General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums*****BREAKING***** 57% of California voters plan to vote against Republican led recall
Link to tweet
Elessar Zappa
(14,046 posts)Send in those ballots, California Dems!
Polly Hennessey
(6,804 posts)JohnSJ
(92,382 posts)ColinC
(8,329 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Returned Ballots So Far
58% Democrats
22% Indys
21% Reps.
Based on polling 80-85% of Democrats, 40% of Indys, and 10% of Republicans are voting against the recall. If they stopped counting today No is between 58-60%.
JohnSJ
(92,382 posts)ailsagirl
(22,899 posts)More_Cowbell
(2,191 posts)So they know how many Democrats and Republicans have returned ballots.
ailsagirl
(22,899 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)However they update the number of ballots returned by registration every day. I took those numbers and matched them to polls.
ailsagirl
(22,899 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,704 posts)roamer65
(36,747 posts)Now is the time for a ballot prop to change the recall process.
ace3csusm
(969 posts)This cost us CA residents millions for what...and the whole idea that 50.1% is needed stay...change this NOW...
Jim__
(14,083 posts)Demovictory9
(32,475 posts)#!$@ larry elder
Vinca
(50,303 posts)sense if 49% could vote to not recall the governor which would trigger his ouster and the highest point getter of the losers running against him to get the job. They might have a lousy 15% of the vote. 49% loses, 15% wins. What a stupid, stupid provision in the California constitution.
Retired Engineer Bob
(759 posts)RockRaven
(14,992 posts)PLEASE.
NewsCenter28
(1,835 posts)Keep GOTV, CA! I love ya!
Cha
(297,618 posts)Retired Engineer Bob
(759 posts)Grokenstein
(5,727 posts)We've been through this nonsense before, and we know what's at stake this time.
BigmanPigman
(51,626 posts)NoMoreRepugs
(9,456 posts)be replaced, well, u can do the math.
Auggie
(31,186 posts)chowder66
(9,077 posts)I sent my on August 17th and have been watching for an update from ballotrax but nothing as of yet.
budkin
(6,714 posts)budkin
(6,714 posts)Diane Feinstein is ancient And the governor would get to choose a replacement for her
aggiesal
(8,923 posts)I've already turned in my "NO" ballot at the ROV in SD.
Get out and vote. The earlier the better.
cally
(21,596 posts)BlueCheeseAgain
(1,654 posts)Nonetheless, early returns show Dems returning ballots at a fast clip.
Moebym
(989 posts)If you recall your governor and replace him with that bozo, I will not visit your state again until you correct your error.
California Kid
(24 posts)kimbutgar
(21,186 posts)These polls make people feel like its ok if I dont vote Newsom cant be recalled. NO
Vote no and drop off your ballot. I dont trust the USPS under Dejoy it comes to ballots. I am waiting for our son to come home and well drive down to the department of elections and drop off our ballots for our family.
bucolic_frolic
(43,280 posts)you believe those polled will vote, don't lie to pollsters, and are a representative sample of what will actually occur on recall election day, and if you believe this poll result doesn't motivate those losing and diminish the resolve of those winning in the poll.
So I say all those things interplay and 7% has historically been within the margin of the GOP making most elections very close, althought don't extend any insight here for any experience monitoring or seeing results from California elections.
IronLionZion
(45,523 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Those polls you cited are considerably older and don't capture Newsom's ads and the CA Denocratic machine turning out its voters
IronLionZion
(45,523 posts)Dems don't always turn out for these things as much as the other side
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Tommy Carcetti
(43,198 posts)Just curious.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)NullTuples
(6,017 posts)It's a broken system.
It's been in place for a hundred years and here's the best part: nobody knows how, precisely, it became law. Oh, they know the general story about "progressives" but not who submitted those specific details of the mechanism, or why.
Time to modernize it.
bluestarone
(17,030 posts)WE NEED YOU!!!! DO NOT let the rethugs get away with anything here!!
UTUSN
(70,730 posts)NullTuples
(6,017 posts)Ballot envelopes are on the entranceway table, for whichever of us ventures out masked & keeping our distance into the world first.
SpankMe
(2,966 posts)Polls have been very inaccurate over the last couple of national and local elections.
Plus, I'd have hoped for numbers closer to 68% No, 28% Yes and 4% undecided. I can't believe that anyone outside of the bottom-feeding Republican contingent would even consider a recall.
LiberalFighter
(51,081 posts)nycbos
(6,037 posts)DSandra
(999 posts)By disgruntled business owners who care more about themselves than about spreading COVID. Governors should not be punished for making hard, brave choices when there are no possible choices that dont hurt anyone.
ailsagirl
(22,899 posts)ailsagirl
(22,899 posts)Frankly, I'm surprised that 42% support it... WTH??
mountain grammy
(26,648 posts)42% are batshit crazy and they must be outvoted!
The Unmitigated Gall
(3,830 posts)FU Larry, FU Caitlyn.
That is all.
summer_in_TX
(2,748 posts)Polling has had some big fails lately.
Keep that full court press, California Dems! I'm rooting for you!
Sympthsical
(9,108 posts)That's one of those questions in statistics that can give an unreliable result due to "social acceptance" bias.
People will say they voted when they didn't. They'll say they will when they have no intention.
We saw a lot of this in Trump polling. People just didn't want to admit they were voting for the guy.
The methodology is also a self-selected sample via social media ads funneled through survey monkey, which is its own whole set of statistical bias problems.
I'm (very) cautiously optimistic about the recall lately. Already sent in our "no" votes here. But, I am nowhere near comfortable. Glancing at this outlier and how they came to these numbers doesn't make me feel any better.
Think they wanted some headlines.