Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,244 posts)
Thu Jul 1, 2021, 01:35 PM Jul 2021

Police Officer Admit He's Playing a Taylor Swift Song to Keep Activist's Video Off YouTube





https://gizmodo.com/watch-a-police-officer-admit-hes-playing-a-taylor-swift-1847211462?rev=1625154688932

On Tuesday, a group of protesters showed up at the Alameda Courthouse in Oakland, California, for the pre-trial hearing for Jason Fletcher, a police officer who was charged with manslaughter for shooting and killing Steven Taylor, a Black man, inside of a Walmart last year. Along with Taylor’s family, advocates for justice gathered to listen to the hearing broadcast on the courthouse steps, as covid restrictions prevented them from entering the courtroom. That’s when a sheriff’s deputy showed up with some pop tunes.

In a video taken on the steps, policy director for the Anti-Police Terror Project James Burch can be seen asking a sheriff’s deputy why the group can’t use their banner. Midway through the conversation, the sheriff’s deputy pulled out his phone, turned up Taylor Swift’s “Blank Space” on speaker, and slid it into his shirt. “You can record all you want,” he told the person filming, “I just know it just can’t be posted on YouTube.” Sheriff’s deputy David Shelby then turned to show the camera the name on his uniform.

Shelby’s approach is now a known police tactic: weaponizing YouTube’s copyright flagging system against public citizens. Earlier this year, a Beverly Hills officer chose Sublime as the backtrack for his conversation with a man who came to dispute a ticket. (The video remains on Instagram.) The video would predictably trigger YouTube’s automated content ID system, which would pick up on Swift’s copyrighted song and trigger a block on the entire video. It also raises the chances that a record label would explicitly request the video to be removed.

Burch told Gizmodo that the group began filming when a group of four officers repeatedly interrupted their listening to tell them to move “Justice for Steven Taylor” banners they’d hung on the walls. When they moved the banner to the stairs and again gathered to listen to the hearing, the officers then told them that people “could trip,” despite the fact that no one was walking through the area. Burch said the group felt compelled to film because the over-aggressive approach started to feel “concerning.”

*snip*



Tweet text:
Travis Akers
@travisakers
This police officer begins playing @taylorswift13 on his cell phone while on duty in order to have videos of him removed from social media because of DMCA rules that do not allow the sharing of copyrighted music.

Video: @APTPaction


10:29 AM · Jul 1, 2021
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Aristus

(66,487 posts)
10. If the Capitol police start doing this shit, then they're pigs, too.
Thu Jul 1, 2021, 02:56 PM
Jul 2021

In the meantime, they have my support. Just as any public official who takes his oath to serve the public has my support. Until they abrogate that oath by abusing the public.

GregariousGroundhog

(7,527 posts)
3. Youtube allows uploader too appeal copyright strikes
Thu Jul 1, 2021, 01:46 PM
Jul 2021

I suspect that upon manual review, Youtube would agree with a Fair Use argument that it is in the public's interest to allow the video given that the police officers are trying to use copyrighted music to avoid scrutiny. It makes it seem like the cops are trying to hide something and it only really delays the video's posting by a day or two.

Dr. Strange

(25,927 posts)
13. I don't think YouTube makes Fair Use decisions.
Thu Jul 1, 2021, 03:56 PM
Jul 2021

If I'm remembering correctly, it goes something like this: if someone claims Fair Use, then YouTube sends the response to the rightsholder to let them withdraw their request. If the rightsholder doesn't, then YouTube informs the uploading party and either blocks the video or allows the rightsholder to monetize.

lapfog_1

(29,238 posts)
4. they should send this to Taylor Swift
Thu Jul 1, 2021, 01:47 PM
Jul 2021

and ask her to post it on her FaceBook.

My guess is that she would not like her music being used this way

Eugene

(61,974 posts)
5. Others have noted that such use is a public exhibition, which is also subject to licensing.
Thu Jul 1, 2021, 01:53 PM
Jul 2021

Of course, I'm not holding my breath waiting for the rights holder, a private equity firm, to step up.

dmr

(28,351 posts)
6. Cop should be disciplined for playing with his phone while on duty.
Thu Jul 1, 2021, 02:11 PM
Jul 2021

"Listening" to and/or being entertained by music is not in his job description. So turn it off and put it away.

hunter

(38,339 posts)
7. Cell phones were gleefully embraced by dirty cops in so many different ways.
Thu Jul 1, 2021, 02:31 PM
Jul 2021

In ancient times the police had to use radio bands subject to public scrutiny.

Lots of people are not allowed to use personal cell phones at work.

I don't see why it shouldn't be any different for cops.

TheBlackAdder

(28,239 posts)
12. Taylor doesn't control her original songs anymore, they were sold from under her. She's rerecording.
Thu Jul 1, 2021, 03:04 PM
Jul 2021
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Police Officer Admit He's...