Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 05:22 PM Jan 2012

We need a new path to survive a new paradigm.

It doesn't embed but this Ted talk video is 20 minutes well spent. In fact, I will be spending another 40 minutes with it at some point because it is so informationally dense.

For those who hate blind links, it is a discussion by Paddy Ashdown about the alignments of global power. It contains many observations, some obvious and many not so obvious, at least to me. It is impossible for me to do it justice in a few paragraphs.

It also provides some framework within which the global frustrations with the elite can be viewed.

I would love to hear your opinions about this talk and possibly some ideas of how we can move into the new era more safely.

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We need a new path to survive a new paradigm. (Original Post) hootinholler Jan 2012 OP
Sounds interesting. Will watch it later. Norrin Radd Jan 2012 #1
Ditto. tosh Jan 2012 #15
Listened to it a bit...bout Twenty mins hang a left Jan 2012 #2
Why? hootinholler Jan 2012 #3
Because the subject matter will be deemed "creative speculation" hang a left Jan 2012 #4
So far so good n/t hootinholler Jan 2012 #9
That,s right! hang a left Jan 2012 #12
Remarkable presentation. Octafish Jan 2012 #5
I was astounded hootinholler Jan 2012 #7
bkmrkng to watch later. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #6
Please check back in after you have. n/t hootinholler Jan 2012 #8
listening to it now. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #10
A kick for the West coast n/t hootinholler Jan 2012 #11
astute observations Betty Karlson Jan 2012 #13
That seems to me what we have now hootinholler Jan 2012 #14
 

hang a left

(10,921 posts)
2. Listened to it a bit...bout Twenty mins
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 05:48 PM
Jan 2012

Will watch later. Expect to find your post in the dungeon, but that is where the best discssion takes place.

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
3. Why?
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 05:50 PM
Jan 2012

This is not conspiracy theory or crazy talk. It is a scholarly talk by an expert in global power structures.

Plus posts don't get moved anymore.

 

hang a left

(10,921 posts)
4. Because the subject matter will be deemed "creative speculation"
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 05:55 PM
Jan 2012

These kind of subjects do not do well in gd. So your post will either be buried or alerted upon. Not that I agree with censorship but it happens.

 

hang a left

(10,921 posts)
12. That,s right!
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 04:37 AM
Jan 2012

I am happy to see that this discussion will be allowed outside the dungeon. please don,t get me wrong, I welcome your video and the topic!. I just am used to these types of subjects being removed.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
5. Remarkable presentation.
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 06:02 PM
Jan 2012

Thank you, hootinholler!

Ashdown makes an excellent case about power and information, the rule of law and democracy. I especially like his observations about human and societal inter-connectedness and his ideas about collective action for change.

Not many fellows can talk off the top of their heads like Paddy Ashdown. Fewer still tell the truth when they do. All of them I know are Liberal Democrats.

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
7. I was astounded
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 06:53 PM
Jan 2012

The question now seems to be can we the people of earth build a better network than the 1%?

It is clear from other sources the idea seems to be to return us to a feudalistic existence.

I'm always pleased to hear from you.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
13. astute observations
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 06:27 AM
Jan 2012

but multi-polar power means that we need to define our common interests in moral ways. The alternative is ruthless, immoral, pursuit of short-term interests.

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
14. That seems to me what we have now
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 10:43 AM
Jan 2012

immoral pursuit of short term interests.

Other than OWS, how can we do that?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We need a new path to sur...