Kraken attorney claims that they cannot be sanction due to cases too numerous to mention

[LetMyPeopleVote]

When one does not have authority to support one's claim, then it is not wise to pretend that such authority exists

Link to tweet

[Dr. Strange]

1. Who is this STEFANIE LAMBERT JUNTTILA...

and why does her signature have a different spelling than her name?

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.146.0.pdf

[gratuitous]

2. Yeah, judges just HATE case citations

Bald, unsupported assertions are so much more persuasive than some boring old F Supp2d case.

[WHITT]

3. Indeed

it would be an INSULT to all involved. Only the great unwashed delve into citing authorities.

[LetMyPeopleVote]

4. Barb McQuade-Don't do this

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

[LetMyPeopleVote]

5. Parker To "Kraken" Attorney: Insult Me

The judge was not amused by this claim by a kraken attorney https://talkingpointsmemo.com/live-blog/michigan-judge-holds-sanctions-hearing-on-2020-election-conspiracy-mongers?entry=1380895

Stefanie Lambert Junttila, a “Kraken” attorney, argued earlier that there were so many First Amendment defenses for filing the complaint that it “would be insulting to all involved.”

Parker asked for the citation. “I won’t be insulted,” she said.

“These suits are critical to our country to show that every vote counts,” Junttila replied. “Everyone should be allowed to bring lawsuits to ensure election integrity.”

She went on, before asking Parker: “Does this answer the court’s question?”

“No,” the judge replied.