May he be the first of many tweet:

[applegrove]

Link to tweet

[Ilsa]

1. Showing leadership. Good.

Unusual for republicans.

[sheshe2]

2. Good.

I will give him credit for that just like I did Cheney. They are not 'rumpers.

That said. That is all I give them credit for.

[SoCalDavidS]

3. Well, They Pretty Much Needed Romney

I mean, whatever tiny glimmer of a chance the Democrats have of getting to 60, required Mitt to vote in favor.

I can see peeling off around 5 repubs, but that's still MILES away from the 10 which are necessary. 20% of the repub Senators? I just don't see it.

[OAITW r.2.0]

4. Romney is now the anti-Trump

Is he the Party anti-dote?b Hope so, cuz the future look worse without an intelligent opposition.

[Volaris]

6. I keep reading that bit about needed opposition being important.

Nobody can seem to tell me WHY.
at this point, what is it that they're trying to stand opposed TO, that we think that position might have some merit that we should argue with it?

We stand for facts and REALITY. What part of opposing THAT, is NEEDED?

[OAITW r.2.0]

7. I remember Congress back in to 70's when progressive voices in both parties moved

legislation against conservative voices in both parties.

[pazzyanne]

8. + 1 nt

[Snackshack]

5. There should have never.

Been any mention of a Select Committee the Speaker should have just done it after the 1st GOP balk at a Commission.

[Justice matters.]

9. He knows there won't be 60 so it's just for show...

... in case drumpf ends up in prison for most of his crimes, Romney can take back some leadeRship role.