General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI don't understand why the GOP isn't being forced to do an actual talking filibuster
and you stay ON SUBJECT, with no breaks - bathroom or any other kinds.
Why are they still getting away with lazy filibuster votes??
USAFRetired_Liberal
(4,392 posts)Eliminated the need to stay and talk, and also eliminated the requirement for 2/3 of Senators present to 3/5 of ALL senators, yeah 2/3 is more than 3/5 so one would think lowering it to 3/5 would be better to end a filibuster, but the difference is that a senator had to be present in order to count in the 2/3.....for some reason, senators thought that these changes would end the gridlock and help to pass more bills, but it actually encouraged more gridlock and filibusters...I will try and find the reference.
Edit - https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.history.com/.amp/topics/us-government/history-of-the-filibuster
marble falls
(71,661 posts)... was meant to be used: to give cooler heads a chance to work out disagreement and achieve bipartisanship. It was not meant only to derail the other party.
leftieNanner
(16,152 posts)and we have two Dem Senators who will not vote for ANY changes in the filibuster.
USAFRetired_Liberal
(4,392 posts)So when the claim to be holding on to a tradition, they are lying or are clueless
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.history.com/.amp/topics/us-government/history-of-the-filibuster