Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JohnSJ

(92,454 posts)
Thu Jul 1, 2021, 11:11 AM Jul 2021

The question of Georgia's new election law giving the Elections Board the power to replace a

duly elected county elections board with a single person is still an open issue, and that was not answered with the SC decision with Arizona. I think that is perhaps the most critical issue



2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The question of Georgia's new election law giving the Elections Board the power to replace a (Original Post) JohnSJ Jul 2021 OP
Agree, that's the main issue. I would offer the following about Georgia's law. Hoyt Jul 2021 #1
you are right, that is another major issue with all this, how it might discourage voters from even JohnSJ Jul 2021 #2
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
1. Agree, that's the main issue. I would offer the following about Georgia's law.
Thu Jul 1, 2021, 11:20 AM
Jul 2021
There is one part of the legislation that could really cause chit to fly -- the part about removing local election boards -- but even it is limited in GOPers' ability to steal an election. I am worried about that part, but this summary made me feel a bit better --

". . . . . . .In Chatham [essentially Savannah], the five-person elections board, four of whom are elected, acts as the superintendent. If, after a performance review, the majority of the State Elections Board votes that the county elections officials demonstrated "nonfeasance, malfeasance, or gross negligence," then they can appoint a replacement superintendent.

"But this provision has limits. It can only be done in four counties at a time. Plus, it would be impossible to put an appointee into place during or immediately following an election, since the preliminary hearing required beforehand must be at least 30 days after the request to investigate. [The certification deadline for Georgia counties is even shorter now: six days after the election, down from the previous 10-day deadline. It's 17 days after the election for the state certification.]"

https://www.savannahnow.com/story/news/2021/04/07/georgia-new-election-law-republicans-overturn-results-senate-bill-202/7092460002/


Chatham County went 58.6% for Biden.


I know it's not popular, but I think we'll survive Georgia's new legislation even if the Courts don't act. It's not that hard and I hope we don’t discourage voters by making it sound like their votes won't count. I think the Courts will not be as quick to approve the vague lection board laws as they were a state requiring people to vote at the correct precinct.

JohnSJ

(92,454 posts)
2. you are right, that is another major issue with all this, how it might discourage voters from even
Thu Jul 1, 2021, 11:26 AM
Jul 2021

voting

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The question of Georgia's...