Good for Twitter: "Twitter CFO says Trump's ban is permanent, even if he runs for office"
Twitter CFO says Trump's ban is permanent, even if he runs for office again
Link to tweet
https://abc7news.com/politics/twitter-to-uphold-permanent-ban-against-trump/10327473/
= new reply since forum marked as read
and given your inexplicable need to repeatedly attack me for a post (and a tweet from someone else) that you don't like, I could not be more pleased that you choose (FINALLY) to ignore my posts- a gift almost as good as Twitter's permanent ban for TFG.
ridiculous litigation).
What part of those two statements do you believe has changed? There has been no update to rules on Twitter as far as I know. 
The tweet that I posted was from October 2 (two days ago) in response to all the concern about Trump's announced plan (also 2 days ago) to try to get the courts to force Twitter's hand (ridiculous, of course). In addition, that tweet was in response to those who thought Twitter would fold under the threat. Thus the reiteration of the two previous statements from Twitter's CFO-- which were quite unambiguous. It was not MY tweet, but it IS still relevant for the reasons I laid out. You can disagree, of course.
Two statements making clear that "permanent IS permanent" seem pretty decisive to me. I'm not sure they are obligated to go beyond a clearly delineated policy. That it was one that many here had apparently not heard about previously, either in February or May, only underscores that the tweet was useful in referencing it in a discussion about TFG"s farcical lawsuit.
The less I know of your dealings, the better my day is.
That is one of the true hallmarks of being a complete psychopath. 
Fuck face thought he was soooo Clever Lying his Bloated head OFF
The news media would routinely broadcast TFG's noxious, name-calling, imbecilic tweets. The experience was debasing to an entire country. How could such a numb-skulled idiot be the leader of the free world? Folks who had differences with TFG, or not, would hold their breath waiting to be the target of his Twitter poison, then brace themselves as they received streams of vomitus, and worse, from Trumpers.
Glory, glory, glory to Twitter! 
P.S. -- The other disturbing aspect of TFG's tweets: the time stamps would often indicate that he'd be up in the dead of night tweeting his middle school rants.
Two statements making clear that "permanent IS permanent" seem pretty decisive to me. I'm not sure they are obligated to go beyond a clearly delineated policy, but if you have seen anything whatsoever to suggest they are moving from their February and May statements (below) do let me know and I will update the OP. That this twice-stated policy was one that many here had apparently not heard about previously, either in February or May, only underscores that the tweet (not my own) was useful in referencing it in a discussion about TFG"s farcical lawsuit.
“The way our policies work, when you’re removed from the platform, you’re removed from the platform, whether you’re a commentator, you’re a CFO, or you are a former or current public official,” said Segal.
Trump was accused of using Twitter to communicate with insurrectionists during the January 6 attack on the nation’s capitol during the confirmation of the electoral college votes, which would formally name Joe Biden as the next president.
“Remember, our policies are designed to make sure that people are not inciting violence,” Segal added. “If anybody does that, we have to remove them from the service and our policies don’t allow people to come back.”
https://thesource.com/2021/10/04/donald-trump-is-seeking-reinstatement-on-twitter-in-legal-action/
And again, May, 2021:
Twitter CFO: No changes to our thinking on Trump's account
https://news.yahoo.com/twitter-cfo-no-changes-to-our-thinking-on-trumps-account-171855099.html
I don't follow...