Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

womanofthehills

(8,703 posts)
Fri Sep 24, 2021, 01:09 PM Sep 2021

Rochelle Walensky overrules her agencies advisory committee & recommends boosters

C.D.C. Chief Overrules Agency Panel and Recommends Pfizer-BioNTech Boosters for Workers at Risk

In a highly unusual decision, the C.D.C. director, Rochelle Walensky, reversed a move by agency advisers and endorsed additional doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for health care workers, teachers and other workers at risk.
The C.D.C.’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices on Thursday recommended the boosters for a wide range of Americans, including tens of millions of older adults and younger people at high risk for the disease. But they excluded health care workers, teachers and others whose jobs put them at risk. That put their recommendations at odds with the F.D.A.’s authorization of booster shots for all adults with a high occupational risk.

Dr. Walensky’s decision was a boost for President Biden’s campaign to give a broad segment of Americans access to boosters. The White House had come under criticism for getting ahead of the regulatory process.

The White House could begin promoting and rolling out a plan for booster shots as soon as Friday. That would be in keeping with the administration’s previously announced plan to offer the additional doses this week. - from today’s NYT ( I can’t get link to work)
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rochelle Walensky overrules her agencies advisory committee & recommends boosters (Original Post) womanofthehills Sep 2021 OP
Excellent! 👏👏👏👏 SheltieLover Sep 2021 #1
Not so sure. One of the reasons it was not advised because there are no studies womanofthehills Sep 2021 #4
Nice CentralMass Sep 2021 #2
Good blogslug Sep 2021 #3

womanofthehills

(8,703 posts)
4. Not so sure. One of the reasons it was not advised because there are no studies
Fri Sep 24, 2021, 01:36 PM
Sep 2021

The CDC advisory committee wanted more data before making a decision like this.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rochelle Walensky overrul...