General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPoe's law. Removal of posts. Sarcasm/satire/parody.
Last edited Sun May 9, 2021, 01:06 AM - Edit history (1)
Poe's law. Removal of posts. Sarcasm/satire/parody.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law
Poe's law is an adage of Internet culture stating that, without a clear indicator of the author's intent, it is impossible to create a parody of extreme views so obviously exaggerated that it cannot be mistaken by some readers for a sincere expression of the views being parodied.[1][2][3] The original statement, by Nathan Poe, read:[1]
Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article.
Similar to Murphy's Law, Poe's Law concerns internet debates, particularly regarding religion or politics.
---------------------------------------
Was it too subtle?
Sometimes I have had posts removed because the s/s/p was not recognized. Sometimes I have been able to get the removal reversed by pointing it out.
The emoji can be crucial.
multigraincracker
(32,737 posts)Brother Mythos
(1,442 posts)Bongo Prophet
(2,651 posts)SaveOurDemocracy
(4,400 posts)egduj
(807 posts)Paladin
(28,280 posts)And yes, there's a modest amount of sarcasm in that title statement.
edhopper
(33,646 posts)because I said the Republican Southern States are bad for the country.
Apparently that is "bashing"
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)So sorry to hear.
edhopper
(33,646 posts)But is saying the Southern States have had a negative effect on our country politically really "bashing a group"?
By this logic if we substitute "GOP" for "Southern States" it should likewise be removed.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Jmo.
HAB911
(8,922 posts)but I am now in danger of a ban because saying the Southern States have had a negative political effect on our country is considered "bashing".
HAB911
(8,922 posts)many want to be the victim it seems. I'm a southerner, born and raised in Georgia, worked the entire SE since 1968, lived in Florida for the past 48 years and anyone that thinks your statement is bashing, is deluded. But the Confederacy lives on.
edhopper
(33,646 posts)so I hear you. Thanks for the support.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Surely you can see that? Read where the lovely folks who brought us January 6 hail from.
Hekate
(90,913 posts)...or facial expression.
Whiskeytide
(4,463 posts)... sarcasm tag is an affront to sarcasm. I agree.
TomSlick
(11,118 posts)The world has gotten so nutty that is is often difficult to recognize sarcasm.
When I think my sarcasm should be clear, I will nevertheless include:
"To the extent needed, "
hunter
(38,339 posts)UTUSN
(70,765 posts)can react badly. One of my mother's references was "reading between the lines," which some people don't do.
Ka-Dinh Oy
(11,686 posts)I grew up with sarcasm so recognizing it is easy for me. Just need to know who you are being sarcastic with.