General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums“Voting is a privilege, not a right,” said one GOP official
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2011/dec/14/state-gops-worst-enemy-republicans/Jon Ralston:
State GOPs worst enemy: Republicans
By Jon Ralston (contact)
Wednesday, Dec. 14, 2011 | 2 a.m.
Political parties, generally, are made up of two sorts of regulars: The half-crazy and the full-on nuts.
Anyone who has been to a central committee meeting knows this is indisputable. If you havent, rent One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest and youll get the idea. snip
Voting is a privilege, not a right, one GOP official, Woody Stroupe, declared, apparently thinking the confab had been called on gaming licenses and not the most sacred right in a democracy. Stroupe, according to a Review-Journal report, also announced, We might as well invite the Chinese over here. You cant vote in your country, but you can vote in our state.
Millers aides seemed puzzled, as would any sentient human being. And then it got worse.
barbtries
(31,308 posts)asshole. voting IS a right.
midnight
(26,624 posts)I grew up in a community of ranchers, and many drove a horse without considering it a privilege but instead a method to move around freely. I wonder how many more years it will take ALEC to get us to think voting is a privilege of only those with a certain amount of money, status, or property.... They are closing in on it...
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)you should be mandated to take, at least, remedial civics courses.
EC
(12,287 posts)to make sure they at least know more than immigrants.
barbtries
(31,308 posts)and came back to kick again. i think it may be written by a republican, or anyway a person who holds no love for the democrats, but...well, it's so illustrative of the fact that the republicans have gone off the rails.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)the Constitution. Voting is a RIGHT, dickweed.
Bandit
(21,475 posts)When the Constitution was written, Senators and Congressmen were chosen by state Governors and State Legislators. I don't believe there is a single Federal election on anything..
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
JitterbugPerfume
(18,183 posts)+
Response to hifiguy (Reply #5)
Obamanaut This message was self-deleted by its author.
zipplewrath
(16,698 posts)The "right to vote" doesn't equate to "a right for there to be an election". Once there is an election, there is a right to vote and each state is allowed to defined who, within the restrictions of the (amended) Constitution, which (now) ensures equal protection.
Response to zipplewrath (Reply #12)
Obamanaut This message was self-deleted by its author.
ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)<snip>
It does require that Representatives be chosen and Senators be elected by "the People,"
</snip>
This is totally backward...
sP
NYC Liberal
(20,453 posts)for states that violate it:
"But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State."
Granted, it doesn't include women.
But if only this was actually enforced. There's no "Congress may reduce." It says "the basis of representation SHALL be reduced."
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)OffWithTheirHeads
(10,337 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)then he is in violation of that oath and should be censured (at the very least).
jwirr
(39,215 posts)that about almost all social issues. They are entitled but we are not.
surfdog
(624 posts)I might agree with him.
I look at it as a privilege that can be taken away , kind of like the "right to own a gun" .. it is a privilege that can be taken away.
I could bomb a dozen churches on Sunday morning and shoot at the police when they show up at my house , ..and STILL have Habeas Corpus rights. HC is a right , and it can't be taken away.
Americans can vote and own guns as long as they behave. I guess in my mind , a right can't be taken away , I have a right to it.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)It may sound half-crazy or even full-on nuts, but the only thing that can save Nevada Democrats next year might be the Nevada Republican Party.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)They are of the belief that only white male property-owners should vote.