Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

aggiesal

(8,900 posts)
Wed May 12, 2021, 11:52 AM May 2021

This morning Stephanie Ruhle made a great point about the CPI ...



The report this morning shows the CPI grew at 2.3% year over year, the most since September 2008, sparking inflation worries.

At this time last year, we were 7+ weeks into a shutdown with no socializing or spending.
Everything came to a grinding halt.

Stephanie Ruhle is smart.
She used the 2019 numbers to compare against the 2021 numbers and this showed that there was little change.

All 2021 numbers will be out of wack when compared to 2020, so we should be using the 2019 numbers.

This is very smart, on her part. I haven't heard anyone else do this.
2020 is an anomaly.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This morning Stephanie Ruhle made a great point about the CPI ... (Original Post) aggiesal May 2021 OP
No. We should not change methods just because we're unhappy with this month's results. mahatmakanejeeves May 2021 #1
It's more realistic ... aggiesal May 2021 #3
kick Dawson Leery May 2021 #2
K&R spanone May 2021 #4
The BLS report states 4.2% year over year, but that is comparing to a temporary dip. Make7 May 2021 #5
Stephanie Ruhle mentioned 4.2% on her show this morning ... aggiesal May 2021 #7
KnR. yonder May 2021 #6
I had a shock comparing the price of a mutual fund I own. Incredible return from last year. Midnight Writer May 2021 #8
Personally, I believe that 2020 was such an anomaly ... aggiesal May 2021 #9

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,232 posts)
1. No. We should not change methods just because we're unhappy with this month's results.
Wed May 12, 2021, 11:56 AM
May 2021

People understand the concept of long-term trends.

aggiesal

(8,900 posts)
3. It's more realistic ...
Wed May 12, 2021, 12:09 PM
May 2021

I don't know what the CPI was at this point last year, but
I'm willing to bet it was very negative from the previous year.

2020 was an anomaly, we should be using apples to apples, not apples to dried fruit.

Make7

(8,543 posts)
5. The BLS report states 4.2% year over year, but that is comparing to a temporary dip.
Wed May 12, 2021, 12:47 PM
May 2021


If you compare to 2019, it is 2.2% per year. Considering the Federal Reserve has stated in the past that their goal for inflation is 2.0% a year, this doesn't appear to be the problem some are making it out to be.

Prices are going up, but things are still out of whack due to Covid. We probably need things to be closer to normal before drawing conclusions.

aggiesal

(8,900 posts)
7. Stephanie Ruhle mentioned 4.2% on her show this morning ...
Wed May 12, 2021, 01:23 PM
May 2021

but an earlier post on the CPI in this DU forum mentioned 2.3%, so that's what I ran with.

Looking at your chart, I believe Stephanie Ruhle is correct.
Compare it against 2019's numbers.

Midnight Writer

(21,672 posts)
8. I had a shock comparing the price of a mutual fund I own. Incredible return from last year.
Wed May 12, 2021, 02:10 PM
May 2021

Then I realized I was comparing April 1, 2020 with April 1, 2021.

Still a nice return, but putting it in perspective dampened my excitement.

aggiesal

(8,900 posts)
9. Personally, I believe that 2020 was such an anomaly ...
Wed May 12, 2021, 02:13 PM
May 2021

that we should only use 2020 as a point of interest, but
compare against 2019 as a better reading.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This morning Stephanie Ru...