So, lets see, Manchin demands bipartisanship with a voting rights bill, or he'll vote no,

[duforsure]

Causing millions to lose their voting rights, especially minorities, and gives corrupt republicans the power to overturn election results just because they can , causing more Democrats to lose their elections. His refusal to prevent these injustices that will happen from his actions makes me wonder has he been corrupted to do this to our country? Why is he claiming bipartisanship is more important to him then millions of Americans losing their voting rights, and elections being corrupted by them reversing them because they didn't win? I think he's a fraud, and investigators should follow the money. This isn't russia Joe.

[pwb]

1. Because the pukes have been so agreeable to

nothing.

[blm]

2. When Nancy gave GOP what they asked for on 1/6 bill, but, McConnell

filibustered the bill, anyway, did Manchin hold McConnell accountable? Nope. He never does.

[AZSkiffyGeek]

3. So 1/6 not passing is Manchin's fault now?

I thought it was Sinema’s, although why Patty Murray gets a pass I’m not sure. Personally, I blame Republicans.

[blm]

7. No. My point was about his public admonitions against

partisanship that manage to avoid the most deserving targets. I’m sorry, did you think I meant something else?

[czarjak]

4. "Can't we all just get along"? American Pipe Dream!

[RegularJam]

5. "and investigators should follow the money."

What investigators?

[JudyM]

6. Wondering the same thing today.

Some here say he’s dumb. He’s not that dumb, no way. His rationale doesn’t cut it, it’s just the most convenient (and self-serving) cover story. I have become a cynic about him, and it’s creeping broader, too. Has he done anything in WV to sell the importance of the principle? Town halls to get feedback and put the ideas out there for his constituents to chew on? I haven’t heard about it, if he has. Seems he finds the Rs’ vitriol more compelling than democracy, since he’s been so passive.