General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy It's So Easy to Hate Ken Paxton
Link to tweet
Theres some chance this time, however, that prayers will be answered. Paxton has already been kicked around publicly by the courts; now he is facing state and federal corruption probes, Texas Bar proceedings for alleged legal-ethics violations, and (perhaps worst of all) he has now begun to reek of political vulnerability.
Paxtons record as a what I will call, for lack of a better term, lawyer is distinctly mixed. In the past year, Paxtons two highest-profile lawsuits turned out badly for him. In November, he asked the Supreme Court to invalidate the entire Affordable Care Act on the grounds that it used to have an individual mandate but doesnt anymore. In January, he went directly to the Supreme Court to ask the Justices to install Donald Trump for a second term.
In both cases, the Roberts Court sent him packing under the same rationalePaxton and Texas, the Justices wrote, lack standing to sue. Standing is what I call the what the hell business is it of yours? principle. In order to get into federal court, a party has to do more than come up with a theory about why someone else has broken the law; the party has to show that the violation of law hurt him or her in particular. So what if the fence is an inch too high? Does it cut off your view, or shade your garden, or do anything at all to you? Unlike in politics, in federal courts hating your neighbor isnt good enough; you must also suffer a concrete and particularized injury.
Particularization hasnt gone so well for Paxton lately. His attempt to overturn the election was based on a claim that the state governments in four states carried by Biden had not followed their state constitutions and laws in conducting their presidential electionsthe equivalent, in other words, of dragging up a lawn chair to root for one side or another in a neighbors marital spat. This novel theory was met with a cold shoulder: Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections, the court wrote in a brief order, using legal terms that mean, Go back inside, hoss.
Hekate
(90,562 posts)smh
crickets
(25,952 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)It's like we are drowning in it and I don't know if we can possibly clean up our own mess. I am so disgusted by the corruption and by how low we have sunk. What bothers me even more is that there doesn't seem to be a thing we can do about it before the next election which means we are screwed.
Even if we get every single registered Democratic voter to get out on election day to vote, i fear that they have hacked things so badly that we can not possibly win, because they will not allow a fair election to happen.
Those of you in the know, tell us, is there anything we can do to mitigate or reverse the damage that they have done to voting rights, including gerrymandering, timing, and racist voter suppression tactics that they have employed in the south, west and midwestern areas of the nation?
tanyev
(42,521 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,603 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(144,939 posts)Link to tweet
Patrick had a 36% total approval rating, and a 37% disapproval rating.
Blank pointed out that many state officials remain unknown in the eyes of Texan voters, but that is becoming less and less the case.
I think it's notable that over half of Democrats now register a negative opinion in fact a strongly negative opinion of him, Blank said of Paxton.