Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:20 PM Oct 2012

Candy Crowley to defy debate contract

In an interview with CNN this afternoon, Candy Crowley reiterated that, like past town-hall debate moderators, she intends to do more than just hold the microphone at tonight's debate in Hempstead, N.Y. -- an intention that has caused concern for both campaigns.

"They will call on 'Alice,' and 'Alice' will stand up and ask a question. Both candidates will answer. Then there's time for a follow-up question, facilitating a discussion, whatever you want to call it," Crowley said. "So if Alice asks oranges, and someone answers apples, there's the time to go, 'But Alice asked oranges? What's the answer to that?" Or, 'Well, you say this, but what about that?'"

Crowley's vision of her role at tonight's debate is in keeping with past town hall debates, but it would defy the expectations agreed to by both campaigns in the co-signed memorandum of understanding, obtained and released yesterday by Time's Mark Halperin. From section 7, part (c), sub-part (iv) (italics mine):

7. Additional Rules Apllicable to the October 16 Debate...

(c) With respect to all questions...

(iv) The moderator will not ask follow-up questions or comment on either the questions asked by the audience or the answers of the candidates during the debate or otherwise intervene in the debate except to acknowledge the questioners from the audience or enforce the time limits, and invite candidate comments during the 2 minute response period.

There is hardly any gray area here. Crowley is expected to do nothing except to acknowledge questioners, enforce the time limits, and invite candidate comments. Many people -- especially journalists -- would and have objected to that, but that's the agreement

*snip*

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/10/crowley-promises-to-defy-debate-contract-138596.html?hp=t2_3

more at link

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Candy Crowley to defy debate contract (Original Post) one_voice Oct 2012 OP
It's all about her, in her mind flamingdem Oct 2012 #1
it's about her because she wants to (try) to ensure candidates answer the actual question instead of themaguffin Oct 2012 #19
Fine. Which liberal journalist are near Hofstra in Manhattan? Panasonic Oct 2012 #2
The audience member should have the option of asking alsame Oct 2012 #3
She's a legend in her own mind. HappyMe Oct 2012 #4
Personally, I have never enjoyed her "professionalism." jonthebru Oct 2012 #5
The audience should shout at Crowley to sit down and shut the fuck up and moderate Panasonic Oct 2012 #6
She's charged with delivering the deathblow. n/t BumRushDaShow Oct 2012 #7
Go Ask Alice Politicalboi Oct 2012 #8
I'm with Candy on this Enrique Oct 2012 #9
Me too. You go, Candy! nt kstewart33 Oct 2012 #10
I agree- "no follow-ups" is total bullshit. Marr Oct 2012 #12
I agree. I'm so tired of Romney answering questions with answers that have nothing Whovian Oct 2012 #14
I don't understand why the campaigns get to determine the rules for the debate. ejpoeta Oct 2012 #11
The debate commision is made up of Republican and Democratic political operatives. former9thward Oct 2012 #15
From what I heard today Candy did not sign the contract awake Oct 2012 #13
If she didn't sign a contract, the Commission could replace her. gkhouston Oct 2012 #18
In the words of the great William Pitt, "Candy Crowley sucks so hard she bends light". KamaAina Oct 2012 #16
Who gives a shit? Why all this complaining? Obama knows what he's doing. randome Oct 2012 #17

themaguffin

(5,221 posts)
19. it's about her because she wants to (try) to ensure candidates answer the actual question instead of
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:16 PM
Oct 2012

what candidates want to respond with?

 

Panasonic

(2,921 posts)
2. Fine. Which liberal journalist are near Hofstra in Manhattan?
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:23 PM
Oct 2012

Candy Crowley can be removed and replaced with an alternate, someone that finds favor for Obama, not Rmoney.

alsame

(7,784 posts)
3. The audience member should have the option of asking
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:25 PM
Oct 2012

a follow up if they feel it's necessary or pass if they feel their question was adequately answered.

 

Panasonic

(2,921 posts)
6. The audience should shout at Crowley to sit down and shut the fuck up and moderate
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:27 PM
Oct 2012

instead of injecting her personal opinions into the debate.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
9. I'm with Candy on this
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:33 PM
Oct 2012

and Alice.

By the way, can Candy top "Eye of the Sparrow"? We will see...

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
12. I agree- "no follow-ups" is total bullshit.
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:42 PM
Oct 2012

It's a tacit admission that the candidate intends to lie his ass off.

I'm not convinced that Crowley will apply equal standards to both candidates, but in principle this is a good thing.

 

Whovian

(2,866 posts)
14. I agree. I'm so tired of Romney answering questions with answers that have nothing
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:47 PM
Oct 2012

to do with the question asked and the person silently saying "WTF?" and going on to the next question.

ejpoeta

(8,933 posts)
11. I don't understand why the campaigns get to determine the rules for the debate.
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:36 PM
Oct 2012

They shouldn't be able to decide what questions get asked and who gets to reply or what. Otherwise what's the point.

former9thward

(33,424 posts)
15. The debate commision is made up of Republican and Democratic political operatives.
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:49 PM
Oct 2012

So their "rules" are going to be whatever the campaigns want. That is also why the commission always excludes third parties unless a candidate has major support (Perot in 92 and 96). Neither campaign wants a real debate, they want side by side press conferences. So this is what we get.

awake

(3,226 posts)
13. From what I heard today Candy did not sign the contract
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:43 PM
Oct 2012

I hope she is fair and helps hold Mitts feet to the fire, that could get under his skin (It is a very thin skin) then we sit back and watch Mitt blow up.

gkhouston

(21,642 posts)
18. If she didn't sign a contract, the Commission could replace her.
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:14 PM
Oct 2012

Don't hold your breath while waiting for Crowley to be "fair".

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
16. In the words of the great William Pitt, "Candy Crowley sucks so hard she bends light".
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:51 PM
Oct 2012

With this much latitude, we may well find ourselves swallowed up by a black hole!

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
17. Who gives a shit? Why all this complaining? Obama knows what he's doing.
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:54 PM
Oct 2012

Candy Crowley is practically insignificant unless she jumps on a table and starts making chicken noises. We need to stop repeating, over and over, "They're being MEAN to us!"

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Candy Crowley to defy deb...