General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMeet Rachel Palmer Hooper, Federalist-linked "have-more" destroying a man's life for voting
What does this woman NOT have. Such a nice suit. Shes an attorney for Baker Hostetler in Houston, and she has worked on BIG cases, representing energy companies, Madoff clients, a telecom company. Now, as of January 4, 2021, shes a partner at the firm.
But in March 2020 she turned her attention to this man, Hervis Rogers.
Mr. Rogers doesnt have much but in 2020 one thing he did have a lot of was patience to go vote in the democratic primary. He waited for 7 hours and made it on TV about that. In 2020 he was regaining his right to vote, because his parole for a burglary that happened in 1995 was ending, which meant he was going to able to vote again in 2020. Unfortunately the election in which he voted was held in March 2020, and the sharp-eyed has-more Rachel Palmer Hooper noted that Mr. Rogers parole was not expiring until 6-13-20 (although the handwriting on the 6 looks more like a U).
So on a time line we have F for felony, P for parole, V for voted and E for parole end, by month:
Fxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxx.
xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxPooooooo.oooooooooooo.oooooooooooo.oooooooooooo.
.oooooooooooo.oooooooooooo.oooooooooooo.oooooooooooo.oooooooooooo.oooooooooooo.
oooooooooooo.oooooooooooo.oooooooooooo.oooooooooooo.oooooooooooo.ooVooEaaaaaa.aaaaaa
Where x = a month behind bars amd o is a month on parole and a is when he would have been allowed to vote for being past his parole.
Ms. Rachel Palmer Hooper used her company email @bakerlaw.com in the records request so one has to assume that she was working in her employed capacity at Baker law when she had this particular streak of meanness.
Rachel Hooper, a Republican precinct chair in Harris county, filed a formal complaint in March last year, saying Harris was ineligible to vote.
She obtained a copy of his voter registration application through a public records request and noted he had signed a statement indicating he had completed all punishment for a felony. The form only contains the warning in small print at the bottom of the application.
In an email to the Guardian last year, Hooper wrote: As a former prosecutor, I want to give them the opportunity to investigate and take action. As a voter, I just felt a sense of obligation to file this complaint after learning that Mr Rogers was in violation of Texas election law.
Mr. Rogers is sitting in jail, unable to afford bail, for having voted. It wasnt enough for the Republican Party to ensure that he had to wait in 7 hour lines in Texas. Nope. They want to make an example out of him.
Too bad he doesnt have the money that I imagine Rachel Palmer Hooper has. If he was a rich law partner, he would have had a safe way to participate in American democracy. He could have made whatever secret donations (or non-secret donations) that he wanted to make to the candidates of his choice, without having to cast a single ballot. No 7-hour wait required. No pesky questions about being a former felon.
Oh, Ms. Rachel Palmer Hoover. Maybe you know something about this man that isnt public, from your time as a prosecutor. You did prosecute some atrocious crimes. But maybe this time you were just on a partisan anti-democracy witch hunt in order to get a bunch of gold stars. Ugh. Who cares about a man who already spent 10 years in prison for burglary finding himself in jail 25 years after his crime for voting months short of when it would have been legal for him to do so. Certainly not you. Ugh.
https://www.bakerlaw.com/RachelPalmerHooper
MLAA
(17,277 posts)Heartbreaking.
oasis
(49,376 posts)freedom as well as those jobs.
Cruelty is the point.
PortTack
(32,754 posts)lostnfound
(16,171 posts)wcmagumba
(2,883 posts)between this one, guilfoyle and others the hatred for the have little by the have lots (and lots) and in the name of their republican AK packin Jesus want more...
IcyPeas
(21,857 posts)lostnfound
(16,171 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,444 posts)ShazzieB
(16,366 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,126 posts)This lady is a typical Federalist society asshole
DanieRains
(4,619 posts)The law is only for poor folk.
And Weisselberg may not have to go to jail after years of tax fraud.
Skittles
(153,147 posts)nothing new for these fascists
cate94
(2,810 posts)I feel so sorry for this man.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,126 posts)Takket
(21,555 posts)interesting...
I'm going to set aside all the legalities and ethics of this case, and focus on that line: "representing energy companies, Madoff clients, a telecom company".
This woman is a partner at a law firm and involved in some of the biggest cases. How does this even get on her radar? This is rather like lion chasing down a gazelle pausing to eat a mosquito. When she became aware why did she even get involved? An act like this is WAY too small and insignificant. Someone asked her to get involved. Who? Why?
Response to Takket (Reply #15)
ExTex This message was self-deleted by its author.
Ilsa
(61,694 posts)He will lose his job and freedom from an innocent mistake.