General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUK weighs ban on boiling live lobsters
https://thehill.com/policy/international/561881-uk-weighs-ban-on-boiling-lobsterThe United Kingdom is weighing a ban on boiling live lobsters, crabs and other crustaceans amid a push from animal welfare activists to include the invertebrates in legislation that would recognize them as sentient beings.
Legislation currently being weighed in the House of Lords would not only seriously boost animal welfare protections but also require the government to consider animals' feelings when writing regulations.
Though the legislation currently only includes vertebrates, lawmakers are weighing expanding it to include invertebrates such as lobsters, as well as octopuses and mussels, according to The Times.
The legislation comes as the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said it has commissioned a study to examine the creatures sentience.
(excerpt)
Describing a lobster (let alone a mussel) as sentient and having feelings seems a bit of a stretch.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)to survive and reproduce, thus such behavior is "hardwired" into them.
Mariana
(14,956 posts)CoopersDad
(2,805 posts)How very thick of us.
We are vertebrates, therefore other invertebrates are better than invertbrates, seems to be the logic here.
To the legislators, stop what you're doing and go to your respective libraries and give this a think.
Compare an Octopus to Ted Cruz, and then get back to me.
MoonRiver
(36,959 posts)Submariner
(12,626 posts)Lobsters lack the brain anatomy needed to feel pain, said Ayers, who builds robots modeled on lobster and sea-lamprey neurobiology. Lobsters and other crustaceans are often swallowed whole by predators, he added, so they never needed to evolve the ability to detect pain from, say, warming water or an electric shock.
A new animal protection law in Switzerland requires that lobsters be stunned before being cooked. Animal rights activists and some scientists argue that lobsters' central nervous systems are complex enough that they can feel pain. There is no conclusive evidence about whether lobsters can feel pain.
Croney
(4,860 posts)sanatanadharma
(4,064 posts)Why shouldn't I think that humans are just hard-wired to pull a hand back from the fire.
After all, plenty of materialist, scientist minded people seem to deny that consciousness (the knower of pain) is any more than an epiphenomena of electro-chemical activity in the body-mind-sense-complex that we call "I" or me.
If consciousness is only an add-on to the fundamentally real and thus dispensable, there is no difference between lobster and man except the complexity of their feelings, fantasies and dreams.
All life is sentient, in my opinion-understanding. All life forms are aware of their environment and I doubt that only higher life forms seek to avoid discomfort and pain due to feelings rather than programming.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)sanatanadharma
(4,064 posts)I am a vegetarian, so I do differentiate between rabbits and carrots, I eat the one that doesn't run.
To be consistent, I'd have to avoid the lobster and eat the life of the mussel.
Yet, though mussels can't flee, they do hide.
I won't swat a mosquito but accept my wife's killing of cockroaches.
All life is sentient, but not all life-forms have the means to express (make obvious) that inner awareness.
Science reveals that plants, non-moving, locked to one place do 'pull-back from' negative stimulus.
Radishes are silent, but trees rustle in the wind.
Disaffected
(4,983 posts)we simply don't know where it is. The assumption that lobsters are not sentient to any degree is only that - an assumption. And, when you get right down to it, there is not even a conclusive way of knowing that anyone, either than yourself, is actually sentient. We just do not know enough about the functioning of nervous systems to tell.
When, if ever, we come up with an explanation of exactly how a nervous system causes sentience, we will be in a better position to know.
BTW, in the 19th century IIRC there was a theory going around in certain European laboratories that animals such as dogs used in experiments were not sentient and therefore could not experience pain. So, they were strapped down and operated on without anesthesia along with other horrific experimental procedures.
Ms. Toad
(35,337 posts)circumcisons were done without any kind of pain control on the basis that infants were not well enough developed to feel pain.
Parents don't have to be told that, and many pediatricians don't either. But the contrary belief - that the smallest babies are such primitive organisms that they are oblivious to pain - has persisted for decades among many physicians who have routinely operated on these children with little or no anesthesia.
https://www.nytimes.com/1987/11/24/science/infants-sense-of-pain-is-recognized-finally.html
When I was pregnant in 1987, and deciding about circumcision if I had a male child, the idea that infants don't feel pain was still as common as not.
Disaffected
(4,983 posts)human hubris.
sarisataka
(20,791 posts)The approximate sentience of a rock. Still I do have some issues with cooking live animals.
An octopus OTH is an extremely intelligent creature
wryter2000
(47,260 posts)They are amazing.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... with melted butter. So tasty.
Klaralven
(7,510 posts)Clash City Rocker
(3,526 posts)dhol82
(9,420 posts)Let them die of hypoxia first?
wryter2000
(47,260 posts)Unless they plan to ban eating lobsters, someone is going to have to kill them.
48656c6c6f20
(7,638 posts)Firing squad?