General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSpare a Thought for the Billions of People Who Will Never Exist
Link to tweet
Businessweek
@BW
·
May 31, 2021
Spare a thought for the billions of people who will never exist. As world population growth slows, the never-conceived are the ultimate forgotten ones.
Spare a Thought for the Billions of People Who Will Never Exist
As world population growth slows, the never-conceived are the ultimate forgotten ones.
bloomberg.com
Khashoggis Ghost
@UROCKlive1
Image
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-05-24/spare-a-thought-for-the-billions-of-people-who-will-never-exist
A couple decides to have one child instead of two, or none instead of one. This happens all over the world. Billions of children are never conceived. How real is the loss of a life that never began? Is there a right to exist? Is there an ideal size of the world population?
These related questions become more pressing as population growth slows. Chinas population is on track to peak before 2025. Population growth in the U.S. this year is likely to be the lowest in history except for one year, 1918.
The late University of Oxford philosopher Derek Parfit wrestled with the question of the worlds ideal population in an influential 1984 book, Reasons and Persons. He didnt delve into the carrying capacity of the planet, and he stayed away from the issue of abortion, which occurs after conception and thus raises a different set of concerns.
In an abstract, theoretical way, the British thinker presented what he called the Repugnant Conclusion. Heres how he stated it: For any possible population of at least 10 billion people, all with a very high quality of life, there must be some much larger imaginable population whose existence, if other things are equal, would be better, even though its members have lives that are barely worth living.
*snip*
roamer65
(37,953 posts)The higher the cost of living goes, the less children people produce.
This is a GOOD thing for the overall survival of our species.
Skittles
(171,713 posts)if women always had control there would be far fewer people on the planet
OAITW r.2.0
(32,133 posts)Abortion would be a sacrament and birth control would be over the counter.
11 Bravo
(24,310 posts)Quite possibly televised live on ESPN.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,955 posts)MomInTheCrowd
(339 posts)rownesheck
(2,343 posts)I prevent billions of people being born on a weekly basis.
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Yavin4
(37,182 posts)Lucky assholes.
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)Of the Prequels.
Yavin4
(37,182 posts)Buns_of_Fire
(19,161 posts)Response to Nevilledog (Original post)
ExTex This message was self-deleted by its author.
Salviati
(6,059 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)What is that from?
(Except the Gawd part.
😁 - damn old atheist here)
Perfect
Hekate
(100,133 posts)...that is THE most breathtakingly STUPID thing I have ever heard.
Coventina
(29,731 posts)Voluntarily would be preferable, but whatever it takes....
Silent3
(15,909 posts)Only a slow decline of human population would be good for the planet.
Do I have to explain why, or can you understand why by simply taking a moment to think about it?
Life has been on this planet for at least 3.7 billion years. It has less than a billion left to go unless it can leave this planet. So also take a moment to realize that, for all of the destruction we've caused, humans are also the current best hope for earthly life to outlive the planet itself.
Thunderbeast
(3,819 posts)One way or another.
Silent3
(15,909 posts)My response was to the idea that somehow the rest of life on this planet would fare better if humans suddenly went away, and I was disagreeing with that.
If a person (not "the universe" ) cares about non-human life on this planet, they'd be fooling themselves to think that humans suddenly dying off would help non-human life.
Ka-Dinh Oy
(11,686 posts)It does a pretty good job of explaining what could possibly take place if we just disappeared.
Silent3
(15,909 posts)...but only one episode touched upon, and only lightly, problems with untended human technology, like mentioning a chlorine gas tanker eventually corroding and unleashing a toxic cloud.
There's tons of shit like that that would happen, and much worse, that they didn't cover, like untended nuclear reactors, or undersea drilling sites bursting open. Imagine something like the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe happening over and over again, with no one around to stop the flow of oil.
On the time scale of millions of years, of course the planet can recovery from all of that. But in the closer term of a few centuries to a few millennia, the planet would be much, much better off with a slow reduction in human population than a sudden disappearance.
Disaffected
(6,401 posts)Now that's egocentrism on steroids.
Besides, what is there to think that if humans died off another (perhaps more) intelligent species would not evolve (which hopefully would have more sense than us)?
In any case, nature really doesn't care much either way.
Silent3
(15,909 posts)It's all about the ecological disasters that don't happen because of things that we've created, and continue to maintain.
Imagine all of the undersea oil drilling sites bursting open one after another over decades of human neglect, untended nuclear reactors, untended chemical tanks and silos and boxcars and tanker trucks, etc.
Disaffected
(6,401 posts)However I was referring to the supposed imperative of humans establishing presence in other places bit (presumably Mars or the moon or whatever).
Silent3
(15,909 posts)Which I expressed in terms of earthly life itself, not just human life. By the time "we" can effectively spread beyond this planet, if we manage that, it might not be humans (at least as we know humanity) that achieves this.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)Coventina
(29,731 posts)Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)eradicated by "any means necessary". Suppose you could simply bush a button and every human on Earth would drop dead. Would you do it? If not, then you're contradicting yourself.
Coventina
(29,731 posts)And no, I would not kill everyone on earth all at once.
I actually said I prefer that we die off, and by that I meant somewhat gradually. (But far more quickly than we currently are).
I'd be OK if humans numbered about 500 million or so.
Apologies if I did not make that clear.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)given that your post was upthread just a short distance away.
In any case thank you for clarifying your position.
peggysue2
(12,533 posts)There's some really stupid shit being written these days. While the rest of the world worries about sustainability of the environment, food shortages and drought, Mr. Peter Coy would have us worry about those who do not exist. Abstract mind-noodling without concern for the people who do exist, those who scramble for a livelihood, for shelter, food, education for their kids, the basics.
I'd like to think this is satire but I don't get the vibe.
Love this:
The question of the ideal world population size may never be resolved by philosophers. But you dont have to be a philosopher to think about the lives that never happened.
Really? LOL.
Philosopher or not, why would anyone waste time thinking about lives that never happened? Unless, of course, naval gazing is your thing.
Good grief!
Well, at least he pointed out Muzak should be capitalized.
(sigh)
roamer65
(37,953 posts)The population has to be reduced to around 2 billion.
Ehrlich apparently has arrived at that number as well.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/apr/26/world-population-resources-paul-ehrlich
The longer we deplete the planet, the lower that number goes...
Duppers
(28,469 posts)Thanks.
Meowmee
(9,212 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)That is so idiotic, it's painful.
PlanetBev
(4,412 posts)If youre never born, youll never have to listen to another Goli, Geico, Progressive or Liberty Mutual commercial.
Crunchy Frog
(28,280 posts)Solly Mack
(96,943 posts)Solly, what are you thinking about?
Nothing.
(Or)
Solly, what are you thinking about?
The great void created by sperms that never bumped into an egg.
What void?
Exactly.
(I'm going to do it for the looks I'll get)
betsuni
(29,078 posts)Like being stuck in a room with guys who are philosophy majors (the condescending dumb ones).
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)Raine
(31,178 posts)BlueStater
(7,596 posts)Im thinking about how a couple of hundred serial killers and Republican politicians were never conceived and it puts a smile on my face.
Wingus Dingus
(9,173 posts)Can you be forgotten if you never existed? That's deep, man...
JanMichael
(25,725 posts)Wednesdays
(22,602 posts)The text could be used in one of those Keanu Reeves "what if" memes.

KG
(28,795 posts)hatrack
(64,887 posts)skypilot
(9,128 posts)*
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)Was ill-conceived 🙄
Renew Deal
(85,151 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(106,211 posts)MADE" - reply from the official Velveeta account. Never let a dumb idea go to waste.
JHB
(38,213 posts)They didn't exist either.
Mad_Machine76
(24,957 posts)but in reverse LOL
Tom Kitten
(7,372 posts)This story reminded me of an old Peanuts comic from 1970...
It's odd, googling for it I found a story just published a few hours ago carried by Time and Yahoo about how this particular strip changed Ronald Reagan's views on abortion.

It just seems like an odd coincidence...