Homeowner Refusing to Remove 'F*** Biden,' Pro-Trump Flags Faces $500-a-Day Fine

[Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin]

A woman who has decorated the outside of her home with profanity-laced anti-President Joe Biden flags is refusing to remove the paraphernalia despite being issued a notice of violation and drawing the ire of residents.

Andrea Dick argued the six flags, three of which include the words "F*** Biden," hanging on the fence of her home in Roselle Park, New Jersey, are protected under the First Amendment.

However, the borough's code enforcement department disagreed, saying the colorful display breaks a local ordinance that prohibits signs containing "obscene, pornographic or lewd messages," NJ.com reports.

Code enforcement officials sent a "notice of inspection" by mail on Wednesday citing the ordinance and requesting for the signs to be taken down. If Dick does not remove the display from the property, she will be issued with a summons and the matter will be referred to the municipal court, the publication said citing town officials.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/homeowner-refusing-to-remove-f-biden-pro-trump-flags-faces-dollar500-a-day-fine/ar-AAKFJ8r

So is the orange blob worth $500 a day?

[louis-t]

1. I hope it's worth $500 a day to own the libs.

Dumbass.

Maybe she thinks her hero will pay the fine for her.

[PoliticAverse]

13. The taxpayers will bear the cost of her ultimate legal victory. n/t

[In It to Win It]

28. If she chooses to fight this and work it up through the courts, some group out there will take up

the cause for her.

[mahatmakanejeeves]

79. One such group has a name: the American Civil Liberties Union.

There are others just as eager to tell lthe city where it can get off.

[Demsrule86]

68. She is going to lose.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

71. Highly doubtful.

This is protected political speech, especially on her own property and the courts are going to agree with that.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

25. I think the borough is going to pay through the nose for violating

her 1st Amendment right, not the other way around.

[Mr.Bill]

59. Yep, never heard of a borough code

overuling the Constitution.

[ruet]

73. Could Be One of Those...

judgments. She'll still win though. ...and rightly so.

[Dorian Gray]

100. Yes

I think she's a total jerk. But she also has the right to fly her stupid flag.

[inthewind21]

122. Well if that's the case

Then every HOA in the country should have been shut down by now. Don't be so sure she'll automatically win on the "it's my 1st amendment right" argument. It's not that simple.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

123. Ummm, she's not in an HoA,

and she will win on 1A grounds, the town is clearly wrong, they can regulate the size of signs, but they cannot regulate political speech, which this is, especially as it's on her own property.

If the town pursues this, they will lose and lose badly and probably have to pay her court costs, attorney fees and possibly a settlement.

And it is that simple.

[Dorian Gray]

124. This case isn't happening in an HOA

and she didn't have to sign an HOA contract to move into her home. So she'll win.

[jimfields33]

2. Sounds like she just needs to take the Biden signs down

It’s so dumb to put these types of signs out. I would not even put a f*** Trump sign up. The damage done to property could be huge by the MAGA idiots.

[mahatmakanejeeves]

3. She'll win.

If there's a city ordinance that says you can't have a sign in your yard or on your fence no bigger than, say, 20 square feet, that's fine. The ordinance is not targeting content.

If the ordinance is targeting content, that's not fine.

[rsdsharp]

5. Yes, she will. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this.

Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971), held that a man couldn’t be convicted of disturbing the peace for wearing a jacket with the slogan “Fuck the draft.”

It may be tacky, but it’s legal.

[ripcord]

89. I guess I'm just an old fashioned liberal

We marched to protect offensive speech when I was young.

[mahatmakanejeeves]

91. You're right, and yet here we are once again at DU, with people just not understanding what

the First Amendment is all about.

The First Amendment does NOT assure me of the right not to have my feelings hurt.

Andrea Dick is going to win this one, period, the end, one thousand percent, yadda yadda yadda.

It's been said many times, many ways: the First Amendment assures people of the right to let everyone know how big an idiot they are.

If the election of 2016 was any indication, that may be our most cherished right.

Thank you for putting up the good fight.

[rsdsharp]

92. Which is what the Court ruled. In 1971.

“Fuck the Draft” was protected speech, and Cohen couldn’t be guilty of disturbing the peace for wearing it on his jacket.

[iemanja]

111. municipalities all over the country have code restrictions regarding signs

and they haven't been treated in the same way as clothing.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

114. They have code restrictions on the size of signs, but they can't regulate

political content, especially on someone's private property.

If this town takes this all the way to court, they will lose badly and probably end up paying this woman a settlement.

[rsdsharp]

120. Do you have a citation? Those restrictions deal with size and height.

This restriction deals with content. In this case, the flag would appear to pass the SLAPS tests.

[Chainfire]

6. You may be right.

She may have a right to protest, on her own property, that outweighs the State's interest in protecting others from her messages.

I am glad I am not trying to sell the house next door.

[SpankMe]

54. You're all right. She'll win

There's a higher court ruling or 2 that affirm full-on 1st amendment protections for profane bumper stickers.

Lawn or house signage should be no different.

[ornotna]

4. What a dick

Unfortunately she'll probably win.

[Grins]

62. That's her name!!!!!

Her actual name is “Dick”!!!!

Surprised that wasn’t pointed out earlier.

[ornotna]

70. It was in the body of the OP

I'll admit, I went for the easy shot.

Seriously though, she's a dick.

[Effete Snob]

7. The town is full of shit on this one

Being an asshole is one of our most sacred rights as Americans.

[Demsrule86]

66. Nope...there are kids that live there and this has been adjudicated. All the battles have been

won by towns and by homeowner associations.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

69. Really?

You have links for that?
Because I have a mask that says Fuck Trump and it has a picture of an extended middle finger that I wear when I'm out and about and it's perfectly legal, even among children.

I think you're wrong about towns winning the legal fight, HoA's? not so sure.

This is clearly protected political speech and the town is going to lose badly if they decide to pursue it in the courts.

[BlueStater]

107. Do you wear it around children?

Because regardless of whether it’s legal or not, you really shouldn’t.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

108. When I'm doing a delivery, in a store, etc.,

I do.

I've been in a few confrontations over my wearing that mask, but my size and demeanor usually de-escalates the situation.

[BlueStater]

109. Then that's wrong.

I’d get pissed off if you exposed my nephew to that crap. Just because something is legal doesn’t necessarily make it right.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

110. Well, that's your problem,

not mine.

Have a great Fri. and a wonderful weekend.

[BlueStater]

112. Pretty selfish and classless, dude. n/t

[MarineCombatEngineer]

113. Ok. nt

[Effete Snob]

115. "Just because something is legal doesn't necessarily make it right"

That's correct.

Speech which doesn't offend anyone doesn't need legal protection either.

The First Amendment is not there to protect speech that doesn't piss someone off. It is there PRECISELY to protect speech which pisses someone off.

Obviously, if everyone avoided saying things which offended someone, there would be no point to having a First Amendment.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

116. +100. nt

[BlueStater]

118. Yeah, I know what the First Amendment is.

Where in my post did you see me advocate for arresting people who use language that offends me?

You can be profane in front of small children and I’m allowed to express my opinion that it’s a pretty dickish, inconsiderate thing to do. That’s my First Amendment right.

[Effete Snob]

104. Bwahahahahahahahahahhahaah

Funny.

R.A.V. v. St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992)

When the basis for the content discrimination consists entirely of the very reason the entire class of speech at issue is proscribable, no significant danger of idea or viewpoint discrimination exists. Such a reason, having been adjudged neutral enough to support exclusion of the entire class of speech from First Amendment protection, is also neutral enough to form the basis of distinction within the class. To illustrate: a State might choose to prohibit only that obscenity which is the most patently offensive in its prurience — i.e., that which involves the most lascivious displays of sexual activity. But it may not prohibit, for example, only that obscenity which includes offensive political messages. See Kucharek v. Hanaway, 902 F.2d 513, 517 (CA7 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1041 (1991).

[FloridaBlues]

8. Our city council just passed the sign ordinance

[SoonerPride]

9. As much as I hope she has to pay

If she fights this she will win.

The ACLU would even help her. Wouldn’t that be ironic?

[dchill]

10. Wow. I am so hereby owned!

[PoliticAverse]

11. You would think that even a small town in NJ would have access to competant legal advice...

that would advise them to drop the issue as soon as possible before it starts costing them money leading to an eventual loss.

[0rganism]

12. I, for one, am glad she's self-identifying

That should save everyone a bit of time, you'll know what to expect when you interact with Andrea Dick

Trumpists should be encouraged to peacefully proclaim their allegiance as loudly and proudly as they wish, so that others may know them to be mad.

[ZonkerHarris]

14. Build up the fines and then put a lien on her house.

[totodeinhere]

17. Are you kidding me? She should lose her home over some objectional signs?

Tyranny of the left is just as dangerous as tyranny of the right.

[PoliticAverse]

23. It's good to be preiodically reminded that it is not just members of the right that are enemies

of free speech.

[Treefrog]

41. Sadly, there are fairly frequent reminders here.

People bragging about stealing political signs, flipping off other drivers because of their bumper stickers, even stealing someone’s grocery bag out of their cart because it had some slogan the poster didn’t approve of.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

45. +100. nt

[UnderThisLaw]

97. It's also sad

that there are frequent reminders of how horrible we are here at DU, often by the same posters

[ret5hd]

99. One disagreement with your examples:

Flipping off someone for bumper stickers is simply replying with “speech” in disagreement with someone else’s “speech”.

[LanternWaste]

77. The important thing is to merely reference them as a vague demographic...

as telling someone without hiding behind implication requires a lot more conviction than the rationalizations it replaces.

[ZonkerHarris]

56. No. The lien is how you get her to pay the fines and remove the signs.

Assholes like this only do things if forced.
This is how you apply pressure to force a move.
When they realize the potential consequences at play they will remove the signs.
Then when the signs are removed if you want to be nice again you waive the fines.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

57. The town is going to lose badly and she will not pay one cent on those fines,

if anything, her lawyer will most likely file for an injunction against the town to halt any fines being levied.

This is a clear case of a 1A violation and the town would be smart to drop it and let her have her 15 minutes of fame.

[totodeinhere]

129. A lien is a first step towards repossessing the house.

They would lose their house eventually if they do not comply and that would be wrong.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

27. Yeah, that's not going to happen,

this clearly violates the 1A, it's the borough that will be paying through the nose if they pursue this to it's inevitable conclusion.

[totodeinhere]

15. As much as I disagree with this women's sentiments about President Biden,

I do support her free speech rights. It's her property. She should have the right to put up any sign she wants as long as she does not threaten or encourage violence.

I wonder, would the posters at DU also object to a "F*** Trump" sign on someone's lawn? I doubt it.

[Jedi Guy]

61. No, they wouldn't object at all. More likely they'd applaud.

For some folks, freedom of speech comes to a screeching halt when they dislike the speech in question.

There was a thread on a similar topic where someone pulled the Helen Lovejoy Maneuver: won't someone please think of the children?? I seem to recall anti-Trump protests that involved signs bearing profanity, in addition to profane chants. Clearly no one was thinking about the children then.

[BGBD]

16. She'll win

But that also means there's nothing she can do about her neighbors hanging up some "FUCK ANDREA DICK" signs too.

[smirkymonkey]

26. +1000

I like the way you think!

[MarineCombatEngineer]

29. +100. nt

[Raine]

126. Agree nt

[lpbk2713]

18. I might be a cranky old curmudgeon too if my last name was Dick.

Is her home where all the Dicks hang out?

[Sympthsical]

19. Wonder if the officials find the inevitable legal loss worth it

Bet the taxpayers won't be thrilled.

She's an asshole. But on your own property, you can be an asshole.

If she were in an HoA, it might be a different story.

[sarisataka]

20. To paraphrase-

I completely disagree with what you say, but fully support your right to say it without being fined.

[oasis]

21. Less dollars for GOP donations. Please proceed Madame.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

30. It will quite likely be more dollars for GOP donations,

as in she will win the legal battle in court on the 1A issue, she does have a right to be an asshole, especially on her own property.

[Progressive Jones]

22. Her surname says it all. I have a feeling that she's

a douche bag across the board. Probanly a shitty
neighbor, in general.
She's certainly a shitty American.

[In It to Win It]

24. Personally speaking, no flags are worth this amount of trouble. I enjoy my peace much more than

I enjoy "owning" anyone.

[Initech]

31. Going broke just to own the libs.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

32. How do you figure that she is going to go broke just to own the libs?

If anything, she's going to get a nice payday from the taxpayers if the borough decides to pursue this to it's inevitable conclusion in the courts on 1A grounds.

[Initech]

35. $500 a day is going to add up pretty quickly.

And yeah it will suck when they ultimately sue and settle... but that's par for the course these days. It's like the Trump base gets jollies from being obnoxious assholes.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

37. She's not going to pay a cent while this winds it's way through the courts,

she'll most likely get an injunction against the borough that will halt any fines being levied

The 1A guarantees that you can be an obnoxious asshole without Govt. retaliation against you.

[Yavin4]

33. Just give her fines to random African Americans.

Bet she will pull those flags down then.

[smirkymonkey]

34. She looks exactly like what you would expect her to look like.

blob:https://www.nbcnewyork.com/1a1d61b6-7f6f-4d33-8a0e-c7f353fc6c22

And a vulgar moron to boot, just like her bloated overlord.

I'm sure she feels like a fish out of water with no Trump rallies to go to, so she's bringing the spirit of the rally to her hood. Disgusting person.

[TheRickles]

46. If that link doesn't work, try this one:

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/politics/neighbors-want-profane-anti-biden-signs-removed-from-nj-womans-fence-walls/3087699

[smirkymonkey]

49. Thanks!

[mahatmakanejeeves]

81. Oh, great. Now we're attacking her for her looks.

What is it about her looks that makes her not a 10, as Donald Trump might say?

P.S. I think you're a good poster. I like reading your posts, but if the best we can do is to go after someone's looks, we've lost.

There's a reason I don't use an photo of myself as my avatar. I'm not exactly a looker.

Thanks for writing, but please reconsider this line of argument.

[smirkymonkey]

95. Sorry, i know that's low. I usually don't ever do this in real life, but for some reason

Trumpers bring out the worst in me. I just meant that she looked like someone who would be at a Trump Rally. They all kind of look alike, or rather, they have a particular look about them.

I make fun of Trump's looks because he is so horribly judgemental toward everyone else and I guess in my twisted little mind, it takes away some of his power. Even though i know that it solves nothing.

You were right to call me out and I will try to do better. It is petty, but sometimes I can't help myself when it comes to the worst of them.

[mahatmakanejeeves]

96. Thanks. Really. NT

[Progressive Jones]

106. Went to link. "Ooops. that page not found." She sounds like a vile *&@t. nt

[Goodheart]

36. She'd win in court, of course, but there's more to this

I think it's high time that people, even children, become inured to words like "fuck" and "goddammit" and "cunt" that don't break their bones.

[Ka-Dinh Oy]

39. I do not support displaying things with profanity.

Even if it said it about trump. There are children out there and it just makes the community look bad.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

42. You may not support it, and that is your right under our 1A,

as it is her right to display those flags under our 1A.

I may not like what she has to say, but I will defend her right to say it.

[bucolic_frolic]

47. So how about graphic images? They are considered free speech but are regulated.

Not in public, not in a store, not in a library.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

50. I have a mask that says Fuck Trump with an extended middle finger,

and that is protected speech.

You can rent a billboard and put graphic images on it to your heart's content as long as it's not of a criminal nature, IE: child pornography, etc.


There are very narrow exceptions to the 1A, but for the most part, it's wide open.

[mahatmakanejeeves]

82. Google "anti-abortion protestors graphic signs"

https://www.google.com/search?q=anti-abortion+protestors+graphic+signs

[Ka-Dinh Oy]

48. I kind of worded it wrong. I should have said I really do not like.

Yes, she has a right to display her beliefs but it should be done in a responsible manner.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

52. Absolutely,

but the town attempting to levy a $500.00 a day fine is clearly a violation of her 1A right.

It's assholish, vile, and uncalled for, but it is her right.

[Ka-Dinh Oy]

58. It makes me sick when I see trump flags flying but I have no problem with them having free speech.

It is the way she is putting out her free speech. Well, she is just making herself look ignorant. I think people with "fuck trump" look ignorant. Free speach can be said without profanity.

[LanternWaste]

78. And you may lecture people on the obvious... and that is your right under our 1a

Hey... whatever it takes to feel more clever, right?

And we may not like it if someone refers to it as sanctimony or self-righteousness... though we will defend the rights of anyone who says so to say it.









(because the banal is sometimes just that, regardless of the star-spangled awesome t-shirt slogans)

[MarineCombatEngineer]

93. And again,

when you have something to say that's relevant, then maybe I'll listen, but, until then,

Have a great day.

[Goodheart]

72. These words would quickly lose all their offensive impact if we just allowed them

without objection or comment. Basically, they're just sounds that don't break anybody's bones or pick anybody's pockets.

I support her right to use them.

[Ka-Dinh Oy]

75. I worded it wrong. I should have said I dislike.

Yes, I support people's right for free speach despite that I think it looks or sounds bad.

[Jerry2144]

40. If she is in an HoA

They can foreclose. However, it sounds like this is a government agency levying the fine, not a homeowner’s association. So first amendment applies and protects any such speech even if very Repugnant.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

44. Exactly!!!!!! nt

[PoliticAverse]

53. Depends on the state. NJ for example has limited the ability of HOA's to restrict political signage.

[bucolic_frolic]

43. There are signs like that around

Classless, and clueless. It's not the free speech I find offensive, it's the four letter words and the hatred. I don't mean 'so and so is a traitor' or 'jail for them now', I mean calling Democrats scum, evil, the Devil, and worse. I also object to phone poles and public posts being used to carry the messages.

[mahatmakanejeeves]

83. Utility poles are owned by someone, and it's not the person putting the signs on the poles.

Street spam, as it is called, is not protected against removal by the owner of the utility pole or his designated subsitute.

[Historic NY]

51. Herein lays the problem, she is a Dick.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

55. DUzy of the day.

[Whiskeytide]

74. She's just pissed her husband is nicknamed "Tiny". n/t

[Grokenstein]

60. Put up a rainbow flag across the street

and watch her legal opinion do a 180-degree spin.

[Traildogbob]

65. I agree

Just put up many signs, lots of profanity about Trump fucking Ivanka. Dick likes her pissy grabbed. Or “Trump loves Dick”. So many good things to print. Just “Poke the Dick”. Fire with fire.

[mahatmakanejeeves]

85. It's been done.

Google https://www.google.com/search?q=rainbow+house+fred+phelps

Andrea Dick's neighbors are free to do this, though I'm guessing they probably would not. And if Andrea Dick didn't like it, she could go

Westboro Baptist loves the "sodomite rainbow house"

Love thy neighbor: The notorious hate group "thanks God" for the Westboro Equality House

By KATIE MCDONOUGH
PUBLISHED MARCH 20, 2013 9:34PM (EDT)



According to Fred Phelps daughter and outspoken Westboro Baptist member Shirley Phelps-Roper, the notorious hate group is a big fan of its new rainbow-hued neighbors at the Westboro Equality House.

But what homeowner Aaron Jackson calls a "message of love," Phelps-Roper has (not surprisingly) called a "message of nonsense."

All the same, she told Fox News, she thinks it's great publicity. “I love it," she said. "What [Jackson] does is he keeps the eyes of the whole earth on this message. Now every day all people are thinking about is God will not have same-sex marriage.”

Sure. When people look at a rainbow colored pro-equality house across the street from an infamous hate group that pickets the funerals of murdered children, they're almost definitely going to think: "Man, gay marriage is the real problem here."

{snip}

[Azathoth]

63. Restrictions on political speech are subject to the strictest of strict scrutiny

The town has a big, big hill to climb.

[cayugafalls]

64. It's only a couple words. Get over it. This is not the fight.

Just saying, let them show themselves to be what they are...

As others have pointed out, this will not end well for the city.

Protected speech is protected.

[Jimvanhise]

67. Anti-Biden? Really?

So I take it that she refused to accept the $1400 stimulus and the free Covid vaccine?

[Silent3]

76. It's an interesting free speech issue

I think "mere" vulgarity of language is probably completely protected in this case.

On the other hand, you probably couldn't get away with publicly flying flags with nude or pornographic images on them, even if that stuff is fully protected free expression in other contexts.

[Catherine Vincent]

80. She's just looking to get attention from Trumpy

[Tree Lady]

84. About 1/2 mile from my house

On dog walk, guy had lots of Trump signs and flag, now he has that fu Biden flag. Neighbor across street had Biden stuff out and sign about science love all etc until recently. I finally got to meet her she was outside, said she just ignored her neighbors.

In my conservative city there is no way his flag would be illegal. I am just glad no one in my court puts up stuff like that. I am still bugged by neighbor that leaves his trash cans on streets for months at a time.

[Withywindle]

86. So much for the lie about Tr*mp's "working class" supporters

I don't know any working class people who can throw away $500 a day on bullshit like this, do you?

[mahatmakanejeeves]

87. I predict she will pay exactly $0 in fines to the city. NT

[MarineCombatEngineer]

94. She's not going to pay one penny in fines,

more than likely, the town is going to be issuing a nice settlement check to her if they decide to take it all the way to court.

[mahatmakanejeeves]

88. It's yet one more thread at DU that makes me proud to say I went to George Mason Elementary School.

George Mason? Never heard of him. Who's that?

Fri Dec 11, 2020: On this date, December 11, 1725, George Mason was born. He conceived the Bill of Rights.

[RegularJam]

90. Three big Trump flags isn't enough?

This is fomented hate by a cult leader.

[UnderThisLaw]

98. Seems like there's an effective response

A flag with a vulgar pun that includes her first name, her last name, and a transitive verb linking the two

[mahatmakanejeeves]

101. That would be libelous.

Libel

Definition

Libel is a method of defamation expressed by print, writing, pictures, signs, effigies, or any communication embodied in physical form that is injurious to a person's reputation, exposes a person to public hatred, contempt or ridicule, or injures a person in his/her business or profession.

{snip}

[UnderThisLaw]

102. And yet

“Fuck Biden”, “Biden Sucks” and “Biden Blows” aren’t libelous. How interesting.

[mahatmakanejeeves]

103. Biden is a public figure. Much different standard. NT

[UnderThisLaw]

105. She has consented to at least two

news media interviews on her signs. She might well be considered a limited public figure on the subject of her political beliefs

[Elessar Zappa]

117. Actually, no.

You can insult a person publicly all you want as long as you’re not telling a proven lie. Saying “Fuck John” or “Jane is a dumbass” would be protected speech.

[Jersey Devil]

119. Actually, this is an improvement over some of the other Trumpian conduct

like the guy who poops on his Democratic neighbor's lawn - https://www.democraticunderground.com/100215494498

I wonder how this ranks in the Trumpian social status scale

[Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin]

121. Seems to be a shared trait among Trumpers

Those who invaded Congress weren't housetrained either.

[Stinky The Clown]

125. That's what Dicks do

[Raine]

127. Years ago my neighbor put up an ugly hateful sign about John Kerry

when Kerry was running for Predident. Neighbor was allowed to keep it up but had to change the name of his business because of bad publicity, change his phone number, put up with slowed traffic (so did everyone on the block) and passersby yelling at him. Neighbor is also to this day remembered for miles around as being an asshole. I don't think it was worth it to him because he never has put up another political sign.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

130. Update:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/homeowner-with-trump-flags-featuring-profanity-and-middle-fingers-given-court-date-but-she-wont-back-down/ar-AAKQ5A0?li=BBnb7Kz

Homeowner with Trump flags featuring profanity and middle fingers given court date, but she won't back down

A New Jersey homeowner displaying profanity-laced anti-President Joe Biden and pro-former President Donald Trump flags has been ticketed and given a court date by local authorities.

“I’m not taking them down,” said the Roselle Park homeowner’s daughter, Andrea Dick, who argued that she has a First Amendment right to display the flags.

At issue are three of the six flags displayed outside the house, with one that reads, “F*** Biden,” and another that depicts Trump raising his middle fingers.

Now, Dick’s mother has received a summons charging her with “having signs hanging on a fence containing obscenity” and cites an ordinance that prohibits displaying “obscene, pornographic, or lewd messages.” The maximum fine for a violation is $500 per violation daily until the display is removed.

IMO, she's going to win this hands down on 1A grounds.

[BlueStater]

131. Let her keep them up.

Let everyone know what a stupid, crazy, unpleasant person she is. Fuck her.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

132. +100.

Yep, I'd rather have racists, bigots, etc. out in the open where I can see them than hidden.