General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEric Boehlert: Tucker Carlson's NSA spying story gets dumber and dumber
Tucker Carlson's NSA spying story gets dumber and dumber
No there there
Eric Boehlert
1 hr ago
snip//
Nothing about this caper makes sense, which is fitting since Carlson is congenital liar. He refuses to provide any evidence that the emails were leaked, or name the so-called journalists who received the communications directly from the NSA. He claims to know which journalists have his emails (one of them called him to discuss it!), but he wont come forward with that information. And neither will the journalists themselves. Carlson suggests reporters across the Beltway were given his emails directly from the NSA, yet as this controversy spreads, every single one of those reporters is remaining silent for no apparent reason.
What are the odds?
Meanwhile, Carlson plays the martyrdom card to the hilt, portraying himself as a crusading journalist: I think more ominously they are using information they gather to put leverage, to threaten opposition journalists, people who criticize the Biden administration. Its happening to me right now, and I think its shocking. I dont think we should put up with it in a free country.
People who criticize the Biden administration are being threatened. Except none of them are. Carlson works for a network that frantically condemns every sentence President Joe Biden utters, which means the administration must be monitoring hundreds of Fox employees, right? But for some reason, the only person on the Fox News payroll being spied on is Tucker?
And if Biden had declared war on conservative journalists, why isnt Fox News championing Carlsons claims? To date, the network has been extraordinarily quiet regarding the dopey saga, choosing largely to ignore it. Fox is right to tread carefully because its biggest star is a huge liar and has historically proven particularly dishonest in describing his own supposed persecution, noted Media Matters.
Heres the Keystone Kops chronology of events. In the spring, the Fox host turned to intermediaries to open lines of communication with the Kremlin regarding an interview request, which is a very strange thing to do. I guarantee you when Wallace and Kelly scored their Putin Q&As they didnt do it by emailing shady figures in Putins orbit. We can assume they did it by following traditional channels of communication via the State Department. Not surprisingly, Carlson likely ended up communicating with foreign agents close to Putin whom the NSA was monitoring. They probably knew they were being monitored, but never told Carlson his communications were being incidentally collected.
As for the dastardly leak? Theres still no proof it happened, other than Carlsons untrustworthy word. He could easily provide evidence but he wont. And specifically, he wont provide proof that the emails were leaked to journalists directly by the NSA. Thats key because its possible Carlsons email pals Putins cronies decided to share the contents of the emails with others inside the Beltway.
more...
https://pressrun.media/p/tucker-carlsons-nsa-spying-story
Claire Oh Nette
(2,636 posts)In fact, didn't they go to court and argue that anyone who listens to Tucker knows it's all nonsense?
They are in no way "news." What happened to truth in advertising??
Baitball Blogger
(46,703 posts)Because, I've heard about Republicans being concerned about NSA wiretapping back in the Trump term. Is this just a carry over? Or is this recent?
OAITW r.2.0
(24,467 posts)"its possible Carlsons email pals Putins cronies decided to share the contents of the emails with others inside the Beltway."
Makes total sense, actually. Why wouldn't the Russians inject more paranoia into the RW swamps? Seems like something that they'd do to stir up even more shit within our society.
Jilly_in_VA
(9,966 posts)when first we practice to deceive. Fcuker Snarlson would do well to remember those words.
Martin68
(22,794 posts)Put up or shut up.
struggle4progress
(118,282 posts)SergeStorms
(19,199 posts)calling me a Formula 1 race car driver because I own a car.
Carlson is an entertainer, even by Fox's own definition, and wouldn't make a pimple on an actual journalist's ass. He's a lying talk show host. He's Jerry Springer without Springer's sense of humor and "interesting" guests.
Why anyone would take anything Carlson says as factual baffles me. Fox, if they were honest and an actual news channel, would announce before his show started that Carlson is an entertainer, and that his show is personal opinion and should not be taken as actual news.
Of course that will never happen, because Fox is nothing but the gigantic propaganda Wurlitzer of right-wing politics in the United States. They relate approximately the same to being an actual news channel, as Tucker Carlson relates to being an actual journalist. In short, not at all.