General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (Cousin Dupree) on Fri Aug 27, 2021, 07:13 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
bottomofthehill
(9,390 posts)To me, its the vaccine.
48656c6c6f20
(7,638 posts)I'v dcidd the lttr * is a right wing jab and will nvr us an * again. I will not b jabbd by right-wing nut jobs.
musette_sf
(10,487 posts)The British have called what we call "shots", "jabs", for quite some time.
ananda
(35,145 posts)I don't really care.
Celerity
(54,409 posts)In many nations.
smdh
Cousin Dupree
(1,866 posts)for a different perspective.
leftstreet
(40,681 posts)The posters find it offensive
So is anything offensive RW lingo?
FBaggins
(28,706 posts)You don't get to invent a fictional RW source just to buttress your own preference for a given term.
If someone doesn't like "shot" for an injection that fine... but it would be similarly ridiculous to make up a claim that the word is meant to be disrespectful and comes from RW gun nuts trying to boost firearms sales.
hlthe2b's later response is a more reasonable position (if perhaps overly energized)
Celerity
(54,409 posts)is NOT a RW construct and people are free to choose to use the term. You are trying to arbitrarily become the judge and jury of what is proper and what is not.
Being London raised, and now living in Sweden, (and FAR from limited to just those nations) the term jab is old and so not RW. People would laugh in your face if you insinuated they were RW or using RW constructs simply for by calling a vax a jab. The same holds true for many American's use of that colloquialism.
Do you take issue with calling it a shot? A stick? This entire thing is such a non starter and an attempt, IMHO, to unnecessarily spin up conflict.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)Nurses all over my family -- it's your MMR jab, your flu stick, your Dolly jab, etc.
The OP is being odd about this.
You weren't rude at all.
Celerity
(54,409 posts)thanks for the reply
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)She helped fund the Moderna vax, so folks affectionately call it the Dolly Jab.
Celerity
(54,409 posts)Sympthsical
(10,969 posts)obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)It has been called that in the US for forever. It is not RW.
And, Celerity wasn't being rude. Perhaps you are.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)You and your sidekick, on the other hand, have repeatedly been rude to those who disagree with you on this point.
Why so important to make everyone think like you? We all have different opinions here. This seems like a vey odd hill on which to die.
cinematicdiversions
(1,969 posts)Seriously this is kinda sad and kinda hilarious.
Reminds me of that Black Hole is racist kerfuffle from a few years back.
George II
(67,782 posts)....has absolutely no political connotations or hints or anything. It's a term used frequently. Stick is even more common, especially among diabetics.
My wife was a nurse for 40+ years, she and coworkers often used it.
Response to Cousin Dupree (Original post)
targetpractice This message was self-deleted by its author.
XanaDUer2
(15,772 posts)shots sounds violent
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)Do people think it is "cute?" That such crude reference to a very miraculous preventative is respectful to the professionals who have worked around the clock to develop and administer it?
I correct HCWs working with me who refer to "the jab" or "a stick" or other ridiculously immature terms. As far as I am concerned if you are going to work in the health "profession," then be professional. It is an inoculation or a vaccination or an immunization or an injection--even a "dose" or a "booster."
To those upstream denouncing the OP for this post, I really don't care who tells me to "chill out." This is my profession and it makes a damned difference. If you don't approach it in a professional manner, why would we expect the lay public to take us seriously? (Not to mention all the fearful, for whom "jab" or "stick" is hardly going to lower their anxiety.
Call it what you will. But, if you work in health care or give a damn about encouraging others to take the vaccination then, you earn my contempt by doing so..
Cousin Dupree
(1,866 posts)Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58317261
Covid jab response low for some immunosuppressed people
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58340779
Covid jab side-effects 'mild' for at-risk children
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/08/26/parents-demand-final-say-whether-children-get-covid-jab/
Parents demand final say over whether children get Covid jab
That is why speakers of British English, such as longtime DUer Malaise, use "jab"
https://upload.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=15412363
Star Member malaise (234,347 posts)
5. Will have my second jab on June 1
Stay safe
or how about:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100215208263#post25
mzmolly (49,541 posts)
25. I had my jab today and was told I can take tylenol or ibuprofen etc. if needed.
I'm sorry, but I really want to hear how you've been gritting your teeth and taking offense at a 234K count DU poster who consistently uses the word "jab", consistent with the British English environment in which she was raised.
Lots of people use "jab" for "shot", and the mere fact one may not live in a diverse area where one picks up on these differences is not a reason for offense.
It is regionally-dependent, just like "soda" and "pop" and countless other word choices that reflect the influences to which one has been exposed.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)Both in my family, as friends, and professionally. The supermajority call it a stick or jab. My Ph.D. NP with 30 years experience calls it a stick. She is very active in SOFL Dem politics. I need to tell her she is offensive and a RW construct.
You are woefully off base here.
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)Not professional either, but they believe it ingratiates themselves or brings relatability to their patients. Fine. I do believe in "knowing your audience."
But, using terms that instill anxiety in those already reluctant to receive the immunization, such as "jabs" or "sticks" or "needle-jab" instead of professional terms is problematic.
One can defend anything. Certainly.
I am fortunate to work among much more professional individuals who are very cognizant of the unintentional harm we can do.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)Backing away........
Bless your heart.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)She insulted me too, which I find odd just for a difference in opinion.
o
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Why did you feel the need to insult me and others on this thread?
Simply because we didnt agree with you?
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)It happens to us all.
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)It's a really, really rough day.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Ive had a few myself!
Surprised Ive not gotten one from that poster!
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)To let them know that they are ignoring the recipient thereof?
Doesn't that defeat the purpose?
ShazzieB
(22,590 posts)That is not an injection, as you know, because you're taking something out instead of injecting something into the body. Is it okay to say "blood draw" or is that also too colloquial? I'm not being 100% facetious here. I really don't know what the technical term is for this procedure; I've never heard it called anything other than "needle stick" or "blood draw."
To be honest, I think trying to control what common words people use to describe commonplace things is an exercise in futility and a recipe for frustration. Use the words you think best, sure, but when you start lecturing other people about what words they "should" be using, all you're going to do is make enemies. That's simply the truth of the matter.
Granted, there are some language battles that are very worth fighting, such as calling people out for using language that is racist, homophobic, transphobic, sexist, ageist, ableist, etc. But to admonish someone for using words like "jab," "shot," "poke," "stick," or even "stab" to describe a needle being LITERALLY being inserted INTO their body is, well, silly, to be quite honest. Everybody knows what an injection is. Everybody knows there's a needle involved.The word you call it by doesn't change a thing.
TxGuitar
(4,340 posts)When trying to start an IV or draw blood will comment whether or not someone was a good or bad stick (referring to how easy it was to find a vein)?
I don't understand how in the world someone could be offended by this.
ShazzieB
(22,590 posts)This whole thing is baffling to me!
Response to hlthe2b (Reply #8)
Cousin Dupree This message was self-deleted by its author.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Its not against the vaccine. Jesus, people really look for stuff to be outraged about. Smh.
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)And re-read my post above.
Celerity
(54,409 posts)vast majority of the time, but I understand and respect the fact that this is an American board, so refrain from using them here.
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)Nor some others given the arguments being made. Just saying...
Celerity
(54,409 posts)to you just now. I have made no statements here that suggest a lack of understanding.
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)Celerity
(54,409 posts)And don't try to fob off 'jab' as some nefarious British invasion, nor that it is some RW construct.
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)medical professionals to be using at the very time we are trying to instill both confidence in the vaccine and medical professionals and to lower the anxiety level among those hesitant and perhaps, injection/needle-fearing. I have given of my spare time greatly to administer vaccines at mass clinics in Colorado as have many of my colleagues. I have skin in the game and I care about getting everyone we possibly can vaccinated.
Self-defeating strategies are not those I'm going to support. I don't give a GD who says it among the lay public or media. It is not helpful. I am in a position to KNOW, firsthand. Your very self-serving objection aside, this matters.
Celerity
(54,409 posts)force your own personal dislike unto others and thus to universalise your judgement.
Response to Celerity (Reply #67)
Post removed
Celerity
(54,409 posts)Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Just sayin.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)This thread is a hoot.
Celerity
(54,409 posts)via loaded political framing. In addition, other attempts trying to make to take one example of British v American vernacular and then broaden that out via implied negative association to include something (in this case jab) else that a few do not like.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)At least amongst my many healthcare friends and family, and Moderna has been called the Dolly Jab for months and months, in an affectionate way, since Dolly Parton helped fund it.
This thread is odd.
Celerity
(54,409 posts)I should have added that many US healthcare workers use that colloquial descriptive as well. Sorry for not being more clear.
Sympthsical
(10,969 posts)I lived in England for a number of years, and I'm completely blanking.
Unless it's tosser, which doesn't have an American equivalent, so I don't think you'd censor for that.
leftstreet
(40,681 posts)probably T_ _ T
has a w and an a in there somewhere
Celerity
(54,409 posts)We pronounce it differently (as I am sure you know) than Americans do (for us Brits it rhymes rhymes with prat, another word we use a lot, along with git, nob, wanker, numpty, divvy, etc etc etc, and the lovely Scots expressions bawbag, shitehawk, bampot, rocket etc etc) and use it much more frequently, and again, mostly directed against men (think BoJo, lol).
as for tosser
I would say Americans use jack-off or jag-off (was told that is a Chicago thing) in lieu of tosser.
The globalisation of mass media and entertainment, especially via the internet, means lot more regional and/or nation-state specific cultural vernacular and colloquialisms are shared and used than just a few decades ago.
Sympthsical
(10,969 posts)I don't hear Americans use that word ever. And while it does have a vulgar genital connotation here, I think it's pretty aged out for the most part. I only see the British use, and even then that's mostly on places like Reddit where the user probably is British.
Straining to think if I've ever heard someone from my generation use it to refer to genitals. I mean, probably. But so uncommon as to be almost non-existent.
Now I want to start calling people that. It's a fun word to say!
Jag-off was definitely one of my father's favorite terms. I still use jag instead of jack. We're both deeply Chicagoan types. Gotta say it with the accent!
Celerity
(54,409 posts)pronger, pego, etc etc etc.
Not an insult term, but I often use jacobs for testicles/balls/nuts
He caught the old bovver boots right in jacobs.
it London cockney rhyming slang
Jacob's Crackers (rhymes with knackers) and knackers is slang for balls
Coventina
(29,731 posts)Just adding to the general silliness of this thread...
Celerity
(54,409 posts)Coventina
(29,731 posts)Saw them twice.
Sadly, will never get to see them again....
muriel_volestrangler
(106,212 posts)Treefrog
(4,170 posts)I have a cousin who is a retired nurse in Ireland, and shes used that term forever. A younger cousin is a nurse in Wales; she also uses the term.
Neither is right wing, and Ive never heard either use the c word. Omg, still laughing here.
Response to Treefrog (Reply #54)
Post removed
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Why is this so important to you? Why is it vital that others agree with you? Obviously they dont.
if you dont like the word, dont say it. Cant imagine getting so upset over a word like jab.
Response to Treefrog (Reply #74)
hlthe2b This message was self-deleted by its author.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Doubling down with another attack my, my, my.
Response to Treefrog (Reply #78)
hlthe2b This message was self-deleted by its author.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Hmm?
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)XanaDUer2
(15,772 posts)and I call it a "jab" on my Facebook, I posted "got my first jab".
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Amazing someone is so upset about it.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Ain't seen nothin' like it since the melodramatic and dogmatic insistence over use of 'Afghani ' in a sentence.
Six of one, half a dozen of the other... So amazing. So upset.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Nah. Staying right here.
BannonsLiver
(20,595 posts)Treefrog
(4,170 posts)This thread is a blast!
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)Back when, you know, people who didn't grow up in the United States still managed to live here and get by with the English they learned as a youth.
And back when I used to smoke.
He'd pop his head around the corner and say "... mate?", I'd say "yes", and people would wonder where we were sneaking off and to do what.
He's a US citizen now, like many people who live in the US, have opinions, and express them on message boards.
cinematicdiversions
(1,969 posts)Skittles
(171,716 posts)nope
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)Malaise, from Jamaica, is more influenced by British English than American English. Note:
https://upload.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=15412363
Star Member malaise (234,347 posts)
5. Will have my second jab on June 1
Stay safe
It's common, and I doubt Malaise is a right wing mole of some kind.
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)I will not address comments I never made.
Address your comment to the person who made the statement you disagree with.
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)You grit your teeth and have contempt for people ""who refer to "the jab" or "a stick" or other ridiculously immature terms."
People who use "jab" "earn my contempt by doing so."
Now, I'm sure you can Google (user) (word) site:democraticunderground.com with the best of us, or even "jab covid site:democraticunderground.com" and come up with a long list of persons on DU who whether having a Caribbean British-English language background, or Irish or UK or Indian background, of simply by exposure to persons who do, such as the entirety of British-English media, fall into the category of people who use "jab" because it is a common word for "shot" in British English and its progeny throughout the greater English-speaking world. I'll bet Ozzies, Kiwis and Kenyans do it too, and probably a fair number of Canadians.
I did not mean to pick on Malaise, but I simply guessed that "jab" would probably be her preferred word because English speakers in the Caribbean tend more to British English than American English, seasoned of course by the local patois.
It's a big country with people from lots of places in it. Some say "soda" and some say "pop". Some have a "sub", some have a "hero", some have a "po boy" and some have a "grinder", and some folks even use these words for two to three different types of sandwich.
Simply because you are not familiar with the common use of "jab" which is certainly less scary than getting "shot", is no reason to hold others, particularly fellow DUers, in contempt.
ShazzieB
(22,590 posts)steve2470
(37,481 posts)My situation was similar, when I was working. People would commonly say "crazy" or "nuts', etc when the proper terms were Bipolar or psychotic or schizophrenic, etc.
I chose not to confront people. I felt like I would be King Canute ordering the sea to retreat. However, I respect your choice and have no criticism or advice.
BannonsLiver
(20,595 posts)For example I could see how someone with bipolar or other mental illnesses might be hurt or offended by the liberal use of the words crazy and nuts. Im not seeing how a syringe could be offended by being called a jab.
steve2470
(37,481 posts)I can understand that point of view. She chooses to confront others on it. I don't think she is saying or implying the syringe is "offended" but more that injection-wary people might be affected. I think I have her opinion correct. If not, please correct me, hl2b.
I chose just to accept the very common fact of the usage of "nuts", "nutjob", "crazy", etc. I am sure other mental health professionals chose to confront.
muriel_volestrangler
(106,212 posts)to make it seem more 'everyday'. I don't think it's right to confront anyone on using informal expressions online. If a particular patient seems like they'd prefer to keep the vocabulary medical and exact, then that would be a good idea in that case.
leftstreet
(40,681 posts)You gave a thoughtful response in terms of professionalism
But the OP also claims it's "RW lingo." Since you didn't address that, your response can seem like an endorsement of the entire statement
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)bring up as a convenient strawman. It is disingenuous and not worthy of you.
leftstreet
(40,681 posts)You thanked the OP, so yes your response seemed like an endorsement of his/her entire statement
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)My original post speaks for itself.
BannonsLiver
(20,595 posts)It certainly was not well informed.
leftstreet
(40,681 posts)Fair enough
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)And the sub.
It is a RW slur & whether or not it's used differently overseas is irrelevant.
This has been explained
It's not a "RW slur," it's a term you personally noticed a troll using on DU
If you notice a troll using "petrol" instead of "gas," will you deem petrol a RW slur?
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)But I know for a fact that it is.
Nothing has "been explained" either. Just argued.
leftstreet
(40,681 posts)explains a lot about DU actually...
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Just used my time on du to insult me, or so he thinks.
I find post count and time on the forum insults to be incredibly lame.
But, coming from someone on MIRT, I should feel chastised I guess?
Ive lurked here for many years, and I have NEVER seen a MIRT member even refer to being such except in a helpful manner. No words.
XanaDUer2
(15,772 posts)I lost over 10,000 posts when I came back. Started back at zero.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Ive noticed when people use that insult. Usually because theyve got nothing else.
Funny in a way, but I find this guy being on MIRT to be showing a prejudice which is troubling.
XanaDUer2
(15,772 posts)Jim G.
(14,814 posts)Not me. It's not a secret or something I'm embarrassed about;
Response to Jim G. (Reply #193)
XanaDUer2 This message was self-deleted by its author.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)" I have NEVER seen a MIRT member even refer to being..."
Well, that settles it.
Boomerproud
(9,292 posts)Treefrog
(4,170 posts)A wee bit too much.
People disagree with me all the time. Its a discussion board!
DeeNice
(579 posts)When I was waiting for my turn at the vaccine I was saying if i knew the number they would call me from I'd change the ringtone to that Burger King commercial jingle. People literally dropping everything to go when the signal came, that's how I felt.
As far as calling it a jab as a dig...meh. They play all kinds of word games but I don't think this one really sticks (hehehe).
vercetti2021
(10,481 posts)They can go jab a fist up their ass.
Wounded Bear
(64,324 posts)Dream Girl
(5,111 posts)Tadpole Raisin
(1,977 posts)down our conversations with the public. You never know how a new way of saying something will end up being an innocent slang or twisted to something dark and mean.
Cute (short for acute) meant sharp or quick witted.
Gay used to mean happy
Flirt meant sneer at
Aydes was a weight reducing candy
Spinster was a woman who spun yarn.
Some things we cant change but Id like to avoid dumbing down a word used in a professional context even if the average person just lazily wants a shorter word thats easier to put in a tweet.
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)Since anti-vax nuttery is international in scope, and since many non-native speakers of English learn British English instead of American English, then I have simply assumed that "jab" was born of the same internet swamps which drove Brexit and foment other separatist and alliance-weakening causes.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)No idea where you got that.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)It is NOT a RW term. It's been around forever, esp in the UK, but also in the US. My mother is a retired nurse, and she always called that, and she is more liberal than most folks who post here.
Good grief.
steve2470
(37,481 posts)Nothing disrespectful at all about it.
irisblue
(37,512 posts)maybe early spring 2021?
Politicub
(12,328 posts)Getting a vaccine injection is something a responsible citizen has done without complaint about a word that a lot of people use as shorthand.
And, like others have pointed out, its British. Maybe you should read it with a British accent in your minds eye. Anything read in a British accent is cooler
or more posh.
CrackityJones75
(2,403 posts)Last edited Fri Aug 27, 2021, 01:27 PM - Edit history (1)
The side distractions here on any number of things daily is a comedy routine.
Now we get to have a super long thread about whether or not the term jab is offensive.
Are you kidding me? I am sensitive to peoples sensitivities and all that but honestly sometimes if it isnt humorous it is absolutely exhausting around here.
NewJeffCT
(56,848 posts)I don't use "jab" or "the jab" at all, but had no idea it was meant to be disrespectful.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)And, it absolutely isn't "RW lingo."
Polybius
(21,901 posts)I see that all the time here too.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Even used by one of the most upset on this thread!
Sapient Donkey
(1,568 posts)And using it sort of became a way of taking away its power as some sort of jab against it.
treestar
(82,383 posts)I use it and never thought it was supposed to be bad. They embraced it as "Obama cares." Which the Republicans sure don't.
iemanja
(57,757 posts)It is not RW.
Iggo
(49,928 posts)Its everyday British slang and has been for years.
MenloParque
(566 posts)Thank you! I had no clue that my primary care doctor for the last 25 years is a Right wing nut job!! He calls any shot I get a JAB, be it a flu, pneumonia, or Pfizer. I will be switching docs ASAP. Thank you for this info!!
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)And it definitely is meant to be derogatory when they post it.
Regardless of how the English & Irish use it the OP does have a point.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)That doesnt even make sense.
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)If it doesn't make sense to you I guess that's on you.
How is the word "Democrat" derogatory? I suppose the way it's used.
Ms. Toad
(38,639 posts)People tent to opine about whether others are right wing trolls when they disagree with them - frequently about things on which progressives are not united.
And, since "jab" isn't directed at a minorty who would have a right to tell us to stop insulting them, whether it is used in a derogatory manner is also opinion.
It's a commonly used word in much of the world, and since we are far less isolated than we used to be, vernacular that is common in other parts of the world - used on the internet - especially when the subject of that word is a hot topic - are likely to spread.
Drawing a line in the sand about innocuous words make us look silly.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Wish I could rec this post.
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)I was talking about a RW troll. One that was banned here just this morning. And many other times this month & countless times over the years.
When they use "the jab" referring to the covid vaccine it is meant as a slur. Context matters.
Ms. Toad
(38,639 posts)So still opinion, unless the ban message declared why they were banned.
Interpreting context is opinion, not fact.
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)And many, many, many times before. They are an anti-vax, ant-mask, anti-Biden troll that uses "the jab" as a slur.
Fact.
Response to Jim G. (Reply #106)
Post removed
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)A rough count has this RW troll being banned 42 times this month by a number of people on MIRT, as well as several times by the admins & by OTTO.
So, not some rogue "Lone Ranger" here.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Seems bad form.
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)But you're welcome to try & change the subject.
Again, whether that term is used commonly overseas or not, RW'ers use it here as a slur. I know it to be a fact.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Nah.
And i Nd your talking about MIRT matters to be really bad form. Never seen a MIRT member do that.
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)I said it is used as a slur by RW'ers. And here, just this morning for that matter.
So you're welcome to keep arguing about something I know you to be wrong about.
And I'm not really interested in your six months of experience at DU.
Response to Jim G. (Reply #158)
Post removed
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)Or just perceived as one?
And I didn't bring MIRT into the conversation, someone else did. And I didn't mention anything specific about anyone, just the fact that that term has been used numerous times here as a slur. Today as a matter of fact.
And I'm not embarrassed about anything having to do with MIRT. It's not a secret who's on there either - it's listed on the Announcements Page whenever there's a changeover.
So, what is your purpose continuing to argue with me about this? Do you believe you're going to change my mind about something I know to be a fact, or do you think you're going to bait me into breaking the TOS somehow & have a post removed? Either way you're going to be disappointed.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)I find those kinds of barbs incredibly weak and lame. So why would you mention it, hmm?
Interesting.
I have no interest in changing your mind. Youve made it clear that you think anyone who uses e term jab is a rw troll. I would think an open mind would be a requirement for MIRT.
Bye now. Have a blessed day JimG of MIRT!
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)I said that term is used as a RW slur. As recently as today. Here.
Show me anywhere I've said everyone who says that is using it as a slur. Google "Red Herring". (Hint - not the fish)
Kingofalldems
(40,278 posts)He keeps coming back daily.
These threads make DU look stupid
But that's probably the intention
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)Jim G.
(14,814 posts)But in reality, pretty much.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Did I just insult myself? Odd you find that a slur.
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)That's how RW'ers use it as a slur.
Thanks for playing.
Tell us some more about your job with MIRT. Were all agog.
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)I don't imagine anyone here knows anything that you don't know. They couldn't possibly.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)And only been here six months.
Who brought that up as a subject change? Put down the shovel.
Kingofalldems
(40,278 posts)Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Free DU! Down with MIRT!
Celerity
(54,409 posts)including healthcare professionals, use the term jab. There is zero ill intent on their part. This entire projection by the OP is built upon a foundation of sand, as are the attempts to try and drive division via an 'othering' of the usage and origins of the colloquialism.
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)I happen to be.
Celerity
(54,409 posts)Anti-vaxxers are anti-vax regardless of what they call the shot/stick/jab/vax. Their occasional use of jab adds no weight to their shitbaggery, they are fucksticks whatever terms they use.
This OP was woven out of whole cloth from the start, it was attempted power projection (the attempt at universalising a purely personal opinion) and control via dodgy language policing based upon false constructs.
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)From my personal experience. If you're not willing to accept it that's okay. Doesn't change anything.
Celerity
(54,409 posts)The OP attempts to universalise a construct that is in no way, shape or form universally valid, as shown by a myriad number of replies that show the attempted construct and the attempted word policing to be invalid.
Your anecdotal exceptions/examples do not prove the universal rule/claim to be valid, they do not make your or the OP's statements true.
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)If I've seen trolls use that term as a slur here that somehow makes it an exception?
It would also seem our anecdotal experience with that one troll overlap. Remember a private conversation we had recently? MI6?
Celerity
(54,409 posts)One psycho (the one you told me about in PM) troll using repetitive rantings and a multiplicity of burner DU accounts does not prove the positing of the OP as universal, nor does it make it valid. It just proves they (that troll) are a persistent and determined POS with very little to do with themselves.
No one claimed it was "universal" just that it's a term RW'ers use a pejorative.
Ands it's not just the one you had the displeasure of coming in contact with either. I've seen it used as a slur by several trolls.
The OP (who says they're a nurse), another DUer (who said they were a nurse) & myself have all seen it. How is that so hard to rap your head around?
Celerity
(54,409 posts)Also, the OP is attempting to make 'jab' a word that is seen as RW, anti-vax slur, which would universally ban it from DU if that false stance was adopted.
I hate seeing it used on DU."
That's what the OP said.
Since others are also aware of that, they aren't "attempting to make 'jab' a word that is seen as RW, anti-vax slur" they are merely pointing out it is being used that way by RW'ers.
So I guess if you didn't know that then the OP must have just made it up? To what purpose?
At least three other people have said the same thing in this thread, so it must be some sort of mass hysteria now. Either that or some here just prefer to argue about things outside their knowledge base.
Celerity
(54,409 posts)Jim G.
(14,814 posts)Now that I know you're never mistaken, among other things.
Celerity
(54,409 posts)only opinions.
It was only an opinion by the OP, one that was attempted to be foisted upon the board as some sort of posited rule as to what is acceptable and what is not, in terms of vernacular communication and discourse.
I disagree with that opinion.
Also, I never once claimed infallibility on anything,
which this sarcastic response from you implies I did:
It was something the OP was aware of that you obviously weren't. I confirmed it, as did others in this thread. If you choose to deny it, either we're liars or you're wrong.
I'm glad you can at least recognize sarcasm.
You have personal experience with a rightwing troll who used the term "jab" to describe an injection. You can't possibly extrapolate that to the entire DU community and assume any member who says "jab" is a troll.
One hopes, as a MIRT member
, you used other criteria to determine the person was a troll, and just happened to notice through your keen observations that s/he used "jab" a lot.
Wait...do you think maybe the troll was posting from Britain?
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)I mentioned one that was as recent as this morning using it as a slur. I didn't say that was a one-off though.
And I never claimed everyone who says it is using it as a slur, just that some RW'ers do.
I understand how it's hard to accept something outside one's experience.
And feel free to continue to try & insult me. I'm sure it'll wear me down eventually.
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)Treefrog
(4,170 posts)This thread keeps on giving!
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Treefrog
(4,170 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Watch (or listen to) BBC or SkyNews and you'll hear it all the time. Read the UK press and they use it too.
What leads you to believe that it's "RW lingo" ... I was not aware of that. Is that your sole opinion, or is there a consensus developing in that regard?
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... if not sole, then an isolated one.
I had already "trashed" this thread so that I don't see it continually rising to the top of the forum. But when you commented, the "My Posts" tab turned yellow... so I figured I'd check in to see who disagrees with me. (I'm glad it was you instead... with your observations about the majority consensus.)
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)I really thought it was a joke to begin with!
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)That's perfect.
milestogo
(23,084 posts)BannonsLiver
(20,595 posts)Including that bastion of RWNJ politics the BBC.
Brits came up with this term, I don't think it means any disrespect.
Caliman73
(11,767 posts)At least according to this WSJ article as discussed by linguist Ben Zimmer.
Sorry that the full article is hidden behind a pay wall.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/jab-a-british-term-for-a-covid-19-shot-but-born-in-the-u-s-a-11617898298#:~:text=As%20a%20verb%20and%20noun,began%20in%20the%20U.S.%2C%20however.
Metatron
(1,260 posts)But despite the markedly British flavor of jab in current usage, the origins of the hypodermic meaning are actually American.
As a verb and noun for a poke or thrust, jab first entered English in the early 19th century as a Scottish variant for job, which at that point could refer to the pecking of a bird. Its colloquial use for an injection began in the U.S., however. In November 1898, the Inter Ocean, a Chicago newspaper, quoted a gambler recounting a card game against a drug addict. I observed that my lucky faro player gave himself a hypodermic jab in the arm with some fluid he had on tap there, the gambler recalled. I soon discovered he was a confirmed victim of the needle, and required rather regular jabs to keep keyed up to the notch.
This use of jab was likely inspired by the then-new application of the word shot for an injection of a narcotic drug. A January 1889 article in the Sacramento Bee gives an early example: The gang of miserables who have acquired the terrible habit often have a hard time to get money enough to buy a shot as they call a morphine injection. While shot eventually moved into mainstream use for any sort of hypodermic injection, jab remained a slangier alternative.
As the lexicographer Jonathon Green details in Greens Dictionary of Slang, jab began to be used by British forces in World War II to refer to inoculations against diseases like tuberculosis. Gerald Kersh, a writer who served in the British Army, used the word in his 1941 novel They Die With Their Boots Clean: First time that feller got a Jab, he went out like a light.
Source: WSJ
Vinca
(53,994 posts)"Obamacare" was not to be used to describe the ACA because it was a right wing smear. We used it anyway and now it's a good thing. We shouldn't let the crazies define how we speak.
KentuckyWoman
(7,401 posts)If not. I still laughed.
Thanks.
helpisontheway
(5,378 posts)and the people overseas always referred to it as the jab. Did not offend me. 🤷🏽♀️
malaise
(296,114 posts)It's just British speak.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)Which is why this OP is so odd.
malaise
(296,114 posts)first jab. Was really surprised to see the OP.
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)You made a cameo guest star appearance upthread.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)I really thought it was sarcasm at first.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)Mysterian
(6,486 posts)I suggest you find something else to be outgraged about.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)But it has provided immense amusement for many of us.
I truly thought you were just funnin to begin with.
Xoan
(25,570 posts)lighten up
Elessar Zappa
(16,385 posts)Find something real to be outraged about.
beaglelover
(4,466 posts)to seem cool.
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)It's not RW lingo. It's a colloquialism.
Sid
Maeve
(43,457 posts)Sympthsical
(10,969 posts)Retired now.
Regularly refers to things as jabs. Has for decades.
She is quite Democratic.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)US, all Dems, they also call it that. My NP, also a DEm (yes, we talk politics!), also calls it that.
My mother is an old Boomer, and she sometimes calls it a stick as well as a jab.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)XanaDUer2
(15,772 posts)made my day and I feel much better now
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Im with ya!
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Celerity
(54,409 posts)Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Its a classic though!
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)Metatron
(1,260 posts)leftstreet
(40,681 posts)XanaDUer2
(15,772 posts)meds for depression and anxiety, and this thread has amplified their effects
roamer65
(37,953 posts)The Great Depopulation is what we will call October 2021 to May 2022.
Its coming.
Celerity
(54,409 posts)MenloParque
(566 posts)I just remembered there was a slogan at a large Healthcare network in my very progressive county when the vaccine rollout- get your stick. This slogan was on our bus stops, highway signs, billboards. GET YOUR STICK!!
Celerity
(54,409 posts)Student vaccinerade med använd spruta
(Student vaccinated with a used syringe)
https://www.vardfokus.se/yrkesroller/student/student-vaccinerade-med-anvand-spruta/
Texasgal
(17,240 posts)and half my lunch time wasted.
Ocelot II
(130,537 posts)SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Not quite to the level of bombing the moon, but still pretty good.
Sid
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)IcyPeas
(25,475 posts)
liberal_mama
(1,495 posts)they are from England. I didn't realize that it was disrespectful.
NYC Liberal
(20,453 posts)Cousin Dupree
(1,866 posts)Im trying to point out to you that the word jab is commonly and currently used in social media by anti-vaxxers and right-wingers to show disrespect and scorn for the vaccine. Nor did I suggest that everyone who uses it is a right-winger. Considering that, I was trying to point out to some of the kind, even-tempered, welcoming DUers on here might want to know a different perspective. But I see thats not permitted here. Thank you for setting me straight. PS. Im an RN and Ive never used that term and never will.
leftstreet
(40,681 posts)Jim G.
(14,814 posts)The OP said RW'ers use that term as a slur & it bothers them for that reason. I don't believe they said it was used that way universally.
Others have said the same thing. Can you offer an explanation why people would make something like that up? Or is it just impossible that something exists that you don't know about?
kcr
(15,522 posts)Which is why it is getting the nearly universal reaction it's getting from DU.
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)I hate seeing it used on DU.
The "the nearly universal reaction it's getting from DU" is certainly not fact based - more like "I didn't know that so it must be bullshit".
ShazzieB
(22,590 posts)The o.p. didn't say "always," but I think a lot of us felt that was implied (I know I did), and I think that is what got so many people's backs up.
Yes, it's absolutely true that some RWNJs, including the troll you alluded to, like to use the word in a disparaging way. I think it's pretty obvious when they are doing so. But that doesn't mean it's accurate to state that it's "meant to be disrespectful" without adding some sort of qualifier.
I'm not sure even now if the o.p. intended to convey that using the word "jab" in connection with the covid vaccine is ALWAYS "meant to be disrespectful," but by not qualifying the statement in any way, they certainly left the door wide open to that interpretation.
It's simply not accurate to state that a word is "meant to be disrespectful" and just leave it at that when loads of people have been using it in an innocuous way for years and years. If the o.p. had said they didn't like it when antivaxxers use the word "jab" as if it's a slur, we would be reading a comletely different thread right now.
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)Especially when I know for a fact it is being used as a slur by RW'ers. Including today.
It is meant to be disrespectful when it's used by RW'ers, which is how I interpreted the OP.
leftstreet
(40,681 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(106,212 posts)In the vast majority of cases, it's not. Your OP was not qualified in any way. If people believed you, they'd then start making false assumptions about all kinds of people who just use it with no political implication at all (what a state the US is in, when a vaccine is political!). That would cause rancour. So it's better that people have made it clear how mistaken you were.
muriel_volestrangler
(106,212 posts)On a British forum, one poster said "why is everyone calling it a 'jag'"? Those of us from England couldn't work out what they were on about, while those from Scotland turned it into a literal No True Scotsman argument - they claimed that anyone from Scotland, as that poster said they were, would be familiar with the term.
Because it turns out 'jag' is a term used for an injection in Scotland - it can mean a thorn, or a prick (such as from a thorn), and thus an injection.
A fringe but well-followed Scottish nationalist account called MSM Monitor was enraged. They have been conditioned to accept it without thought, he or she declared.
A product of colonial culture.
Well, that is hot nonsense. Because jab and jag are both Scots words. True, youre perhaps more likely to say jag in Glasgow, or jab in Aberdeen.
https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/19090594.david-leask-getting-needle-whether-jag-jab/
https://www.dsl.ac.uk/entry/snd/jag_n1_v1
Baltimike
(4,441 posts)Sapient Donkey
(1,568 posts)Its like giving them the Betsy Ross flag. No way!
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Jim G.
(14,814 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)Did you see my post #238 of the Marsh Family singing about it?
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)That seems to be the popular belief in this thread.
And no I didn't bother to look at the video you posted. It wouldn't have altered my opinion on the matter in any case. As I stated upthread, I saw a troll post that very term as a slur here this morning before they were banned.
So yeah, it's a thing.
ShazzieB
(22,590 posts)It's also at least just much of a thing to use "jab" in a completely innocuous way, and I see nothing wrong with continuing to do so.
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)The OP is a nurse familiar with the "slur" usage, as was another nurse upthread. As well as you, me & several others in this thread that have seen trolls use it here to be derogatory.
If you don't see anything wrong with it that's fine. If you take exception to the way the OP was worded, that's fine too. But all these people attacking the OP because "they say that in England" kinda misses the point.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)They are an amazingly musical British family with young kids that have amused themselves and delighted thousands with their offbeat performances during these dark days. Have the New Jab is sung to the tune of Cohens Hallelujah. Enjoy and look up the rest of their oeuvre on You Tube.
Lucid Dreamer
(589 posts)I have absolutely no interest in this, but since it looks like I'm the only on DU that hasn't posted here I hate to be impolite.
How are you all doing?
G'nite.
Decoy of Fenris
(1,954 posts)TheProle
(3,982 posts)this is where the action is!
canetoad
(20,769 posts)Jab: British informal a hypodermic injection, especially a vaccination.
Here is Australia they are called shots or jabs - equally. Wherever did this RW lingo idea come from?
muriel_volestrangler
(106,212 posts)You laugh at a question that you ought to have answered a long time ago. But instead, you've just harped on about the one DU repeat troll who you're convinced uses it to be demeaning (rather than, say, having a non-US English background). So where does this RW usage come from, in your opinion?
Music Man
(1,664 posts)But I do find cutesy nicknames for vaccinations rather annoying.
The jab, getting stuck, the Fauci Ouchie, and so on.
GusBob
(8,249 posts)Has always made me feel uncomfortable
Its about incest or inbreeding aint it?
I dont like seeing those words on DU
ProfessorGAC
(76,706 posts)...Top 10 Most Unnecessary Threads in DU history.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Unfortunately it was a molehill.
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)She and her co-workers have been using that term for decades. It has absolutely no political connotations whatsoever.
Jim G.
(14,814 posts)And RW'ers use that term as a slur for the Covid vaccine. A troll you're familiar with was banned for it this morning.
It's a thing.

