Fri Jun 11, 2021, 06:48 PM
soothsayer (38,601 posts)
LEFT: Tucker Carlson with trust fund; RIGHT: Tucker Carlson without trust fundLink to tweet ?s=21 $HOKKer Carlson ᵖᵃʳᵒᵈʸ @SuckerCarlson LEFT: Tucker Carlson with trust fund RIGHT: Tucker Carlson without trust fund ![]()
|
25 replies, 3842 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
soothsayer | Jun 2021 | OP |
cilla4progress | Jun 2021 | #1 | |
soothsayer | Jun 2021 | #2 | |
dchill | Jun 2021 | #3 | |
Hugh_Lebowski | Jun 2021 | #4 | |
soothsayer | Jun 2021 | #5 | |
Hugh_Lebowski | Jun 2021 | #6 | |
soothsayer | Jun 2021 | #7 | |
Hugh_Lebowski | Jun 2021 | #8 | |
whathehell | Jun 2021 | #9 | |
Croney | Jun 2021 | #10 | |
JI7 | Jun 2021 | #11 | |
Skittles | Jun 2021 | #12 | |
whathehell | Jun 2021 | #21 | |
Skittles | Jun 2021 | #22 | |
whathehell | Jun 2021 | #24 | |
BeerBarrelPolka | Jun 2021 | #25 | |
Blue Owl | Jun 2021 | #14 | |
FoxNewsSucks | Jun 2021 | #15 | |
Jon King | Jun 2021 | #19 | |
whathehell | Jun 2021 | #23 | |
Blue Owl | Jun 2021 | #13 | |
Paladin | Jun 2021 | #16 | |
smb | Jun 2021 | #17 | |
wyn borkins | Jun 2021 | #18 | |
LakeArenal | Jun 2021 | #20 |
Response to soothsayer (Original post)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 06:51 PM
cilla4progress (20,070 posts)
1. Much prefer the
untrusted tucker.
some humanness there |
Response to cilla4progress (Reply #1)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 06:52 PM
soothsayer (38,601 posts)
2. I agree
Response to soothsayer (Original post)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 06:52 PM
dchill (32,522 posts)
3. Just wow.
Response to soothsayer (Original post)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 06:59 PM
Hugh_Lebowski (27,691 posts)
4. Awesome how much the other dude looks like a derelict Carlson
It is either a different dude, or that's a pretty solid shop job.
Eyebrows are the only thing that really makes me lean toward the latter. |
Response to Hugh_Lebowski (Reply #4)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 07:00 PM
soothsayer (38,601 posts)
5. Oh, I hadn't thought about real as a possibility. I just figured shop.
Interesting
|
Response to soothsayer (Reply #5)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 07:02 PM
Hugh_Lebowski (27,691 posts)
6. As I added belatedly, the eyebrows make me pretty sure it's shopped
The match is too close.
|
Response to Hugh_Lebowski (Reply #6)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 07:04 PM
soothsayer (38,601 posts)
7. Yeah. Good job
Response to soothsayer (Reply #7)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 07:13 PM
Hugh_Lebowski (27,691 posts)
8. Sometimes shops are combinations of people, too ...
Like you take parts from a person one, and then tack on certain defining characteristics from person two, which makes the end result look a lot like person two.
I'm certainly not sure, but I wouldn't be shocked if it was partly someone else, but with Tuckers eyebrow area. Either way it's friggin hilarious and spot on! |
Response to soothsayer (Original post)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 07:14 PM
whathehell (27,152 posts)
9. What is this supposed to MEAN?
With money he''s a male, without it he 's 'downgraded' to female?
Without the misogynist inference, this makes NO sense to me. |
Response to whathehell (Reply #9)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 07:18 PM
Croney (3,693 posts)
10. Long hair does not a female make.
Response to whathehell (Reply #9)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 07:31 PM
Skittles (144,723 posts)
12. why do you think that is a female
?
|
Response to Skittles (Reply #12)
Sat Jun 12, 2021, 03:13 AM
whathehell (27,152 posts)
21. Because it appears to be one?
Response to whathehell (Reply #21)
Sat Jun 12, 2021, 03:18 AM
Skittles (144,723 posts)
22. looks like a long-haired guy to me
![]() |
Response to Skittles (Reply #22)
Sat Jun 12, 2021, 03:24 AM
BeerBarrelPolka (940 posts)
25. Absolutely
It absolutely looks like a guy.
|
Response to whathehell (Reply #9)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 07:34 PM
Blue Owl (40,912 posts)
14. Dude looks like a washed-up dude
Response to whathehell (Reply #9)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 08:45 PM
FoxNewsSucks (8,181 posts)
15. WHy do you assume that a slovenly image
of someone who looks like they can't afford a haircut or shower must be female? Seems like a pretty insulting presumption.
|
Response to whathehell (Reply #9)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 09:39 PM
Jon King (1,875 posts)
19. That might be the biggest reach for outrage in history.....
Seriously? How does one even get to 'female or male' from that joke?? Its as obvious as could be....with trust fund Tucker can afford suits, haircuts, has a paying job.....without the propping up of his trust fund and connections he would be broke, not able to afford haircuts, etc.
|
Response to Jon King (Reply #19)
Sat Jun 12, 2021, 03:20 AM
whathehell (27,152 posts)
23. No, I'd guess yours is bigger..
The picture looked female to me. Period. Have a nice one.
|
Response to soothsayer (Original post)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 07:33 PM
Blue Owl (40,912 posts)
13. Totally
Response to soothsayer (Original post)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 08:58 PM
Paladin (25,606 posts)
16. EWWWWW! as to both of them. (nt)
Response to soothsayer (Original post)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 08:59 PM
smb (3,078 posts)
17. I Was Expecting It To Be "Dressed In Suit & Tie" vs "Dressed In Fast Food Work Uniform" nt
Response to soothsayer (Original post)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 09:09 PM
wyn borkins (1,054 posts)
18. Way Too Much Botox
I have often wondered if anyone else has noticed that there is something very odd, even peculiar, maybe even 'alien' (as in, not human) about Tucker Karlson's facial features (the image on the left). Because each time he stops talking, his face does a full and complete 'parade rest' as if all of his facial muscles relax (stop working) and his entire face 'droops downward'.
|
Response to soothsayer (Original post)
Fri Jun 11, 2021, 10:22 PM
LakeArenal (22,811 posts)
20. Why assume the right guy is anything but some dude
Maybe he’s some eccentric scientist or trust fund heir.
I hoped it’s shopped. That right guy isn’t a human with feelings. |