General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGallup Poll Crosstabs - R+22 in the South
Think this matters?
Midwest: O+4
South: R+22
West: O+6
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/17/1145957/-About-that-Gallup-poll
Edit - I didn't post this for South bashing - just pointing out that the devil is in the details on that R +6 tripe they put out...
meow2u3
(25,250 posts)I wonder why? Gallup had to oversample Southern conservatives.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,665 posts)it is the margin between the candidates in the region.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)I'm kinda surprised the margin isn't bigger, considering the region.
Hamlette
(15,556 posts)yes, I know there are some nice people living in the south but really. Way to many redneck racists. Let them go, they can export cotton to us and we can export straight jackets to them.
edhopper
(37,370 posts)but the abolition of slavery was too important. that said, they can leave now if they wish.
One who regards or treats the members of a group (in this case, a region) with hatred and intolerance.
No... we should NOT let them (us) go. There are far too many progressives in the South, who like living here, to push the entire South out. It's bigoted to think otherwise.
Hamlette
(15,556 posts)but whatever. Still, it was an act of treason and we should have let them go. I'll even throw in my state, Utah. A beautiful but politically useless place.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)What "they" did was more than 200 years ago.
What's now is what's now.
Come down here and teach. If you're wealthy enough, buy a news station. Don't sit on your high horse and yell that we should have let one of the prettiest parts of our country go because you're too chicken to get off your ass and fight for it.
I live down here and am damned proud to be a progressive Southern white woman with a half Arabic child and a half Jewish child (race, not religion). You're a bigot for broad-brushing me.
kath
(10,565 posts)Hamlette
(15,556 posts)so I didn't broad-brush you.
Your accusation that I am a bigot is uncalled for. It is also uncalled for to call me chicken or to advise me that I should buy a news station or how to live my life or to imply that saving the South because it is pretty is more important than any work I might be doing where I am. You know nothing about me. You do not know how I live my life. And likewise, I know nothing about you. Which is why I excluded you from my comment about the freaking civil war! (Which was not 200 years ago, just saying.)
Hosnon
(7,800 posts)"I'm not racist, but..."
Same shit, different target.
Hamlette
(15,556 posts)these people are not a protected class because they have a choice. There is no reason for them to be right wing nut jobs. Sheesh, you hare taking tolerance way too far when you say I have to be tolerant of the intolerance that is the majority of the South.
Marr
(20,317 posts)It's bigotry simply to point out demographic information about the South? I'm amazed that someone with such a keen interest in discrimination thinks the Civil War was more than 200 years in the past.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)More like what was done to Japan and Germany after WW II. It should have lasted a minimum of 50 years and been enforced at the point of a bayonet for the entire time.
The Japanese and Germans got the message and became responsible world citizens. Too many in the South - not all, mind you, but too many - never did.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)the South. Thank you for still existing, Electoral College.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)'nuff said.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Or both?
Response to Ruby the Liberal (Original post)
Post removed
Lone_Star_Dem
(28,158 posts)The south has a disproportionate amount of FOX news watching, Limbaugh hate radio meme spewing, knuckle dragging, bigoted, idiot Republicans.
Gallop is over sampling the south, and their polls are showing higher numbers than other polls which don't.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)The four regions are defined by the US census and all the pollsters weight the results so that if a poll has too many easterners or too many southerners in the sample, those responses are increased or decreased in weight to match the known voting age population.
Gallup has a likely voter model that is too republican friendly in all regions. That is the problem.
Lone_Star_Dem
(28,158 posts)My phone wasn't wanting to open the link so I was assuming. Which we all know is never a good idea.
reflection
(6,287 posts)in a sea of red-faced, beady-eyed right-wingers today at work. All of them breathing fire and simultaneously insisting Romney won and that the "Communist News Network" moderator made Romney lose.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)The problem with the poll is that it has Romney up by 6% nationally due to Gallup's particular likely voter screen.
But whatever the right number is, the disparity between the south region and the other regions is huge. Is the true disaprity between south and west 28% total? We don't know... but it's in the 20's. Even if Obama wins in a landslide that difference between the south and everyone else will still be there, except it would be something like WEST O+15 SOUTH R+14.
The census uses four major divisions of the country and pollsters weight their responses by region, so the southern sample is counted as 32% of the total because that is the correct percentage of the electorate in the south (the most populous of the four regions)
Again, I am not saying +22% is correct. I am saying that the huge difference between the south and the other three regions is correct. In a poll Obama is winning a huge regional disparity will remain.
I think it is great news that even in a bad poll Obama is leading in three of the four regions.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,665 posts)This is great news! Even with Florida counted as 'south' the total EC won't make a dent in the total needed. Quite honestly, thats the only state down there that Ds have a shot at.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)Mayland is part of the SOUTH census region.
So MD and competative in VA and FL... and that's it for the south.
The census SOUTH region is every state that had slavery in 1858 except Missouri, and no free states.
(West Virginia broke away from Virginia in the civil war. Maryland was not in the confederacy, but was a slave state.)
Ruby the Liberal
(26,665 posts)cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,665 posts)Surprised to see MD and DE in the south.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)bjhunt
(1 post)Gallup doesn't use the US Census regions but breaks things down their own way. You can find how they divide things up here. Their breakdown is really a bit more intuitive than the Census's; for instance, Gallup puts Maryland in the East.
npk
(3,701 posts)It's only+10 for Romney in the South. Or am I reading that wrong.
nsd
(2,486 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Gallup's regional definitions are as follows:
East -- Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, West Virginia and the District of
South -- Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas
Midwest -- Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, and Kansas
West -- Montana, Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, New Mexico, California, Oregon, Washington, Hawaii and Alaska
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)Our VP would not be happy about that!
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)cordelia
(2,174 posts)pretty quickly.
And you didn't expect it. Uh huh.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)kind of hard to spin these poll numbers positively.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,665 posts)Which you will see as soon as we are off defcon and the 'edit' comes back to the posts, so step off.
Love,
Ruby who is from the South
cordelia
(2,174 posts)and I stand by what I said.
You knew as well as anyone that this would turn into yet another tedious South bashing thread.
Got your wish.
Floyd_Gondolli
(1,277 posts)I live in Oklahoma which Gallup classifies as the south. Born and raised. Frankly this state and the region as a whole deserve whatever criticism it gets.
Yes, there are some progressives here and there, and we are all brave and gritty to endure living among cretins, but the region is a lost cause politically.
I'll never see another Dem governor in my state in my lifetime and I could live another 50 years. Ditto for the house and senate. I could live to be older than Moses and this state still wouldn't have medical marijuana.
Our state Democratic party is a lesson in ineptitude and has been for 15 years, at least. Our GOP legislature actually kicked around legislation to ban the use of fetuses for food in its last session. The could literally nominate a ham sandwich and the sandwich would carry my state on election day by a comfortable margin. And that's not meant to be a joke, unfortunately.
I get why people are sensitive about it but the reality is I dream of the day I get out of this shit hole for good, and I think most who share this burden would say the same thing if they were honest with themselves.
Lex
(34,108 posts)I mean, we're looking at the Electoral College votes adding up, right?
Not that the R's have super strong support in states that aren't going to go to O anyway.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,665 posts)over Gallup +6 for Rmoney today. The answers are in the crosstab details.
maxrandb
(17,428 posts)Good!
Not "south bashing", but I spent "a year one six months" in Pascagoula, MS with the Navy. I "used" to think Karachi, Pakistan was a shithole!
tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,665 posts)www.accuweather.com
One of the reasons I miss living down there.
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)Terra Alta
(5,158 posts)The South does have a reputation for being full of rednecks, hicks, and hillbillies, but there are quite a few intelligent liberals here, and we're doing the best we can to get our states to swing blue.
Lex
(34,108 posts)What a bullshit thing to say. Like Romney's 47% comment.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)Utah and Idaho. They just happened to be counterbalanced by CA, OR, WA, and oddly NV.
Suji to Seoul
(2,035 posts)Southern States, by most accounts, have done little to progress the progress of this country.
Amazing to me that some of the poorest states in the country are some of the reddest states in the country, that take from the blue states, then complain about government handouts. Mississippi, Kentucky, West Virginia, Alabama, South Carolina. . .go figure.
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Who cares if Romney wins OK, AR, MS, LA, AL by landslides.. the EC vote is the same.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)with high populations, Romney hasn't a chance of winning.
Unless they steal the election with those new electronic voting machines made by BAIN that they are using in Ohio this election!
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Ohio is the President best friend right now. A win in Ohio covers for possible loses in other swing states.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)in terms of electoral votes? Obama can and will win quite easily without most of the South. He can win Florida and Virginia; the rest of the South is irrelevant in terms of electoral outcome (and it's state level polling and not national polling that really matters).
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Romney could win every single vote in the deep SC, GA, MS,AL,KY,TN,AR,LA,TX and all that means is 126 votes.
Right now I have obama with 247 solid electoral votes so if OBama finds another 23 votes somewhere then he wins.