General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCandy Crowley to defy debate contract
In an interview with CNN this afternoon, Candy Crowley reiterated that, like past town-hall debate moderators, she intends to do more than just hold the microphone at tonight's debate in Hempstead, N.Y. -- an intention that has caused concern for both campaigns.
"They will call on 'Alice,' and 'Alice' will stand up and ask a question. Both candidates will answer. Then there's time for a follow-up question, facilitating a discussion, whatever you want to call it," Crowley said. "So if Alice asks oranges, and someone answers apples, there's the time to go, 'But Alice asked oranges? What's the answer to that?" Or, 'Well, you say this, but what about that?'"
Crowley's vision of her role at tonight's debate is in keeping with past town hall debates, but it would defy the expectations agreed to by both campaigns in the co-signed memorandum of understanding, obtained and released yesterday by Time's Mark Halperin. From section 7, part (c), sub-part (iv) (italics mine):
7. Additional Rules Apllicable to the October 16 Debate...
(c) With respect to all questions...
(iv) The moderator will not ask follow-up questions or comment on either the questions asked by the audience or the answers of the candidates during the debate or otherwise intervene in the debate except to acknowledge the questioners from the audience or enforce the time limits, and invite candidate comments during the 2 minute response period.
There is hardly any gray area here. Crowley is expected to do nothing except to acknowledge questioners, enforce the time limits, and invite candidate comments. Many people -- especially journalists -- would and have objected to that, but that's the agreement
*snip*
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/10/crowley-promises-to-defy-debate-contract-138596.html?hp=t2_3
more at link
flamingdem
(40,891 posts)and her beliefs, which are right wing.
themaguffin
(5,221 posts)what candidates want to respond with?
Panasonic
(2,921 posts)Candy Crowley can be removed and replaced with an alternate, someone that finds favor for Obama, not Rmoney.
alsame
(7,784 posts)a follow up if they feel it's necessary or pass if they feel their question was adequately answered.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Me! Me! Me!
jonthebru
(1,034 posts)Panasonic
(2,921 posts)instead of injecting her personal opinions into the debate.
BumRushDaShow
(169,753 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)I think she'll know. LOL!
Perhaps Magic Mushrooms will be available.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)and Alice.
By the way, can Candy top "Eye of the Sparrow"? We will see...
kstewart33
(6,552 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)It's a tacit admission that the candidate intends to lie his ass off.
I'm not convinced that Crowley will apply equal standards to both candidates, but in principle this is a good thing.
Whovian
(2,866 posts)to do with the question asked and the person silently saying "WTF?" and going on to the next question.
ejpoeta
(8,933 posts)They shouldn't be able to decide what questions get asked and who gets to reply or what. Otherwise what's the point.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)So their "rules" are going to be whatever the campaigns want. That is also why the commission always excludes third parties unless a candidate has major support (Perot in 92 and 96). Neither campaign wants a real debate, they want side by side press conferences. So this is what we get.
awake
(3,226 posts)I hope she is fair and helps hold Mitts feet to the fire, that could get under his skin (It is a very thin skin) then we sit back and watch Mitt blow up.
gkhouston
(21,642 posts)Don't hold your breath while waiting for Crowley to be "fair".
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)With this much latitude, we may well find ourselves swallowed up by a black hole!
randome
(34,845 posts)Candy Crowley is practically insignificant unless she jumps on a table and starts making chicken noises. We need to stop repeating, over and over, "They're being MEAN to us!"