Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(111,963 posts)
Sat Oct 9, 2021, 07:35 AM Oct 2021

Democrats split on mining royalties

U.S. senators of both parties at a hearing Tuesday rejected House Democrats’ plans to impose billions of dollars in royalties and other fees on companies that mine for gold, copper, lithium and other minerals, largely in Southwestern states.

Among the opponents was Nevada Democrat Catherine Cortez Masto, who said she objected to the House proposal because of its “unfair, outsized impact” on her gold-producing state and because it is included in a sweeping, $3.5 trillion package that would move through the budget reconciliation process. Under that procedure, Democrats would need just a simple majority for passage in the Senate.

The mining royalty issue is likely to re-emerge when senators mark up their version of the $3.5 trillion bill, which is also likely to be scaled back considerably after disagreements between moderate and progressive Democrats over its price tag.

An 1872 federal law set the standard for hard-rock mining, allowing companies to skip paying royalties on minerals taken from public lands. Environmentalists, fiscal hawks and some congressional Democrats have for decades sought to add a royalty rate for miners of hard-rock minerals.

Read more: https://minnesotareformer.com/2021/10/06/democrats-split-on-mining-royalties/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats split on mining royalties (Original Post) TexasTowelie Oct 2021 OP
Odd how they never discover oil, gas, or minerals in the inner city bucolic_frolic Oct 2021 #1
There are lots of oil wells in Los Angeles Klaralven Oct 2021 #2

bucolic_frolic

(43,062 posts)
1. Odd how they never discover oil, gas, or minerals in the inner city
Sat Oct 9, 2021, 08:07 AM
Oct 2021

Now we know why they never look: royalty payments.

 

Klaralven

(7,510 posts)
2. There are lots of oil wells in Los Angeles
Sat Oct 9, 2021, 08:36 AM
Oct 2021
The Urban Oil Fields of Los Angeles

In the 1890s, the small town of Los Angeles (population 50,000) began a transformation driven by the discovery and drilling of some of the most productive oil fields in history. By 1930, California was producing nearly one quarter of the world's oil output, and its population had grown to 1.2 million. In the decades that followed, many wells closed, but even more opened, surrounded by urban and suburban growth. Machinery was camouflaged, loud noises were abated, methane pockets were vented, as residents learned to live side-by-side with oil production facilities. To this day, oil fields in the Los Angeles Basin remain very productive, and modern techniques have centralized operations into smaller areas or moved offshore. Gathered here are images of some of the sites and machinery still in use among the homes, golf courses, and shopping malls of Los Angeles.


https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2014/08/the-urban-oil-fields-of-los-angeles/100799/

That Southern California car culture didn't just happen. There were reasons.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrats split on mining...