Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JohnSJ

(92,055 posts)
Thu Jul 22, 2021, 11:18 AM Jul 2021

Some in the media, and elsewhere are mischaracterizing Biden as defending the filibuster

Last edited Thu Jul 22, 2021, 12:28 PM - Edit history (2)

That isn't what he said

While he didn't say directly that the votes for getting rid of the filibuster aren't there, what he effectively said was that because of the current layout of the Senate, fighting to get rid of the filibuster would be a losing battle, and nothing else would get done.

That is what he was saying when he said "it would throw the entire Congress into chaos", and all other legislation would be ignored.

Whether people agree with that or not is debatable I guess, but one thing I am fairly certain of, is that if the Senate were able to get Manchin, Sinema, and all other Democrats aboard to eliminate the filibuster, Biden would absolutely support that.

The reality is this is entirely in the Senate's court. It is up to the Senate to determine this.

Here is the transcript of what Biden said about the filibuster:

"
Biden NEVER SAID:

"ending the filibuster will give Republicans an excuse to do nothing."

That is a LIE, and Politico knows it.

What isn't mentioned in all these discussions, it is the SENATE THAT SETS THE RULES, NOT JOE BIDEN.

Does anyone here really believe that Biden will change the minds of Manchin and Sinema? They both have said under no circumstances would they do that. Manchin went as far as saying that he would NOT even make an exception eliminating the filibuster just for issues involving voting rights.

Here is the Transcript from the Town Hall on the filibuster last night:

"And so it takes -- go to your second point. I've been saying for a long, long time, the abuse of the filibuster is pretty overwhelming. When I got to the United States Senate at a time when we had guys like Jim Eastland and Strom Thurman, and Robert F. Byrd, and a whole range of people who were very, very, very, very, very, very conservative on race, to say the least, even then if you were to filibuster, you had to stand on the floor and hold the floor.

And that's why Strom, I think, set the record at 24 straight hours or something. Don't hold me to the number, but -- you know? So you had to take -- there were significantly fewer filibusters in those days, in the middle of the civil rights movement.

LEMON: Well, let me -- let me talk to you about that. Because--

BIDEN: Well, let me finish my answer, because I'd tell you what I'd do. I would go back to that, where you have to maintain the floor. You have to stand there and talk and hold the floor. You can't just say--

(CROSSTALK)

LEMON: I understand that. But what difference does that -- if you hold the floor for, you know, a day or a year, what difference does it make? Here's the thing for me. You talked about people -- and this is important for people who look like me.

My grandmother would sit around when I was a kid, 5th grade, had a 5th grade education. I learned that she couldn't read when I was doing my homework. And she would tell me stories about people asking her to count the number of jelly beans in the jar--

BIDEN: Yeah.

LEMON: -- or the soap in -- so why is protecting the filibuster, is that more important than protecting voting rights, especially for people who fought and died for that?

(APPLAUSE)

BIDEN: No. It's not. I want to see the United States Congress, the United States Senate, pass S. 1 and S. 4, the John Lewis Act, get them to my desk so I can sign it.

(APPLAUSE)

But here's the deal. What I also want to do, I want to make sure we bring along not just all the Democrats. We bring along Republicans who I know, know better. They know better than this.

And what I don't want to do is get wrapped up right now `in the argument whether or not this is all about the filibuster or -- look, the American public, you can't stop them from voting. You tried last time. More people voted last time than at any time in American history in the middle of the worst pandemic in American history. More people did.

(APPLAUSE)

And they showed up. They're going to show up again. They're going to do it again. But what I want to do is, I'm trying to bring the country together. And I don't want the debate to only be about whether or not we have a filibuster or exceptions to the filibuster or going back to the way the filibuster had to be used before.

LEMON: But isn't that the only way you're going to get it done right now?

BIDEN: No, I don't believe that. I think we can get it done.

LEMON: If you -- you agree with the former president. He has called -- as you called him, your old boss, that it's a relic of Jim Crow.

BIDEN: It is.

LEMON: If it's a relic of Jim Crow, it's been used to fight against civil rights legislation historically, why protect it?

BIDEN: There's no reason to protect it other than you're going to throw the entire Congress into chaos and nothing will get done. Nothing at all will get done. And there's a lot at stake. The most important one is the right to vote. That's the single most important one. And your vote counted and counted by someone who honestly counts it.

But it goes beyond that. For example, wouldn't my friends on the other side love to have a debate about the filibuster instead of passing the Recovery Act? Or wouldn't they love doing it instead of being in a position where we provide for -- how many of you have children under the age of 17? Raise your hand. Guess what? You're getting a lot of money in a monthly check now, aren't you? No, you deserve -- no, no, no, I really mean it.

Republicans used to fight for it, as well. It's called the child tax credit. If you have a child under the age of 7, you get $300 bucks a month, $350 bucks a month. If you have a child under -- between 7 and 17, you get a total of $200 bucks a month. And guess what? It's cutting child poverty in half. In half."

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/politics/2021/07/21/joe-biden-cnn-town-hall-transcript/8051311002/


14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
4. He could come out publicly with a recommendation to modify it.
Thu Jul 22, 2021, 11:32 AM
Jul 2021

He does have influence.

Also, he can work with Pelosi and Schumer to craft bills that will include significant incentives targeted at Manchin, Sinema, and DiFi. If we don't get them to help save democracy, America is toast.

JohnSJ

(92,055 posts)
7. Really. I don't think so. Manchin made it very clear that he wouldn't even eliminate the
Thu Jul 22, 2021, 12:32 PM
Jul 2021

filibuster just for issues involving voting rights.

I don't know if anyone remembers, but Manchin said if Sander got the nomination, he not only wouldn't back Sanders, but consider voting for trump. This isn't someone who is going to be moved by Biden or anyone. The only way this will succeed is if we win enough seats in the Senate to make Manchin, Sinema, and any other Democrat who is against the filibuster irrelevent.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/468278-manchin-says-he-wouldnt-back-sanders-against-trump-in-presidential-race

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
9. He cares only about money and power.
Thu Jul 22, 2021, 12:41 PM
Jul 2021

Buy him off until we can make him irrelevant by taking more seats.

Scruples be damned. This is an existential emergency.

JohnSJ

(92,055 posts)
10. I don't think we can count on that, because he has all the power he needs right now.
Thu Jul 22, 2021, 12:53 PM
Jul 2021

My biggest concern is the state legislatures that have made voting suppression laws that allow those state legislatures to over turn the results of an election.

Unless we can get the SC to view that unConstitutional, we are going to have a very precarious time




lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
11. SCROTUS has already shown they are opposed to voting rights.
Thu Jul 22, 2021, 01:34 PM
Jul 2021

We need a plan to work around SCROTUS, can not expect any help there.

JohnSJ

(92,055 posts)
12. but they haven't ruled on that specific issue, allowing state legislatures to over-turn an election
Thu Jul 22, 2021, 01:39 PM
Jul 2021

That is a very open issue how the court will rule

If they allow that, then we are no longer a democracy




lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
13. There is a lot more to the suppression bills than that one issue.
Thu Jul 22, 2021, 01:43 PM
Jul 2021

Most of the garbage will easily get SCROTUS endorsement, even if (against all odds) SCROTUS rejects that one provision.

JohnSJ

(92,055 posts)
14. That one issue is critical, because it allows a state legislature to overturn election results, even
Thu Jul 22, 2021, 01:58 PM
Jul 2021

if the Governor had certified the election

The other issues make voting difficult, but not impossible

Hekate

(90,497 posts)
6. Thanks for the clarification. I sure had to wade thru the gnashing of teeth and rending of garments
Thu Jul 22, 2021, 12:07 PM
Jul 2021

… to get to your post.

mcar

(42,272 posts)
8. Thank you for this
Thu Jul 22, 2021, 12:36 PM
Jul 2021

The media - and some here - are not correctly interpreting what he said. As you noted, he prefaced it all with:

I would go back to that, where you have to maintain the floor. You have to stand there and talk and hold the floor.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some in the media, and el...