Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

bottomofthehill

(9,353 posts)
3. They were not house republicans.
Wed May 12, 2021, 11:11 AM
May 2021

They were mostly out of office elected, think tank types and talking heads, think Michael Steele

herding cats

(19,996 posts)
5. None of the "100 influential Republicans" who made that statement are seated.
Wed May 12, 2021, 11:14 AM
May 2021
none of the people backing this latest effort are serving as elected Republicans.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/more-100-republican-former-officials-others-seek-reforms-threaten-new-n1267053

I'm not sure what they have planned, but any division in the GOP is always welcome. I wish them luck.

Javaman

(65,415 posts)
10. well, we'll see. saying and doing are miles apart concerning the repukes.
Wed May 12, 2021, 12:29 PM
May 2021

i will commence with the holding of my breath. LOL

NQAS

(10,749 posts)
8. And, one more time. . .
Wed May 12, 2021, 11:54 AM
May 2021

Liz Cheney won't create a third party and will vote party line.

Nice words, to be sure. But I'd put money that her actions don't match up.

Being a Cheney, one might expect quite a lot of behind the scenes activity that will accrue to the country's, and her own, benefit. Time will tell.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»so those 100 repukes that...