General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf you refused to get one of the C-19 vaccines and you get the disease you should be ...
... denied all medical attention.
Fuck it I'm done with these MAGA/Evangelical assholes.
Demsrule86
(68,696 posts)supposedly show that the vaccine could cause issues...I honestly don't think so. It is too early for a definitive study...at best they have a correlation. But she is scared.
Phoenix61
(17,019 posts)Heres Where That COVID-19 Vaccine Infertility Myth Came FromAnd Why It Is Not True
Posted on April 23, 2021 by Henry Ford Health System Staff
https://www.henryford.com/blog/2021/04/fertility-rumor-covid-vaccine
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)There are no such studies. It is anti-vax bullshit.
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/covid-19-vaccines-myth-versus-fact
MYTH: The COVID-19 vaccine can affect womens fertility.
FACT: The COVID-19 vaccine will not affect fertility. The truth is that the COVID-19 vaccine encourages the body to create copies of the spike protein found on the coronaviruss surface. This teaches the bodys immune system to fight the virus that has that specific spike protein on it.
Confusion arose when a false report surfaced on social media, saying that the spike protein on this coronavirus was the same as another spike protein called syncitin-1 that is involved in the growth and attachment of the placenta during pregnancy. The false report said that getting the COVID-19 vaccine would cause a womans body to fight this different spike protein and affect her fertility. The two spike proteins are completely different and distinct, and getting the COVID-19 vaccine will not affect the fertility of women who are seeking to become pregnant, including through in vitro fertilization methods. During the Pfizer vaccine tests, 23 women volunteers involved in the study became pregnant, and the only one who suffered a pregnancy loss had not received the actual vaccine, but a placebo.
-----------
You know what will fuck up your friend's ability to reproduce? Getting Covid-19.
Response to Effete Snob (Reply #3)
Post removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #18)
Effete Snob This message was self-deleted by its author.
dawg day
(7,947 posts)because it's not true.
There is no correlation, because there is no evidence.
MU Health Care family medicine doctor Laura Morris, MD, has heard it so many times, she doesnt even wait for her patients to bring it up.
I proactively address this rumor with my patients of reproductive age who have not been vaccinated, said Morris, who treats pregnant women and delivers babies as part of her practice. There is no plausible reason no medical or scientific mechanism for this vaccine to interact with a womans reproductive organs or have any interaction with an egg thats been released or fertilized.
However, Covid itself probably does have an effect on fertility, especially if she DIES or if she spends a year battling the illness.
https://www.muhealth.org/our-stories/does-covid-19-vaccine-affect-fertility-heres-what-experts-say
peggysue2
(10,842 posts)Is that too many rely on internet sites that confirm their own pre-existing bias. Facebook, for instance.
There's plenty of information out there, a lot good but also a lot based on faulty or misread data. You need to dig and read and depend on professional, medical sources, not opinionated bloggers.
One of the big problems right now is that those who fall into conspiracy theory suspect the experts, intellectuals and professional class. That's by design. This entire movement is based on: don't trust your lying eyes and ears. Also, don't trust your critical thinking skills. Believe only . . . conspiracy theory and your own fear and mistrust.
It's a problem that's not going away anytime soon.
This is sadly too true:
However, Covid itself probably does have an effect on fertility, especially if she DIES or if she spends a year battling the illness.
Conspiracy theorists of all stripes have "done research" - i.e. "Googled up shit that confirms what they already think they know".
dawg day
(7,947 posts)"When you need information, who do you trust? How do you judge whether someone should be trusted to give you the right information?"
We really need to teach critical thinking every year starting in 2nd grade maybe.
jimfields33
(15,978 posts)I actually think repugs would go for this if you add a whole slew of behaviors that they dont agree with. This would be a huge slippery slope.
Orrex
(63,225 posts)BSdetect
(8,999 posts)Orrex
(63,225 posts)They could either be required to pay a significantly higher insurance premium or perhaps face reduced coverage for illnesses that could readily have been prevented by vaccination. There is plenty of precedent for this; my insurance won't cover damage to my vehicle if I enter a demolition derby, nor will my life insurance cover me if I die while base-jumping.
Anti-vax holdouts could also be triaged at a lower priority than those who made the responsible choice to vaccinate, assuming otherwise equal severity of illness. That is, if one bed is available, and two patients need it, then doctors might reasonably favor the person who made a responsible effort to avoid the illness.
etc.
Bullfeathers
(108 posts)anxiousness this can bring to someone but where would it end?
Would you deny a smoker medical attention or someone who didt wear a seat belt?
How about a person who didnt wear proper clothing in the winter?
We protect ourselves by getting vaccinated. We get the flu shot so that person who didt get the shot and did catch the flu doesnt pass any deadly disease to us.
I trust being vaccinated.
My state ended the mask mandates and I feel liberated. I still see people wearing masks and I assume they havent been vaccinated
MontanaMama
(23,337 posts)are not vaccinated? Many people wear masks in certain situations even though theyre fully vaxxed. I wear one to the grocery store and other places where Im not sure if everyone around me is vaccinated.
Orrex
(63,225 posts)1. My employer requires masks for direct customer interaction
2. All evidence of the past year shows that a certain group can't be trusted in matters of public health
3. Wearing a mask costs me nothing
4. Wearing a mask certainly doesn't compromise my notion of "liberation"
5. Wearing a mask shows other, more vulnerable people that I am concerned about their well-being
As for the dubious analogies about smokers, seat belts, and light winter clothing:
1. Smoking is forbidden in public buildings and most private establishments, as well as a great many public spaces. Unless you're willing to bar non-vaccinated fools from entering such places, then the analogy fails.
2. The non-use of seat belts poses a threat to others only in rare circumstances; the behavior nor COVID-denying no-mask anti-vax assholes is a direct and active threat to public health, so the analogy fails.
3. One's inadequate clothing in winter also seldom poses a threat to others, so the analogy fails. Unless you're talking about a parent inadequately protecting their child, in which case there are laws in place to address that.
I got that vaccine to protect myself but equally to protect others, because I like to imagine that I live in a functioning society and not a fantasy wasteland of rugged individualists.
Bullfeathers
(108 posts)last paragraph but honestly there are so many different opinions on this topic that I just give up
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)T
MissMillie
(38,582 posts)... "not surprised"
MuseRider
(34,125 posts)but with medical issues I think we should err on the side of kindness, NOT understanding but kindness. At some point when they think about it, if they are still able to think, some might be apt to think a little deeper. Likely not but I think on this, being a medical person and knowing what we all swear to do with our knowledge, that the right thing to do is treat them.
On everything else, fuck 'em.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,619 posts)AmBlue
(3,117 posts)Practically speaking, it might just make more sense to double their heathcare premiums. You know they're gonna need it, and it won't be cheap when they do. It's only fair to let THEM pay for when they or their fellow maggots get COVID.
WyattKansas
(1,648 posts)So I guess they are saying to shoot them just like those who didn't follow quarantine orders in the Wild West. Don't try to analyze what they claim they want, run into their delusions and shatter them with their own claims.