Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,576 posts)
Mon Jul 26, 2021, 12:02 AM Jul 2021

As coronavirus surges, GOP lawmakers are moving to limit public health powers

As coronavirus surges, GOP lawmakers are moving to limit public health powers

By Frances Stead Sellers and Isaac Stanley-Becker at the Washington Post

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/gop-legislatures-health-laws/2021/07/25/2455940c-db54-11eb-8fb8-aea56b785b00_story.html

Today at 6:05 pm

"SNIP.....

Across the country, GOP lawmakers are rallying around the cause of individual freedom to counter community-based disease mitigation methods, moves experts say leave the country ill-equipped to counter the resurgent coronavirus and a future, unknown outbreak.

In some states, anger at perceived overreach by health officials has prompted legislative attempts to limit their authority, including new state laws that prevent the closure of businesses or allow lawmakers to rescind mask mandates. Some state courts have reined in the emergency and regulatory powers governors have wielded against the virus. And in its recent rulings and analysis, the U.S. Supreme Court has signaled its willingness to limit disease mitigation in the name of religious freedom.

“The legal framework has evolved in ways that will complicate and perhaps undermine efforts to deal with the next public health crisis or even routine health threats,” said Wendy Parmet, director of the Northeastern University Center for Health Policy and Law, who also said she has been a “long critic of emergency laws and their potential for abuse.”

A key issue, Parmet and others say, is that the legislative backlash is based on partisan assumptions about this pandemic, limiting states’ options in the face of a new threat.

......SNIP"

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

applegrove

(118,576 posts)
2. They are planning for the pandemics of the future they need to reduce
Mon Jul 26, 2021, 12:48 AM
Jul 2021

poor people. They need bad information to rule completely.

applegrove

(118,576 posts)
4. Yup. God forbid a woman ends up pregnant by someone she soon realizes
Mon Jul 26, 2021, 01:17 AM
Jul 2021

is awful and she needs to separated from permanently to be a good mother to the children from a suitable guy into the future. God forbid a teenager doesn't to go through something too grown-up when they are 16 and give up a child or have her childhood end and become a mom. But eugenics by pandemic- sure.

applegrove

(118,576 posts)
6. Oh hell yes. That is the cruelest thing of all: rape or incest. So misogynistic
Mon Jul 26, 2021, 01:28 AM
Jul 2021

to attack women's choices and rights by banning abortion in all cases but in especially those.

tanyev

(42,540 posts)
7. Yeah, how dare those health officials keep telling us what to do. "Wear masks! Get vaccinated!"
Mon Jul 26, 2021, 08:25 AM
Jul 2021

What are they trying to do, save our lives????

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»As coronavirus surges, GO...