General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLife Will Dramatically Change Under Brutal American Oligarchy
Last edited Sat May 15, 2021, 01:40 PM - Edit history (1)
Want some racism, sexism, misogyny, blunt and angry nationalism, and good-old-fashioned corruption with your government?
We just had an example during the four years of the Trump presidency of how this could change everyday life in America, and the election to leadership of Trump acolyte Elise Stefanik shows how many in the Republican Party want to institutionalize it. Its important to understand what it really means.
A lot of names have been bandied around to describe the form of government Donald Trump tried to impose on us during his administration. Fascism was used commonly, as were words like little dictator, and cult of personality.
But really what Donald Trump was proposing and trying to institute is a fairly common form of government, a variation of authoritarianism called oligarchy.
We are seeing it played out around the world in governments controlled by rich elites and run by authoritarians like Duterte, Bolsonaro, Netanyahu, Trump, Putin, Orban, Modi, and Duda.
They seem like they are increasingly becoming one-man-rule governments, but authoritarianism is just the midpoint after oligarchs begin corrupting democratic governments and have not yet become full-blown fascist oligarchies.
Because they are rarely stable, these midpoint authoritarian governments usually are grown in, and rise up to seize control of democracies, as has happened several times in the Philippines, for example, where the biggest businesses are inextricably intertwined with the state, corruption is rampant, and the media, the courts and the legislature are all essentially under the control of the billionaire or oligarchic class.
Oligarchy is when the very rich rule a country largely for their own benefit. They typically bring along a charismatic but compliant leader at the top (often an oligarch himself, and if he doesnt start out that way he certainly ends that way), and are supported at the bottom by authoritarian followers who feel insecure about their personal and economic prospects and want a big daddy who will soothe their anxieties, affirm their victimhood and outrage, and help them sleep at night.
Oligarchy is always the result of very wealthy people corrupting the political process, something the Founders thought they could control in America but that political philosopher Robert Michaels, with his Iron Law of Oligarchy in 1911, proposed was the inevitable result of every democracy that didnt maintain strong guardrails to prevent the rich from rising up and corrupting the political process.
This corruption of politics is exactly what has happened in the United States since the late 1970s when the Supreme Court ruled (in their Buckley and Bellotti decisions in 1976/1978) that billionaires and corporations owning politicians was merely First Amendment-protected free speech. It brought us the Reagan Revolution.
They doubled down on this in 2010 with their Citizens United ruling, saying that if government prevented billionaires and giant corporations from overwhelming elections with their money and advertising, we were not just inhibiting their free speech.
The conservative justices on the Court invented a bizarre new doctrine to justify Citizens United, saying that average people were being disadvantaged when billionaires and corporations couldnt pour unlimited money into the political process because if they were stifled wed lose our right to listen to some of the most important and well-informed players in the economic and political game.
This right to listen is now, in our political process, the Supreme Court-created foundation of oligarchic control over the Republican Party, diminishing parts of the Democratic Party, and, increasingly, over that we refer to as Red States.
Authoritarian movements, as the Republican Party has recently become, typically have a few predictable hallmarks. They include:
Crushing the rights of women while glorifying a macho ethic and aesthetic
Crony capitalism, making a few rich and screwing everybody else
Crushing union efforts and any sort of demands by workers for fair pay or treatment
The legalization and widespread promulgation of the surveillance state while political elites routinely get away with crimes that would have put average people into prison for years
Repression of religious minorities and weaponization of religion as an agent of state power
The suppression typically starting with the demonization of the press; in later stages, outright murder of members of the press
The marginalization and demonization of minorities, particularly racial and gender-based minorities
Selective enforcement of laws so that individuals never know when they will become the target of state violence (example: how America polices Black people)
Seizure of the courts so that selectively enforced laws and regulations are used to maintain the power of the oligarchs and assuage the insecurities of their followers
A huge gap between the rich and poor (often accompanied by an explosion of homelessness), maintained and used by the oligarch class to provide victims their followers can feel superior to
The racialization of powerlessness and poverty
A brutal grassroots response to those who object to selective poverty, typically leading to the marginalization or even outright assassination of movement leaders (like Dr. Martin Luther King)
A false form of nationalism that glorifies a mythical past, explicitly covers up past crimes and failings, and positions the now-oligarch-controlled country as the pinnacle of political evolution
The corruption of the political process, so that the agents of the oligarchs can ultimately decide who gets to vote and who doesnt, and which votes get counted and which dont
Countries typically begin the transition from democracy into oligarchy and sometimes even outright fascism when the oligarchs seize control of a large part of the political process, typically a major political party.
This has happened in the United States over the past 40 years under the rubric of the Reagan Revolution. The Republican Party is now entirely controlled by the oligarch class, who also have functional control over as many as half of the individual members of the Democratic Party.
Slowing down or even reversing Americas slide into oligarchy will require a number of things the Biden administration has put forward.
We must show that democratic government can actually still work, reducing the demand for a strongman savior like we saw with Trump, and the passage of the expansive American Rescue Plan was a good start.
If Biden can get both his American Jobs Plan and American Families Plan enacted, rebuilding our physical, human and intellectual infrastructure, it will take a lot of wind out of the sails of the authoritarian movement in this country.
By proposing HR1, the For The People Act, the Democratic Party has chosen to explicitly repudiate oligarchy as a form of government. It requires transparency from big money and meaningfully reduces its influence, as well as ending minority-rule schemes like gerrymandering while establishing baseline minimum standards for elections in America.
By holding democracy high as a primary value, the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act guarantees and expands democracy itself in America, which can rapidly and effectively kneecap oligarchy.
The success or failure of these initiatives all fiercely opposed by the GOP and the oligarchs who own that Party will determine whether America again embraces democracy, or picks back up on Donald Trumps nearly-successful move to push America into a full-blown fascistic form of oligarchy.
The stakes are higher than theyve been since the 1860s and the 1930s; this may be our last chance to rescue democracy in this country.
----------------------------------------------------------
If youd like to do a deeper dive on these topics, Ive written a series of small, quickly-read books breaking them down.
The Hidden History of Guns and the Second Amendment describes that Amendments roots in the Southern Slave Patrols and how American policing grew out of that and is used today as a violent system of control against marginalized people.
The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America lays out how a corruptly-stacked Supreme Court is the principal instrument that brought us here.
The Hidden History of the War on Voting describes the processes through which oligarchs corrupted the Republican Party and the American political system.
The Hidden History of Monopolies describes how the oligarchic class, exploiting weaknesses within our political system, managed to seize control of virtually our entire economy, giving them massive political power.
The Hidden History of American Oligarchy reveals the two previous times in this country when we almost tipped over into oligarchy [the Civil War era and the attempts to overthrow Franklin Roosevelt] and exposes oligarch efforts to pull it off again today and how we can stop them.
And The Hidden History of American Healthcare shows how the most important and central function of government maintaining the health and well-being of its people has been co-opted and seized by a small group of healthcare oligarchs and how a Medicare For All system can overthrow much of their power and end their plunder of the American middle class.
All are available through your favorite bookseller.
Original post with links at: HartmannReport.com
dalton99a
(94,115 posts)Yes, Dorothy, it could happen here. And almost did.
gab13by13
(32,321 posts)the insurrection didn't end on 1/6.
Dustlawyer
(10,539 posts)Layzeebeaver
(2,286 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(156,619 posts)Elwood P Dowd
(11,453 posts)Buckeyeblue
(6,352 posts)Sadly, there are people who think this type of government would be better for them. Probably because it would keep them from having to think there way through life.
DENVERPOPS
(13,003 posts)politically ignorant I know, often say: "I think for myself, and that is why I am a Republican".........when nothing could be further from the truth than that statement.........
Anytime you hear Anything out of a Republican's mouth it is, without exception:
1) A lie
2) Pure hypocrisy
3) A statement that is 180 degrees from reality......
Klaralven
(7,510 posts)Historically, countries have oscillated between:
- one man rule by a king, emperor, dictator, etc who is generally allied with the lower classes against the middle, or
- rule by an oligarchy based on ownership or hereditary aristocracy.
Democracies have typically been short-lived. Typically, revolution or external conflicts result in their resorting to one-man rule. One-man rule is difficult to perpetuate and power diffuses to an oligarchy over time. Rinse and repeat.
wnylib
(26,014 posts)monarchies are stable. The monarchical system might persist for centuries if people are convinced of the superiority of royal and noble bloodlines, but life under a monarch is not stable. Consider the century long Wars of the Roses in Britain. Or, before that, the fighting between Stephen and Matilda for the English throne. The civil wars over which monarch would rule. All of those situations carried with them long periods of lawlessness, hunger from destroyed agricultural fields, uncertainty about the present and future.
Klaralven
(7,510 posts)The death of Henry V in 1422 ended the rule of the last strong monarch of the Plantagenets. When his 9-month old son Henry VI took the throne, it set the stage for oligarchic rule by contending Barons or the houses of York and Lancaster. Oligarchic rule (and conflict) continued until a strong monarchy was reestablished under Henry VII Tudor in 1485.
wnylib
(26,014 posts)but there was a great amount of social and economic instability as the oligarchs (noble cousins who all descended from Edward III) fought with, imprisoned, and killed each other over which house and which noble would rule. It was a rule of personalities and might rather than law - which is why there were other civil wars after Henry VII, not to mention various peasant revolts.
If by stable, you mean the ability to persist, then yes, monarchies were stable. But the societies that they ruled over were not.
CaptainTruth
(8,200 posts)I've felt like the US was goose-stepping toward fascism under Trump, but the problem is much bigger than that.
Baked Potato
(7,733 posts)ancianita
(43,307 posts)Orban and Duterte. Totalitarianism follows, with enough journalists jailed, killed and weaponized as tools of state propaganda. The People will never be free without information. That coordinated AI and global tech would help fight against such a turn toward oligarchy is a major firewall, imo.
thomhartmann
(3,995 posts)added the press to my list. Don't know how I overlooked that, but wrote this thing this morning entirely from memory... It's the weekend, after all...
ancianita
(43,307 posts)Your thoughts are exactly what got mine going, is all.
spanone
(141,609 posts)👍🏼
Pepsidog
(6,365 posts)Thom I was a Republican voting foe Reagan 2x and Bush next. After that I have been all Democratic. When I found you and Ed Schultz on lefty talk on Sirius I was hooked. You made me aware of so many things like The Powell Memo and how the right has corrupted our process in clear and concise language. Your lunchtime with Bernie was another learning opportunity. Thank you for all you have done. I have passed your knowledge onto my four kids who are now all adults voting for democrats.
thomhartmann
(3,995 posts)keeping in mind that it's the issues, not the personalities, that really matter. This is such a critical time...
DENVERPOPS
(13,003 posts)However, I don't completely agree with the "Oligarchy" title.
Citizens United wasn't written and put in place specifically for the relatively some what limited number of Uber Rich Oligarchs.
It was in fact put in place to give the CORPORATIONS the power.
The simplest text book definition of Fascism, is the merging of Corporations and Government.
I feel that is what is really going on......
We are a hair away from the Repubs installing a Corporate Fascist Tyranny.
If you go down a checklist of what is required to install a Fascist government, it would exactly match what is being done by the Republican Party, especially for the last decade.....
Lonestarblue
(13,480 posts)I forget the exact number, but something like 85% of all stock is owned by the wealthy. They are the people who control the corporations.
DENVERPOPS
(13,003 posts)Dictionary definition of Fascism.............
"Fascism is a system of government led by a dictator who typically rules by forcefully and often violently suppressing opposition and criticism, controlling all industry and commerce, and promoting nationalism and often racism."
I don't disagree with Hartmann, merely wish to add to it. Oligarchs are one thing, Fascism is also a consideration.
Google fascism. Somewhere you will find a list of "steps towards fascism", and it will look like a play book for this new group of Quasi-Republican Politicians..............
Citizens United was directed at giving the CORPORATIONS complete and overwhelming power, and I don't challenge that the Oligarchs had a major influence on the Corporations.......
speaknow
(321 posts)if he has help. One is he would need henchmen to
do his bidding. 2 is he sees the other side as being
weak. With those 2 elements all you need is a
rallying cry to stir up the people, and the cry is
always of hate.
not fooled
(6,680 posts)that many 'Muricans don't understand the potential downside. The oligarchs and corporations hide behind carefully concocted propaganda that deflects attention from the consequences of their rule. The corporate media is worse than useless, concealing and softening the depiction of the overlord class.
If people understood how their choices are limited and costs increased by paying in effect a hidden "tax" on everything we buy because of monopolies and corporate corruption of the political process, their eyes would be opened. But, who--with a big enough microphone--will tell them? Or, when we do get truthtellers like Elizabeth Warren, the populace can be turned against them by pushing idiotic, simpleminded buttons such as "socialism."
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)BadGimp
(4,109 posts)I shared this with my brother suggesting to him that at least it would help him understand where my thinking is it.
All the best,
BadGimp
JCMach1
(29,202 posts)There are elements of oligarchy in most fascist states ... Let's not soften the truth here.
colsohlibgal
(5,276 posts)Were a good way toward this, thank goodness Biden won denying Twitler a chance to really take us further away from democracy.
The right is an increasingly a minority party but because of their institutional advantages they cling to enough power.
Edwcraig
(332 posts)I believe that the greatest threat to our Democracy and our way of life is the emerging power and control of the political processes in America by unrestrained global oligarchs (particularly the Russians and Saudis). In my opinion Trump was and is just their puppet. There is nothing wrong with being wealthy. It is horribly wrong for the greedy and corrupt wealthy to attempt to stamp out Democracy for their own benefit. We must demonize Republicans as being oligarchests as the right demonized the word liberal and then attached it to us.
ymetca
(1,182 posts)But it's never actually been realized. We're stuck with a representative democracy, of sorts, concocted during the buggy-whip/whale oil era, and wholly unsuited to the modern world.
It is theoretically possible to create a global direct democracy, in which each and every "citizen" of the planet has an equal say in ALL laws being passed for everyone. But thousands of years of want and deprivation keep us locked into endless dominance/submission games, false scarcity, excessive hoarding and concentration of wealth and power, hastening toward planetary ecocide.
We can choose to enact a global, egalitarian system in belief there is plenty to go around, or descend further into an apocalyptic, Mad Max Beyond the Thunder Dome, Book of Eli, hell-scape of war, violence and suffering.
We actually need a "New World Order", which is why our psychopathic overlords are so hell-bent on killing that infant of an idea in its manger.
BobTheSubgenius
(12,217 posts)I just hope there is enough people out there that can still think, or care to. The fact that so many millions of people can be not only be convinced to vote against their own interests, but firmly and doggedly convinced does not bode well for a quick recovery from this madness.
Kid Berwyn
(24,395 posts)A new study has found that elites and business interests wield the most political influence.
NBC News, April 19, 2014
By Meredith Clark
Excerpt...
It also found that the preferences of the middle class made essentially no difference to a bills fate.
The central point that emerges from our research is that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while mass-based interest groups and average citizens have little or no independent influence, Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page wrote in the study, titled "Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens."
While Gilens and Page call the state of the current political system economic elite domination, another term could also be used: Oligarchy, otherwise known as a system in which power rests with a small number of economically or politically advantaged people.
The study looked at nearly 1,800 policy issues over a 20-year period between 1982 and 2002. According to their data, when the rich support a policy, it has a 45% chance of becoming law. And when they oppose it, it has only an 18% chance of being enacted.
We believe, the studys authors concluded, that if policymaking is dominated by powerful business organizations and a small number of affluent Americans, then Americas claims to being a democratic society are seriously threatened.
Source: https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/the-us-no-longer-democracy-msna310901
Thom makes an important distinction: we are sliding from Friendly Fascism as defined by Bertran Gross to the malevolent kind advanced by Steve Bannon.
peggysue2
(12,533 posts)I'd suggest watching Netflix's 'Crime of the Century" documentary on the opioid crisis that has ravaged so many American communities. The network of corruption, the perversion of the rule of law and the obscene amount of money extracted from the suffering of others is appalling. And our favorite scoundrels have cameos in the mess: Rudy as an influencer and that former guy as the blind King who promised to provide solutions.
It's sickening at how craven and greedy the so-called elites have become. They willingly addicted others to their product while being addicted to profits themselves. This crisis is a repeat of Big Tobacco on steroids or the ongoing lie about Climate Change by the fossil fuel companies.
Bottom line is: They knew. They always knew. They didn't care.
And when profits were threatened? They bought their way into Congress and had our laws tailored to their greed. They spread the corruption throughout the medical community to do their bidding while crushing those who bucked their authority.
That's what we and the future have to look forward to if this isn't stopped.
Not a pretty picture. These corporations and executives are not people. They're monsters.
ancianita
(43,307 posts)(e.g. the homeless of CA brought about by last year's massive fires, or the thousands at the US border brought about by major crop failure, starvation and resultant predations in the Central American triangle).
David Wallace-Wells posts in Reddit (paraphrased):
-- what obligation is felt between nations,
-- what is owed,
-- what counts as "justice" in this context, and
-- how can we expand our humanitarian feelings to attend to the needs of those with the least? Of course, those are many of the same moral dilemmas posed by global inequality todayonly exacerbated and made more explicit.
https://www.reddit.com/r/collapse/comments/nd0ub6/im_david_wallacewells_climate_alarmist_and_the/
One can watch as they move to control weakened countries hit by climate change, which hits different parts of the world unevenly.
Some oligarchs practice a kind of stealth eco-terrorism, a kind of crime of opportunity, brought about by pandemic or crop failure variously weakening nations.
It sounds simplistic to say that there are good and bad oligarchs, but there are those that differ about the future of humanity.
If we look beyond the political events to more global sources of suffering, we might be seeing the same larger climate dynamics picture that oligarchs see. I think it's important to keep our eyes not just on our dramas and legitimate suffering, and not to be reactive to oligarchs only. There are some without vision and some with. Those will be important allies in mitigating the climate events we're now seeing.