General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPSA: Frances Haugen will be testifying Tuesday October 5 before the
Senate sub committee on commerce.
Rhiannon12866
(205,272 posts)https://www.democraticunderground.com/1017685122
Frances Haugen says in her time with Facebook she saw, "conflicts of interest between what was good for the public and what was good for Facebook." Scott Pelley reports. Aired on 10/03/2021.
mobeau69
(11,143 posts)Rhiannon12866
(205,272 posts)She was quite impressive, courageous enough to report what she found and intelligent enough to know the right way to go about it. This is a very important story.
Klaralven
(7,510 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,146 posts)Link to tweet
Psychological experimentation without informed consent is or is not a crime?
Laws must either be enforced or written. Do our lawmakers and enforcers have the strength to protect us?
jaxexpat
(6,820 posts)that it is our responsibility, as individuals, to discern truth from fiction. For if we cannot legislate ourselves we are ungovernable, even though we may be able to follow rules.
Recall well how my grandfather always despised advertisements, "if I want something and can afford it, I'll buy it and I don't need some smartassed advertiser to tell me when, why or how." He also hated that gasoline and other prices ended with .99 instead of an honest whole number.
lonely bird
(1,685 posts)I dont think that Zuckerberg was smart enough to look ahead at what could happen with Facebook. Then I dont think he was smart enough to know what to do when the shit started hitting the fan. This doesnt excuse him or the people had around him. It just points out that successful people are not necessarily capable of dealing with the unintended consequences of their success.