5/26/1994 US President Bill Clinton signed the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act in to law

[Budi]

THANK YOU PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON.
THANK YOU HILLARY CLINTON.

HERE IT IS:

Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (1994)
By: Claudia Nunez-Eddy
Published: 2017-05-25

On 26 May 1994, US President Bill Clinton signed the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act in to law, which federally criminalized acts of obstruction and violence towards reproductive health clinics. The law was a reaction to the increasing violence toward abortion clinics, providers, and patients during the 1990s.

That violence included clinic blockades and protests, assaults on physicians and patients, and murders.

The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act established criminal and civil penalties against people who obstructed or committed violence towards reproductive health clinics, and has supported women's access to safe reproductive healthcare.

In 1973, the US Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., federally legalized abortion in Roe v. Wade. The US Supreme Court ruled that women had constitutional rights to privacy in reproductive health decisions such as those about abortion. After its legalization, opponents of abortion restricted women's access to abortion services.
Some anti-abortion groups began physically blocking entrances to reproductive healthcare centers that provided abortions.
Those groups attempted to disrupt the provision of all medical services at women's clinics by having protestors sit or lie in front of the clinic doors or park cars in driveways so no one could enter or exit the clinics.

Throughout the 1980s, protests and blockages at reproductive health clinics became increasingly violent. From 1977 to 1993, women's health clinics in the US and Canada reported over 6,100 clinic blockades and over 1,000 violent acts against physicians or patients of reproductive health clinics. Clinic staff and clients reported threats of physical violence, vandalism, and trespassing on clinic property.
Some acts of violence included arson and chemical attacks on clinic property and staff. Although the violent protests targeted abortion providers and patients, they often harmed bystanders.
Additionally, even non-violent blockades of clinic entrances harmed patients by preventing access to general reproductive healthcare.

Violence continued throughout the early 1990s with the murders of several physicians and clinic workers. On 10 March 1993, physician David Gunn was shot and killed outside his office at the Women's Medical Services clinic in Pensacola, Florida. Later in August, physician George Tiller was shot and wounded at his abortion clinic in Wichita, Kansas. Tiller was later murdered by anti-abortion activists while at church in 2009.
The following summer on 29 July 1994, physician John Britton, his wife, and his bodyguard, were shot while sitting in their car outside the Ladies Center in Pensacola. Britton and his bodyguard died of their injuries. The same year in December, attacks on two clinics in Boston, Massachusetts, wounded five staff workers and killed two.

Citing a nationwide trend of increasingly violent attacks on reproductive health clinics, US Congress in Washington, D.C., proposed legislation. Members of US Congress argued that the movement to restrict women's access to abortion and reproductive healthcare was nationwide and restricted civil rights protected by the US Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade.
Members of US Congress further argued that federal legislation was needed to protect those rights. Legislators aimed to protect the safety and promote the public health of those providing or accessing reproductive health services.

On 10 April 1991, Representative Meldon Levine, Democrat of California, introduced House Bill 1703, called Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances of 1991, to the US House of Representatives. The bill proposed an amendment to Chapter 13 of Title 18 of the US Code. Title 18 is the section of the US Code that deals with federal crimes and procedures. More specifically, Chapter 13 details crimes against civil rights. The proposed amendment to Chapter 13 would make any violent or obstructive protests at reproductive health clinics a federal felony. The bill sought to stop the use of violence, threats of violence, physical obstruction, intimidation, or clinic damage to prevent reproductive health clinic staff and patients from being harassed.

On 11 April 1991, Republican Senator Alan Cranston from Wyoming introduced Senate Bill 798 to the US Senate. That bill was identical to House Bill 1703, and sought to prohibit violent and obstructive acts against reproductive health clinics. However, the US Senate and US House did not vote on either bill before the Congressional term was over. Therefore, the bills would need to be reintroduced at a later Congress for Congress to vote on them.

On 3 February 1993, Representative Charles Schumer, Democrat of New York, introduced House Bill 796, also called the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1993, to the US House of Representatives. Later, on 23 March 1993, US Senator Edward Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, introduced Senate Bill 636, or the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994, to the US Senate. After several modifications to the Senate bill, the US House of Representatives decided to substitute the senate bill for their house bill. A conference committee of members from both the House of Representatives and the Senate met to make modifications and produce the final draft of the bill.

In May 1994, both the US House of Representatives and the US Senate voted to pass the conference committee's final version of the bill, called the Freedom of Clinic Entrances Act. On 26 May 1994, US President Bill Clinton signed the Freedom of Clinic Entrances Act into law.

The final law added amendment 248 to section 13 of Title 18 of the US Criminal Code. The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act prohibited the use of force, threat of force, physical obstruction, intentional cause or attempted cause of injury, intimidation, or property damage from obtaining or providing reproductive health services. In addition, the act applied to places of worship, such as churches.
That section of the law protected those lawfully exercising rights of religious freedom permitted by the First Amendment to the US Constitution at a place of worship, by making violence or obstruction at places of worship illegal.

The law stipulated the penalties for such actions as fines of no more than $10,000 and six months imprisonment for non-violent first offenses.
However, if violent crimes resulted in bodily injury or death, the penalties could be much higher. In addition to federal prosecution, in which the federal government could prosecute individuals for violating the act, the act allowed for civil prosecution as well.
The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act specified that those harmed by violators of the law could seek legal action for related damages.
In addition, the law specified that the US attorney general could civilly sue on behalf of any person or group injured by an individual who violated the law.
The law notes that it does not seek to prohibit First Amendment freedom of speech such as peaceful demonstrating, or to interfere with states' ability to regulate abortions.

After the passing of the Freedom of Clinic Entrances Act, many anti-abortion groups protested the law. Such groups claimed that the law violated their rights to freedom of speech found in the First Amendment, and argued that the law unfairly targeted them based on their religious beliefs that opposed abortion.
Anti-abortion activists immediately brought lawsuits against the government challenging the law's constitutionality. However, courts throughout the country upheld the constitutionality of the Freedom of Clinic Entrances Act.

Courts stated that the law did not discriminate against the anti-abortion viewpoint because it protected all reproductive health clinics, those that provide abortion services and those that did not.
Additionally, courts stated that the law was consistent with the First Amendment because the law was aimed at acts of violence, which were not a form of protected speech.

The Freedom of Clinic Entrances Act discouraged large-scale clinic obstruction and harassment. Nevertheless, violence towards abortion clinics and providers continued into the twenty-first century.

In 1998, anti-abortion activists killed physician Barnett Slepian in Buffalo, New York. Large-scale clinic bombings and shootings have occurred, such as the 1997 bombing of an Atlanta, Georgia, abortion clinic and the 2015 shooting at a Planned Parenthood clinic in Colorado Springs, Colorado. However, the Freedom of Clinic Entrances Act grants the federal government the authority and power to investigate and punish those acts of violence towards reproductive healthcare providers.


History of Roe v Wade / Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act / FACE (1994)
Citations/sponsors/Vote:

https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/freedom-access-clinic-entrances-act-1994

*****

To read the history of how many years, how dangerous the fight, and the amount of committment & months, days, hours & years, & both good & united Men & Women it took to protect the rights of women, It Is Appalling To See How Carelessly & Often Intentionally It Was All Dismissed In 2016.

It Makes Me Sick To Hear Anyone Now Excusing Those Who Had A Part In Bringing About The Supreme Court We Have Today.


Look what it took to not only get to Roe v Wade, but years later having the need to Make Protections Law.

[11 Bravo]

1. Bill O'Reilly should have been charged as an accessory in the death of George Tiller.

His repeated references to Dr. Tiller as a "murderer" and as "Tiller the baby-killer" were clear incitements to violence.

[Budi]

2. Yes indeed. Note that call to violence is repeated today by the same voices as then.

Like O'Reilly back then, those Today who failed to protect all the necessary Laws brought about by Roe v Wade, in one callous drumbeat to demoralize & defeat the ONE Candidate who truly had a life commitment to securing the Rights of Women, all fall in the same category.

They flat out just Omitted the subject Women's Basic Rights, while waving off the intense urgency of the warnings of 2016 Presidential Candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton.
And going so far as to share & repeat across the political & media spectrum, the destructive memes & slogans laid out for her demise.

Her demise via political sabatoge in 2016, is now the same destructive demise of women & girls & those who support them.

And now they again raise funds & promote their names & political posing for "likes & press", in demanding President Biden, Sen Schumer, Speaker Pelosi & THE DEMOCRATS TO "DO SOMETHING".

Yes, even decrying Sen Schumer, who along with Sen Ted Kennedy brought the FACE ACT of 1994 to be passed in the House & Senate, & signed into Law by President Bill Clinton.


After 2016, they all need to just shut up & sit down. They got what they set out to accomplish on Nov 2016.
They can now wear that like a big old badge of personal success, while the Democrats frantically rush find a big enough bandage for the gaping wound to Women & Human Rights, that the loud drumbeat of 2016 revolutions carelessly ripped open.

Women & Roe lost.

[LetMyPeopleVote]

3. We will not tolerate violence against those seeking to obtain or provide reproductive health service

Link to tweet

[Budi]

5. K & R

AG has his hands full cleaning up the sabatoge of our Justice system.
Bill Barr knew how to muck it up before he exited his office.

[crickets]

4. K&R for visibility.