Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bev54

(10,048 posts)
Fri May 21, 2021, 10:09 PM May 2021

Comments on DeJoys plan for USPS open now for public

Rachel was discussing that DeJoy is still trying to ruin USPS and has a 10 year plan he would like to institute, which would include no more air mail for first class mail, truck only, and closing many post offices. There is a comment period for one month and the unions are trying to get people to comment on this and to tell them what you as a customer want from your USPS. Rachel did not, however, say how to make those comments so I went to look and they have this site, and unless someone knows anything different, perhaps send your comments through there. While he will hopefully soon be gone, he is, for now, still there and planning to destroy the USPS as you know it. Do not take chances. Write in and get others around you to do the same. The Unions want as many people as possible to write in.

This is the website, I found you can send messages to USPS.

https://www.uspsoig.gov/general/comment-policy

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Comments on DeJoys plan for USPS open now for public (Original Post) Bev54 May 2021 OP
the plan is to drive business to UPS and other garbage private delivery outfits nt msongs May 2021 #1
And then let one of them FoxNewsSucks May 2021 #3
Fuck DeJoystick with a cactus Blue Owl May 2021 #2
Place DeJoy before Congress keithbvadu2 May 2021 #4
my theory is: Republican plan to weaken/destroy mail-in voting CharleyDog May 2021 #20
I am not dumb but I cannot find anywhere on the site where you actually make a specific CurtEastPoint May 2021 #5
That is what I was saying they did not say how to contact on the show Bev54 May 2021 #7
Comment #9 below Bev54 May 2021 #14
What is the title of his plan drmeow May 2021 #6
Check the Iowa Union, they are headlining this. Bev54 May 2021 #8
See my post below drmeow May 2021 #10
I found this page which you can comment on but nothing on this subject yet Bev54 May 2021 #11
This might be it drmeow May 2021 #9
That is it and there is a box for response at the bottom Bev54 May 2021 #12
Looks like USPS doesn't use Regulations.gov drmeow May 2021 #13
Send them by mail, haha they may or may not get there. Bev54 May 2021 #15
LOL drmeow May 2021 #16
Here's how to file specific comments on proposed summer_in_TX May 2021 #17
Thanks for the info Bev54 May 2021 #21
Thank you JustAnotherGen May 2021 #24
Yes, official comments carry far more weight. summer_in_TX May 2021 #26
My comment drmeow May 2021 #29
Well done! summer_in_TX May 2021 #30
the context for forming to USPS drmeow May 2021 #31
Makes total sense to me! summer_in_TX May 2021 #32
We have to get this done people because privatization of our mail oasis May 2021 #18
hotline@uspsoig.gov George McGovern May 2021 #19
Look above at 13 and 17 Bev54 May 2021 #22
K&R! SheltieLover May 2021 #23
Vitally important - thanks. (nt) Pinback May 2021 #25
public complaint site link sense uncommon May 2021 #27
Helpful post. TomSlick May 2021 #28

FoxNewsSucks

(10,429 posts)
3. And then let one of them
Fri May 21, 2021, 10:21 PM
May 2021

buy the USPS and get their hands on that nice multi-billion dollar fund for the next 75 years retirees.

Blue Owl

(50,351 posts)
2. Fuck DeJoystick with a cactus
Fri May 21, 2021, 10:13 PM
May 2021

That piece of shit is only surpassed in repulsiveness by t***p himself

keithbvadu2

(36,778 posts)
4. Place DeJoy before Congress
Fri May 21, 2021, 10:33 PM
May 2021

Throwing away million$ worth of mail sorting machines and going back to manual labor.

Surely there must be a cost-benefit analysis to make such a business decision. Let's see it.

CharleyDog

(757 posts)
20. my theory is: Republican plan to weaken/destroy mail-in voting
Sat May 22, 2021, 12:03 AM
May 2021

If we had no reliable PO, how will people vote by mail. This gives more control of the ballot box, where and when to place it. Millions will be disenfranchised if not able to vote by mail.

Probably swing states, Democratic districts, will get brutal dissection and closures of their mail boxes/post offices. Just like they get brutal closures of their polling places. Now, even worse than before.

Another faucet of voter suppression. And very effective too, if allowed to happen.

CurtEastPoint

(18,639 posts)
5. I am not dumb but I cannot find anywhere on the site where you actually make a specific
Fri May 21, 2021, 10:34 PM
May 2021

comment about this.

Bev54

(10,048 posts)
7. That is what I was saying they did not say how to contact on the show
Fri May 21, 2021, 11:19 PM
May 2021

but there are some different options on the contact page

drmeow

(5,017 posts)
6. What is the title of his plan
Fri May 21, 2021, 11:09 PM
May 2021

The comments might be here: https://www.regulations.gov/

Edit to add

It may not have been posted yet for the public comment period. There is nothing on the union site about it which I'd expect if they are encouraging comments: https://apwu.org/

drmeow

(5,017 posts)
13. Looks like USPS doesn't use Regulations.gov
Fri May 21, 2021, 11:32 PM
May 2021

"The agency does not participate in commenting via regulations.gov. "

"Mail or deliver written comments to the Manager, Product Classification, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Room 4446, Washington, DC 20260-3436. Email comments, containing the name and address of the commenter, may be sent to: PCFederalRegister@usps.gov, with a subject line of “Service Standards for Market-Dominant Mail Products.” Faxed comments are not accepted. All submitted comments and attachments are part of the public record and subject to disclosure. Do not enclose any material in your comments that you consider to be confidential or inappropriate for public disclosure."

summer_in_TX

(2,735 posts)
17. Here's how to file specific comments on proposed
Fri May 21, 2021, 11:44 PM
May 2021

rule changes for the USPS.

Notices of Proposed Rule-Making are published in the Federal Register. You'll need the title of the rule you want to comment on, and be sure to make some specific points.

Email PCFederalRegister@usps.gov
You must provide your full name and address for this to count. It goes into the federal record. They are allowed to ignore any comments that don't have the person standing behind their remarks.

Here's where you can find a summary (with the title) and details of each proposal re the USPS: https://pe.usps.com/FederalRegisterNotice/Index

One that looks like what we need to comment on is titled:
Addressing Standards (but the deadline has passed).

Here's one with a little time (days) left on the comment period:

Published in the Federal Register March 31, 2021.

Priority Mail Express Delivery Times

AGENCY: Postal Service™.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY:

The Postal Service is amending Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM®) in various sections to revise the Priority Mail Express® delivery times and to eliminate the optional 10:30 a.m. delivery time.

DATES: Effective Date: May 23, 2021.

It's a really good plan to file official comments.

JustAnotherGen

(31,813 posts)
24. Thank you
Sat May 22, 2021, 06:45 AM
May 2021

The Fed Register is how we were able to get tariff relief. Its always the best aggregator to register discontent.

drmeow

(5,017 posts)
29. My comment
Sun May 23, 2021, 10:59 AM
May 2021

RE: Service Standards for Market Dominant Mail Products
The amendment to 39 CFR part 121 proposes to “increase the service standards for certain categories of First-Class Mail.” This is a proposal to degrade service in the interests of “cost-effectiveness.” This will drive more US Postal Service business to USPS’s competitors such as UPS, Federal Express, etc.

Compared to the service I have received from USPS, the service I have received from other carriers has been horrible. Federal Express, in particular, uses deceptive practices to claim “on time delivery” with such regularity as to make their “expected delivery date” completely meaningless. It is so bad that, wherever possible, I avoid purchasing from companies which use any service other than USPS for shipping. As a specific example, I’ve found that products sold on Target’s website by a “Target Plus partner” seem to be more likely to be shipped via Federal Express. As a result, I try to find the product elsewhere or forgo the product altogether if I can rather than endure the shipping delays and deceptive practices of Federal Express. This amendment will make it harder for me to do that as I anticipate fewer companies will rely on USPS.

I used to live overseas and have often traveled (and mailed things from) overseas. Every time I do so, I am impressed all over again by the quality and service provided by the USPS! This amendment will start a downward spiral for USPS. Delaying First-Class mail will result in a likely loss of business which will reduce economies of scale leading to worse cost-effectiveness in the long run leading to potentially further amendments like this one.

The role of the USPS is not to make a profit. The role of the USPS is to ensure that all US residents have the same access to mail service regardless of where they live or who they are. Before the founding of this country, the aristocracy had mail privileges not available to commoners (government officials such as members of Congress still have those privileges such as franking). The USPS democratized mail service. When proposing amendments to the Code of Federal Regulations which govern the mail, it is important to keep this in mind. The USPS is about equal and democratic access. Changing First-Class Mail deliver will erode the strength of the USPS which will further erode full, equal, and democratic access to mail service. I am strongly opposed to this rule change.

summer_in_TX

(2,735 posts)
30. Well done!
Sun May 23, 2021, 03:39 PM
May 2021

I learned new things from your comment, especially the context of forming the USPS. Thanks for sharing!

drmeow

(5,017 posts)
31. the context for forming to USPS
Sun May 23, 2021, 05:31 PM
May 2021

Is speculation on my part. I know the aristocracy got to mail things for free using franking and that Congress has the same privilege. I speculate that the gross inequality of that, in a time when mail was a critical way to communicate even locally, was seen as unfair by the Founding fathers.

oasis

(49,376 posts)
18. We have to get this done people because privatization of our mail
Fri May 21, 2021, 11:48 PM
May 2021

will be a chaotic nightmare that can't be undone.

27. public complaint site link
Sat May 22, 2021, 06:47 PM
May 2021

From 'Save the Post Office' - "You can find step-by-step instructions for filing comments with the Postal Regulatory Commission about the USPS proposal to downgrade service standards on our Dashboard about the plan": https://www.savethepostoffice.com/n2021-1/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Comments on DeJoys plan f...