:19 AM
Tommy Carcetti (42,057 posts)
4. Sadly, this is not even unprecedented.
https://mashable.com/2017/06/04/socks-the-cat-gop-investigation/
Remember when House Republicans went after Socks the cat?
Republicans seem a bit investigation-shy these days, don't they? Well, as you might remember from election season, that wasn't always the case. During Bill Clinton's administration, House Republicans even called for an inquiry into Socks, the First Cat. Socks was a fairly normal cat, and by most accounts, he seemed to be a good and cute boy. Adopted by Chelsea Clinton as a lost kitten, he enjoyed the things that most cats do: catnip (which press photographers used to lure him closer on the White House lawn), skulking around the grounds, and loathing his canine counterpart, Buddy the dog. So what was Socks's crime? For Indiana GOP representative Dan Burton, Socks himself wasn't the issue. The problem was that constituents liked Socks — so much, in fact, that they were sending him mail. Of course, since most of the letter writers were children, the White House would respond from Socks. And Burton wanted to know why taxpayers were fronting Socks's postage. |
Response to JuJuChen (Original post)
Thu May 6, 2021, 11:44 AM
getagrip_already (10,431 posts)
5. and how many "massages" did taxpayers fund for former guy?
His pets are much more expensive.
|
Response to JuJuChen (Original post)
Thu May 6, 2021, 11:48 AM
OAITW r.2.0 (18,615 posts)
6. Judicial Watch - Harassing Democratic Presidents since 1992.
Another frivolous lawsuit and waste of taxpayer dollars.
|