General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI lost a family member to gun violence this weekend
Still numb from hearing the news. He didnt even live to see 30. What happened to fist fighting? Apparently he was killed by his new girlfriends either ex/other boyfriend. Not sure of the details on that yet. So senseless.
His mother is devastated, of course. He died in NY. She lives in FL. Getting on a flight to claim your childs body should not be something any parent has to go through. Parents are not supposed to bury their children.
When will our government do something??? I dont know it for a fact but I am willing to bet this was not a legal firearm. This happened in NYC.
Apparently ghost guns are contributing to the huge uptick in violent crimes. You can just order parts online and make a DIY gun at home. What is wrong with this country?
vercetti2021
(10,156 posts)What the fuck
maxsolomon
(33,400 posts)It has resulted in the most heavily armed populace in history. More guns, more shootings.
marybourg
(12,634 posts)The Supreme Courts interpretation of it is.
Jerry2144
(2,111 posts)The poor writing of 2nd amendment is the problem, in addition to an activist SCOTUS. A well-regulated militia means a well-practiced and trained militia sanctioned by the state. Being necessary to the security of a free state means that a militia is necessary to protect from slave rebellions, from native American uprisings, and from attack from outsiders. This was needed before we created a standing military and should have been tossed out when slavery was abolished.
You want to keep a muzzle-loader, a revolver, or a pump/lever/bolts action weapon - then OK, that is within the bounds of the intent of the 2nd amendment. But you want to keep a weapon of war, a weapon that can pump out more than one round per minute, or is not practical for hunting, protecting against wild-life (wolves, bears, etc.) then you better be trained, have your weapon registered, and be subject to a thorough background check. Otherwise no mega-death for you.
Most of these "pro-second amendment" men with their high-caliber, PP X-10-DRs or PNS N-large-rs (sound them out) and multi-round clips would not last 5 seconds against the BSA, let alone our modern, militarized police or any true military force. They just choose to ignore the more important clause of the amendment and the history behind it. This is yet another grain of sand on the beach of reasons to teach a true, unvarnished, unbiased history of this nation.
former9thward
(32,077 posts)Very, very few happen with what you are calling "high caliber" weapons. Your version of the intent of the 2nd amendment is very strange. If we follow your logic then the 1st amendment goes out the window also. The founders never wrote the 1st with the "intention" of the internet or any other modern methods of communication. So I guess we go back to quills and ink pots.
wnylib
(21,606 posts)objecting to is accurate. Throughout colonial times, during the Revolution, and for decades afterward, communities protected themselves from raids by Native tribes and from Native alliances with other nations (France, especially) by forming local militias. They also protected themselves from wild animals with their home-owned guns.
Since every family had at least one gun, people who joined militias were expected to provide their own weapons when they gathered for training. During genealogical tracing of my colonial ancestors, I found that several of them had been soldiers and officers in colonial and Revolutionary militias.
That is what the phrase in the 2nd amendment refers to when it says, "A well-regulated militia being necessary ..." It was necessary for households to maintain firearms and ammunition in order to join militias and be ready when called to action.
With the modern National Guard, that is no longer necessary. But, people who want to hunt or protect themselves from animals, particularly people in rural areas, should be allowed to own guns. But for the safety of society, gun ownership needs to be regulated.
uponit7771
(90,363 posts)maxsolomon
(33,400 posts)Heller v DC.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/05/john-paul-stevens-court-failed-gun-control/587272/
Firearms were profligate prior to that decision, but now it is off the charts.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,121 posts)liberalmuse
(18,672 posts)I'm sorry you and your loved ones have to deal with this horrible tragedy. All so a bunch of people can fetishize and play with guns. All these guns floating around make it too easy to just shoot someone rather than have any kind of discussion to try and resolve any differences.
okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)iemanja
(53,066 posts)I'm so sorry.
Danmel
(4,924 posts)Walleye
(31,045 posts)Is it just ordinary cowardice?I have often asked that. You end up with a good work out and years later you can look back on it and laugh. A gun fight seems very unsatisfying way too permanent. I am so sorry you had to experience this in your family
Demobrat
(8,989 posts)I grew up in a somewhat rough part of Chicago where fighting was an inescapable part of growing up, even for a bookish little girl like me.
The worst that happened was somebody got a bloody nose.
This - what happened to this young man
Its just so wrong. The person who did it should never be allowed to be part of society again.
But we know how that goes.
Its just so awful. So sorry.
MustLoveBeagles
(11,634 posts)SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Phoenix61
(17,019 posts)niyad
(113,552 posts)brer cat
(24,605 posts)Such a senseless tragedy must be horrific for the family to comprehend and accept.
SYFROYH
(34,183 posts)Ilsa
(61,698 posts)cate94
(2,813 posts)StevieM
(10,500 posts)spanone
(135,873 posts)I'm still sickened to know that not a thing changed
so sorry....
wnylib
(21,606 posts)was soul crushingly sad. When it became obvious that even the deaths of elementary children did not move people enough to address the gun problem, I was depressed.
wnylib
(21,606 posts)and your family for this senseless death.
tulipsandroses
(5,127 posts)It is much appreciated.