Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsColorado adopts emergency rule to protect from 'sham' election audits
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/colorado-adopts-emergency-rule-to-protect-from-sham-election-audits/ar-AALdUJs?li=BB141NW3he Colorado secretary of state announced a temporary emergency adoption of new rules that limit who can access voting equipment in the state and protect the state from "sham" election audits.
Secretary Jena Griswold, a Democrat, said on Thursday the rules are necessary to prevent the types of election equipment inspection and ballot recounts that have been seen in various counties across the nation, such as the present full forensic audit of the Arizona Maricopa County election and the audit of Michigan's Antrim County election.
"A third-party vendor with no election experience is currently performing a faulty, unsecure election audit in Arizona and calls for such sham audits have been spreading in other states," a press release from Griswolds office said. "Several Colorado counties have been contacted by third parties offering to conduct audits."
**************************************
Bravo, Colorado!
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Colorado adopts emergency rule to protect from 'sham' election audits (Original Post)
MissMillie
Jun 2021
OP
Help Me RainCaster...Help, Help Me (Kind) RainCaster...Get S1 IIRC Out Of My Head
wyn borkins
Jun 2021
#4
I believe he's referring to the For the People Act, introduced in the Senate. Here:
Rhiannon12866
Jun 2021
#5
Ohio Joe
(21,898 posts)1. K & R - nt
wyn borkins
(1,372 posts)2. Just An Odd Thought
It would be better if these 'sham-election-audits' were outlawed (and made illegal) nationwide.
RainCaster
(13,702 posts)3. That is part of S1 IIRC
wyn borkins
(1,372 posts)4. Help Me RainCaster...Help, Help Me (Kind) RainCaster...Get S1 IIRC Out Of My Head
I have tried to research, but sadly, I simply cannot fathom your "That is part of S1 IIRC"; perhaps you (kind RainCaster) might point me in the right direction...(OR Not)?
Rhiannon12866
(255,506 posts)5. I believe he's referring to the For the People Act, introduced in the Senate. Here:
Scroll down for the full text:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/1
wyn borkins
(1,372 posts)6. S.1 - For the People Act of 2021
Thank you very much for your response! And I believe you are correct, in that 'RainCaster' was indeed referring to:
S.1 - For the People Act of 2021 - 117th Congress (2021-2022)
Rhiannon12866
(255,506 posts)7. You're more than welcome!
I'm sure that's the one!