Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jilly_in_VA

(9,962 posts)
Wed Jul 21, 2021, 01:15 PM Jul 2021

Why does Jeff Bezos's rocket look like that? An inquiry

Jeff Bezos’s 11-minute trip aboard a Blue Origin rocket to the edge of space on Tuesday left the world’s richest man feeling “unbelievably good” and his crew “very happy”. But afterwards, as he wondered aloud how fast he could refuel, the rest of the world was left pondering just why the New Shepard rocket had such a distinctive shape.

As social media erupted with innuendo, we contacted a few experts to find out why it looked, in the words of one astrophysicist, so “anthropomorphic”. At one major research institution, the press officer referred us to the gender studies department, but Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, was able to shed some light on the topic.

New Shepard consists of a mushroom-like crew capsule that flares out over a long shaft, called a booster. The rounded top appears more bulbous than that of many other rockets, but it’s not unique. “There’s a long history of what we call hammerhead rockets,” on which the capsule’s diameter is wider than the booster, said McDowell. “If you’re careful, it actually has perfectly fine aerodynamics.”

Just like the tips of passenger and military jets, capsules come in all different shapes, New Shepard’s interior is designed to “maximize the interior volume” to hold six passengers, said Laura Forczyk, the owner of Astralytical, a space analytics company. It also needs a “big, flat bottom” for stable re-entry, McDowell said.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/jul/20/jeff-bezos-rocket-design-an-inquiry
____________________________________________________________
And please, not the obvious.......

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

BannonsLiver

(16,352 posts)
2. I still get a chuckle when the passengers on the rocket are referred to as crew.
Wed Jul 21, 2021, 01:18 PM
Jul 2021

Later this week, I’m “crewing” a flight to Saint Lucia from seat 1A.

I’ll have about as much to do with the technical aspects of the flight as they did yesterday.

 

Dial H For Hero

(2,971 posts)
14. Interestingly, while the first spacecraft to carry a human into orbit (Vostok) had manual controls,
Wed Jul 21, 2021, 01:55 PM
Jul 2021

they were to be used only in an emergency. The flight was controlled entirely by the ground.

Foolacious

(497 posts)
4. I want to know about those huge windows.
Wed Jul 21, 2021, 01:35 PM
Jul 2021

They're amazingly large for a hypersonic craft. How did they do that?

iemanja

(53,029 posts)
5. It looks like the obvious
Wed Jul 21, 2021, 01:44 PM
Jul 2021

Men deliberately build rockets that way. Their goal is to literally penetrate space.

elias7

(3,997 posts)
6. Well, if a woman built it, would it look like a vagina?
Wed Jul 21, 2021, 01:47 PM
Jul 2021

Seriously, how would anyone design a rocket that could not be construed as a phallus.

elias7

(3,997 posts)
16. Triangular? Like a fighter jet. Sort of boob-like...
Wed Jul 21, 2021, 02:00 PM
Jul 2021

Sci-fi crafts are certainly not phallic, but we don’t have that kind of technology, like impulse power and warp speed. Until then, I’m afraid most objects built for getting into space are going to be cylindrical by nature.

iemanja

(53,029 posts)
17. NASA's rockets
Wed Jul 21, 2021, 02:11 PM
Jul 2021

while phallic don't look like a literal bulbus dick. You can't tell me that Bezos' is more aerodynamic than Artemis 1. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-54156798

I'm not an engineer, but I tend to think that if women were in charge of the space program, rockets overall might look different.

iemanja

(53,029 posts)
11. there is an easy solution to that
Wed Jul 21, 2021, 01:50 PM
Jul 2021

They don't need to build the things to look like dicks. This one is more so than a typical rocket.

Wounded Bear

(58,634 posts)
9. The pod is designed to fit on a larger booster, one that would actually go sub-orbital...
Wed Jul 21, 2021, 01:49 PM
Jul 2021

or maybe eventually orbital. Thus, the diameter of the passenger pod is larger than the booster. The current booster is not capable of that, but I assume future designs will be.

All rockets end up being phallic shaped. Some are less 'mushroom-like' but all are cylindrical due to aerodynamics. When he wants to break the 100 mile altitude line he'll need a lot more oomph than that guy. The current one will be suffiecient for more tourist flights like the one yesterday.

brooklynite

(94,489 posts)
10. Because people look for patterns...
Wed Jul 21, 2021, 01:49 PM
Jul 2021

New Sheperd flies, lands and is reusable. I don't care what it looks like.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why does Jeff Bezos's roc...