General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLawsuit seeking to overturn the 2020 election in trouble because of a "saboteur in their own camp"
Gondor II?
Saboteurs?
Never heard of this case before.
Link to tweet
Faux pas
(16,530 posts)and I l-o-v-e your screen name!
FelineOverlord
(3,851 posts)Thanks!
underpants
(197,197 posts)Do adults not consider that they could be being lied to anymore?
Rocknation
(45,008 posts)but they BOTH pulled out when they saw how bogus our evidence really was."
rocktivity
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)Response to Murphyb849 (Reply #7)
Rocknation This message was self-deleted by its author.
(or would nominating a response to my own post be unethical?)

Rocktivity
SCantiGOP
(14,758 posts)But a saboteur in my family destroyed it.
I could have lived my lifelong dream of being interviewed by Hannity.
Karadeniz
(24,763 posts)Buns_of_Fire
(19,222 posts)zuul
(14,704 posts)Yonnie3
(19,570 posts)Not my fault. Take my word for it and let me pass the class.
DBoon
(25,148 posts)you would just have to wait 2 days to produce it
Yonnie3
(19,570 posts)keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)Is the loss a catastrophe or just plain convenient?
I'll go with convenient.
ret5hd
(22,588 posts)Ocelot II
(131,246 posts)FelineOverlord
(3,851 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(106,601 posts)to leave a few words that, without context, might be taken as a problem. But it's clear the person Davis is trying to blame felt attacked by Davis - "attacking my character":
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.1123851/gov.uscourts.txwd.1123851.168.1.pdf
Reading the Exhibit B, it's clear Davis is just using all this as a GoFundMe opportunity to get the most gullible of Republicans to send him money. I mean, "we can't proceed with this suit because someone promised us money for it, and now they've pulled out"??? This is wingnut entitlement - "we should get paid lots for wasting court time!".
BGBD
(3,282 posts)That there isn't a court in the nation with authority to overturn an election, no matter what evidence they had.
The election was certified and the President sworn in. He can only be removed through impeachment. If somebody is telling you otherwise you can be sure they are looking to take your money.
Ocelot II
(131,246 posts)with no support in any cases or statutes, but they have decided that it's going to work anyhow, because they want it to.
zuul
(14,704 posts)lindysalsagal
(22,998 posts)
?itemid=19000966LetMyPeopleVote
(182,092 posts)monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)KPN
(17,512 posts)Edit that: the Right has truly arrived
If there werent 60 million or so citizens fully cranked up about this it would be purely comical. But the reality is its not
and its dangerous.
KPN
(17,512 posts)Edit that: the Right has truly arrived
If there werent 60 million or so citizens fully cranked up about this it would be purely comical. But the reality is its not
and its dangerous.
LetMyPeopleVote
(182,092 posts)live love laugh
(16,484 posts)ProfessorGAC
(77,292 posts)That's the only thing that sabotaged this imbecilic lawsuit.
Also, this "defector" can't destroy evidence that doesn't exist.
Unless we can define evidence as a rambling "connect the dots" drawing on the back of this fool's bar napkin.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.