Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jeff Tiedrich response to Manchin saying he will not vote for an overhaul of U.S. election law (Original Post) yaesu Jun 2021 OP
Manchin actually supports the John Lewis Voting Rights Act... PoliticAverse Jun 2021 #1
He supports it ... provided it' amended to include a provision that would make it unconstitutional StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #2
+1. Like a true friend of voting rights dalton99a Jun 2021 #6
This👇 Nevilledog Jun 2021 #11
If he REALLY supports it he will vote to end the filabuster. Tommymac Jun 2021 #3
He's so full of it. He says he supports it because it needs 60 votes... brush Jun 2021 #10
And he is.....? brooklynite Jun 2021 #4
I've been asking the same question for the last year. Bleacher Creature Jun 2021 #7
There is no person, no argument, no "thing" NoMoreRepugs Jun 2021 #8
good ol Dino Joe. NewHendoLib Jun 2021 #5
see my post on this matter in another thread. AllaN01Bear Jun 2021 #9
Manchin, by not voting to overhaul US election law, is actually voting to overhaul US election law. Bluepinky Jun 2021 #12

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
1. Manchin actually supports the John Lewis Voting Rights Act...
Sun Jun 6, 2021, 03:29 PM
Jun 2021
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/manchin-support-measured-voting-reform-lieu-sweeping-democratic/story?id=77646348

And since none of the election law bills are being taken up using reconciliation they will need 60 votes to avoid the filibuster and so need at least 10 actual Republican votes anyway.
 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
2. He supports it ... provided it' amended to include a provision that would make it unconstitutional
Sun Jun 6, 2021, 03:34 PM
Jun 2021

So, no, I'm not impressed.

Nevilledog

(51,080 posts)
11. This👇
Sun Jun 6, 2021, 06:27 PM
Jun 2021


Tweet text:
Ida Bae Wells
@nhannahjones
So, let me get this straight: The same people who are supporting a wave of voter suppression laws only made possible by the gutting of the Voting Rights Act are now expected to support the reinstatement of that very act? This is gaslighting on the grandest scale.
11:31 AM · Jun 6, 2021

Tommymac

(7,263 posts)
3. If he REALLY supports it he will vote to end the filabuster.
Sun Jun 6, 2021, 04:37 PM
Jun 2021

Otherwise his words are just that...words.

brush

(53,764 posts)
10. He's so full of it. He says he supports it because it needs 60 votes...
Sun Jun 6, 2021, 06:22 PM
Jun 2021

which he knows won't happen. The Democratic "For the People" bill that can be passed by reconciliation, a simple majority, he's against.

He's nothing but a republican in sheep's clothing.

Bleacher Creature

(11,256 posts)
7. I've been asking the same question for the last year.
Sun Jun 6, 2021, 05:01 PM
Jun 2021

The best I can tell is that he's some random former journalist who tweets a lot. I agree with his tweets more often than not, but I'm positive that they won't move the needle with Manchin.

NoMoreRepugs

(9,412 posts)
8. There is no person, no argument, no "thing"
Sun Jun 6, 2021, 05:16 PM
Jun 2021

that is going to change ManChins mind. Apparently to ManChin ManChin is more important than Democracy.

Bluepinky

(2,268 posts)
12. Manchin, by not voting to overhaul US election law, is actually voting to overhaul US election law.
Sun Jun 6, 2021, 11:25 PM
Jun 2021

He’s choosing the wrong side, not sure what his end game is.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jeff Tiedrich response to...