General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan we figure out how to get the ERA enacted? Is it hopeless, an artifact of "then" and not "now"?
My feminist relatives discussed this over the holiday. Comments ranged from "Oh my god, YES!" to "We have to do this differently. The ERA was a creature of its time and now we are post-ERA.
Should we abandon and take the alternative course of building it's ramification one by one?
I am not a constitutional lawyer. If you have information on the progress/non-progress of the ERA's inherent values to the status of women, please tell me what you know and I do not.
Thanks to all who might feel this is a good holiday to re-think the ERA.
flying_wahini
(6,578 posts)I mean, just pay everyone that has the same jobs the same pay.
I really think it would pass if they brought it up for a vote Now.
So many women work, vs when they first tried to pass it in 1982.
It is a two step process and even tho it passed there were several states that refused to ratify it.
The 15 states that did not ratify the Equal Rights Amendment before the 1982 deadline were Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, and Virginia.
CTyankee
(63,889 posts)Do you see any of those states supporting the ERA now?
Polybius
(15,334 posts)Even if Roe vs. Wade was overturned, the ERA would likely re-legalize abortion again. Their side knows this.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)CTyankee
(63,889 posts)Polybius
(15,334 posts)If she said it, I'd imagine a majority of the SC thinks the same way.
rampartc
(5,385 posts)but getting this past 36 state legislatures is , well, daunting.
CrispyQ
(36,421 posts)Our side really dropped the ball at the state level.
https://ballotpedia.org/State_government_trifectas