General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFederal Judge Claims the COVID Vaccine Kills More People Than Mass Shootings Do
This is what happens when a right wing judge begins to cite rely on Tucker Carlson's right wing talking points to contradict actual evidence introduced at trial or reality for that matter. I thought that there was a prohibition against relying on evidence outside of the record, but perhaps NewsMax, Fox and OANN enjoy a special privilege.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/federal-judge-claims-the-covid-vaccine-kills-more-people-than-mass-shootings-do/ar-AAKNI7e?ocid=msedgdhp
1. COVID vaccines are more dangerous than assault weapons. Benitez spilled a great deal of ink arguing that mass shootings involving assault weapons are infinitesimally rare. (At the same time, he argued Californias assault weapon ban has utterly failed to limit mass shootings, a contradiction he never attempts to square.) The judge reached his conclusion by discounting experts methods of counting mass shootings. In reality, the AR-15-style rifle, the quintessential assault weapon, was used in many of the nations deadliest mass shootings, including in Boulder, Las Vegas, Aurora, Sutherland Springs, Pittsburgh, and Sandy Hook; a nearly identical rifle was also used in the Pulse massacre. Notably, the weapon was also used in the 2015 San Bernardino attack, which killed 14 Californians. Despite this record of slaughter, Benitez wrote that contrary to public misinformation, mass shooting events are rare events. Benitez added, More people have died from the Covid-19 vaccine than mass shootings in California.
As the Washington Posts Aaron Blake reported on Monday, this claim is false. There have been, at most, three deaths that may be linked to the COVID vaccine in the entire country. That is just one-third the number of people shot to death in last months San Jose massacre. Blake notes that Benitez likely derived this myth from Fox News Tucker Carlson, who manipulated data to misleadingly suggest a link between COVID vaccines and death. Carlsons lies have now crossed over into a major Second Amendment decision.
It should not come as a shock that Benitez regurgitated Carlsons misinformation. The judge is widely known as a crank to attorneys who have tried cases in front of him. One told me: Ive appeared in front of 30 federal judges in my career. He was the most contemptuous, dimwitted one Ive ever been in front of. He clearly opposed our case and tried to impeach our experts in front of the jury, but he wasnt good enough to succeed at it. We won our case.
Stuart G
(38,449 posts)dalton99a
(81,621 posts)msfiddlestix
(7,286 posts)just feels like we have an extraordinary amount of reports indicating there are far too many who seem, to my ears and eyes, rather unqualified to put it as politely as possible.
Bettie
(16,129 posts)and save us all.
Right. Cool. Awesome.
TomCADem
(17,390 posts)The judiciary is not going to do squat if Republicans keep nominating unqualified hacks whose only claim to fame is their partisanship and willingness to disregard the evidence and law in favor of Tucker Carlson talking points.
People keep telling me that....and yet, I recall moments like this and remember that they are seeded in everywhere. Sigh.
JHB
(37,163 posts)Thanks, Dubya, for putting such a paragon of rational thought on the federal courts. Maybe send him a puppy painting.
Chainfire
(17,647 posts)It goes to prove that judge and judgement do not necessarily go together.