Breaking on M$NBComcast - ReTHUGs will now vote NO tomorrow

[malaise]

against the Commission

[JHB]

1. My Shock&Surprise Meter is pinned at zero.

It's trying to go lower, but the mechanism won't let it.

[NQAS]

2. Then no seats on the commission (nt)

[Arkansas Granny]

3. Hmm. It makes you think they might have something to hide.

[crickets]

11. I like the cut of your jib! nt

[spanone]

4. why would they want to investigate themselves? do it without them...they did benghazi non-stop

[malaise]

18. THIS!

The truth

[spanone]

20. THIRTY THREE BENGHAZI HEARINGS

[leftieNanner]

5. Then the Dems should proceed without them. nt

[uponit7771]

6. +1, they would do this very thing without dems

[area51]

7. +1 n/t

[malaise]

21. They had better

[JustAnotherGen]

8. Not even breaking news

We knew they would do this.

[stillcool]

9. I look forward to not seeing their theatrics....

maybe some truth will come out.

[guillaumeb]

10. Was this ever in doubt, except perhaps for Susan Collins? eom

[bamagal62]

12. Then, we should do investigations

Without them. F-them.

[FalloutShelter]

13. FTA! All complicit now.

Hang it around their necks.

[JohnSJ]

14. The house won't be the problem, it will be the Senate because it requires 2/3

[regnaD kciN]

16. A House investigation doesn't require the Senate to do diddly-squat...

Basically, tell the Repugs "You can be participants in an investigation, or you can be subjects of an investigation. Choose wisely."

[sheshe2]

15. I am shocked!

Not.

[2naSalit]

17. Heh, imagine that.

[peggysue2]

19. Then the Democratic Party goes it alone

There will be no peace, no party, no country if we dither. Full exposure of the facts and Republican complicity to upturn a lawful, legitimate election.

We take the truth and beat them over the head with it.

[malaise]

22. THIS

Expose them

[RegularJam]

23. No other way they could vote.

I’d be shocked if they voted yes.