General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums10-Year-Old With COVID Dies After Mom Given Choice to Amputate Limbs or 'Let Him Go'
Zyrin Foots, a 10-year-old boy from Texas, developed Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C) after contracting COVID-19. A rare condition, MIS-C causes inflammation in children's organs, including the heart, and the inability of Foots' heart to pump blood caused him to develop gangrene in his legs.
Gangrene causes body tissue to die and can be fatal if left untreated, and the treatment can result in the loss of a body part. Ashley Engmann, Foots' aunt, told KTRK-TV that doctors gave her sister, Foots' mother, a choice. She could amputate his arms and legs, which would give him a 25 percent chance of survival. Without the amputation, Engmann said the 10-year-old didn't have "any chance to live."
Foots' mom made the difficult decision to "let him go," according to Engmann, because she saw it as the most "humane and compassionate thing she can do for her child."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/10-year-old-with-covid-dies-after-mom-given-choice-to-amputate-limbs-or-let-him-go/ar-AAPzfrK
This is absolutely horrifying. I can't imagine what that mom must be going through right now.
AllyCat
(16,251 posts)Cannot imagine being in her position, but completely support her decision.
Heartbreaking. All because the MAGAts cannot conceive of protecting the public and actually BEING "pro-life".
joetheman
(1,450 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)LisaL
(44,980 posts)NT
frogmarch
(12,160 posts)Because it was a matter of life and death, couldn't the doctors have just gone ahead with the amputation?
ecstatic
(32,773 posts)I don't think she should have been asked to make that decision.
Wingus Dingus
(8,059 posts)I would have gone ahead with the surgeries, but that's a horrible choice she had to make, I hope she can find peace with it.
LiberatedUSA
(1,666 posts)Do they normally give choices in life or death situations or do they normally just act to save and go from there? Like would they ask the family of a car crash victim in the ER, ok, we could save them, but theyll be paralyzed. Pull the plug?
whopis01
(3,529 posts)In this case, the mother is the guardian and is responsible for making those decisions for her child.
In the example you gave, if the family member had medical power of attorney, then they could refuse the procedure on behalf of the injured relative. Typically spouses automatically have medical power of attorney, but other family members would not in the case of an adult.
This doesn't mean that the doctors have to seek out a family member in order to get consent. But if a guardian, or other person with medical power of attorney is objecting to the procedure, then they can't proceed with it. So in the case of a sudden, traumatic injury, there is much less chance of someone else being present to object to the procedure than is the case with a disease that is progressing over a longer period of time.
Crunchy Frog
(26,698 posts)I think the guardian should be allowed to make that choice if the child isn't able to express an opinion.
I honestly don't know what I would do.
LiberatedUSA
(1,666 posts)mucifer
(23,596 posts)poor prognosis I am glad no one tried that.
marybourg
(12,645 posts)that an adult would have been given for himself. Nobody would amputate all four of a persons limbs without asking the person if thats what they want. Here, the parent stood in for the child to make the decision
malaise
(269,250 posts)I would have done the same
sinkingfeeling
(51,487 posts)Fla Dem
(23,836 posts)But for that poor 10 year boy to lose all his limbs and probably be very health compromised IF he survived, would have been cruel to him.
malaise
(269,250 posts)Last edited Fri Oct 15, 2021, 02:38 PM - Edit history (3)
Still that must have been a very painful decision
ShazzieB
(16,594 posts)I would have made the same choice, and my heart goes out to that mom.
25% chance of survival? Yeesh.
Mariana
(14,861 posts)The story doesn't address the issue of brain damage, but I suspect it's likely.
stopdiggin
(11,404 posts)suspect that there are other potential long term consequences involved here. So - a 25% shot at - a pretty crappy outcome.
obamanut2012
(26,179 posts)As hard as it is, sometimes the loving thing is to say goodbye and let go. The parents did the best and most loving thing they could for their little boy.
Tragic.
marybourg
(12,645 posts)wryter2000
(46,123 posts)Amputate his limbs and watch him die of something else? No thanks.
calimary
(81,560 posts)What kind of life could a previously normal and active ten-year-old expect to have with multiple amputations? One amputation? Perhaps of a leg? Id imagine the mom would have sadly and reluctantly approved. I know from 40+ years of personal experience (not me but someone near and dear) that a leg amputation, at least BK (below the knee) need not hold anybody back.
But more than that? A second limb? Thats awfully hard. Although people do recover and carry on. Max Cleland lost both legs and an arm in Vietnam. He went on not only to recover but thrive, even campaigning for, and winning, a seat in the United States Senate. He became an inspiration and a role model for pretty much everybody, about pretty much everything. Lost re-election to an able-bodied waste of turd manufacture (Saxby Chambliss) who had no business even being in the Capitol building, much les in Senate chambers. On two legs.
But ALL FOUR? Max Cleland was at least old enough to have served in the military. Hed enjoyed a normal non-handicapped life into adulthood before calamity struck.
But THIS kid? Could he have made an adjustment this big? Had he been into sports? Was he physically active?
What a nightmare for that mother. And how does SHE adjust to this? A decision SHE had to make. Every mother expects her kids to outlive her. A little bit of her, deep inside, will likely always be at war with herself over this, for the rest of her life. And there will be people who cant - or worse - wont understand. I feel so bad for her. It hurts me just to think about her and where she is in a moment like this. Her sons suffering is over. Hers has just begun.
malaise
(269,250 posts)Last edited Fri Oct 15, 2021, 06:20 PM - Edit history (1)
It's the reality that even after those amputations, the poor child has a 25% chance of survival. This is a perfect example of 'do unto others what you'd have them do unto you'.
calimary
(81,560 posts)And I hadnt even added that in, but it absolutely IS a factor.
What kind of life would that little boy have?
And to that question, one is forced to add
and for how long?
Just AWFUL! OMG that poor mother. At least a little bit of her will be struggling with this for the rest of her life.
exboyfil
(17,865 posts)If they had gold plated insurance, then the doctors might have pushed more?
Just speculating.
A 10 year old child with a 1 in 4 chance seems like something that would make more sense for surgery than a lot of the end of life stuff on Medicare that will extend another few weeks or months to a 80+ year old.
ecstatic
(32,773 posts)How did the doctors allow the heart failure to go untreated to the point where his limbs developed gangrene?! The medical community was made aware of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children at least 18 months ago.
Fla Dem
(23,836 posts)I would not want any child not to get the best care possible.
LisaL
(44,980 posts)You are making assumptions without evidence.
ShazzieB
(16,594 posts)we could stand to tamp down on the 'outrage factor.'
KT2000
(20,601 posts)who had his leg(s) amputated. He was on a ventilator but that was not enough to get oxygen to his legs. He died anyway but after month of suffering.
I think this is part of the illness - inflammatory syndrome and clots beyond the scope of blood thinners.
LisaL
(44,980 posts)Nick Cordero was his name.
wnylib
(21,728 posts)It is very rare. It can develop very quickly. It can be stopped in some cases IF it is recognized very early, but early symptoms are mild and don't seem threatening. Once it progresses, it is not reversible, as far as I know, unless new treatments have been developed since I first learned about it.
This affects mainly children. Only a few have survived. Nobody knows yet why some children who get covid also develop this syndrome.
Even with good covid treatment, a child can develop MSIS as a result of covid.
catrose
(5,076 posts)wnylib
(21,728 posts)so many more children are getting infected now than when the pandemic started. I first heard of it early in the pandemic when NYC and the rest of NY were getting hit so hard.
jimfields33
(16,067 posts)Screw that. Poor mom did make the right choice.
flying_wahini
(6,684 posts)LisaL
(44,980 posts)NT
You think doctors should be able to amputate child's limbs (all of them) without parental permission?
plimsoll
(1,671 posts)I'm not sure they have too, but they ask before amputation. Some people opt not to as you can tell. But this was last ditch probably, I think the unstated truth was that the amputations probably wouldn't have made any difference. In addition to the Covid related organ problems gangrene often leads to patients going septic. So %25 of making it through the night?
I feel for the mother. With adults you probably know the other persons wishes. This is ending theirs and yours at the same time.
And this, a child who could not get the vaccine is why adults should get it. Not be forced to through mandates, but because people who don't have options can get sick and die. I see I said adults, my bad, people eligible for the vaccine. I suspect all the adults did so.
Botany
(70,633 posts)Fla Dem
(23,836 posts)Botany
(70,633 posts)... masked up there is a very good chance that young man would not have gotten the disease. The delta
variant wave is the result of idiots who thought that they knew more science and medicine then the likes
of Dr. Fauci so they became hosts and incubators for the new strain (delta) of the virus.
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)Botany
(70,633 posts).... 5-11 years olds in a few weeks more people will make sure their kids get it.
GoCubsGo
(32,099 posts)Jerry2144
(2,126 posts)At Fux "News", The repugnant Republicans, and their ilk and the whole MAGAt crowd. This child did not have to die. If those FiretrUCKING Asswipes would just realize how bad their selfishness is and how much harm it causes to others, then maybe this child could have avoided getting exposed. THe rest of his community could have been protected by vaccines and maybe he would never have seen the virus.
I wish the mother could successfully sue Fucker Carlson for being the primary cause of her son's death
soldierant
(6,942 posts)and I'm a bit surprised not to see more people feeling the same.
It's quite possible tht, in Texas, it would have been impossible to keep a 10-year-old safe from CoViD without a lockdown - and I can see that may not have been possible - But I can't help feeling some anger.
jimfields33
(16,067 posts)The parents were vaccinated. Stories always leave out pertinent information.
Jerry2144
(2,126 posts)The child was too young to be eligible for a vaccine. He has to rely upon everyone else not being a carrier so that he is protected. And that is the source of my anger- those people who could be vaccinated and wear masks and social distance but do not do any of that. If the virus would only infect those people and never infect anyone else who cant be protected, then it would be different.
That child, and the millions of other children and vulnerable people, is exactly why I am vaccinated, wear a mask, social distance, and minimize unnecessary trips into public spaces
jimfields33
(16,067 posts)Now they cause death. Terrible!
Wingus Dingus
(8,059 posts)Doodley
(9,161 posts)have the highest number of covid deaths in America.
sarisataka
(18,883 posts)I don't see it mentioned in the article
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Maskless mandates, not eligible for a shot, jammed into maskless schools. Kids are sitting ducks in 3rd-world countries like Texas and Florida.
sarisataka
(18,883 posts)The child wasn't eligible to be vaccinated regardless of if the family wished him to get it or not. They have been talking so much about younger ages lately I was having wishful thoughts.
BlueLucy
(1,609 posts)25% survival with surgery not to mention the many surgeries, infections, and complications that could happen leading to death after surgery.
Response to ecstatic (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
LakeArenal
(28,863 posts)I would not have made that choice.
But its the mothers decision. I hope she can live with it. Especially watching Special Olympics.
Would the woman be able to decide if her child in Utero had developed such a condition as a child born without legs?
Its such a dark hard decision.
Vinca
(50,323 posts)but not this horrible situation. What an awful choice for the mother, but given the odds of survival and the best outcome I think she made the right decision.
LakeArenal
(28,863 posts)Sometimes there is no good solution
But my question still stands. If this was the womb...?
Vinca
(50,323 posts)Mariana
(14,861 posts)In most states she would, at any rate. For the time being.
hedda_foil
(16,376 posts)LakeArenal
(28,863 posts)yardwork
(61,748 posts)And imagine the life of pain and additional surgeries even if he had lived. I would have made the same choice as the mom. Poor child. Let him pass in peace.
LakeArenal
(28,863 posts)I just think there wouldnt be a choice given if it was in a womb.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)LakeArenal
(28,863 posts)Whatthe_Firetruck
(558 posts)...Woulda made the kid a quadriplegic. I have seen relatively healthy quadriplegics be okay, typing or painting with stuff in their mouths, but this kid most likely would have severe health problems.
Then there's the care. Someone like this needs it round the clock, and if your family isn't well-off or have gold plated insurance, that's usually the mom. And if she has other kids, what of them? Will mom have any time for them? What about mom and her needs? Attendants can do it in shifts to get a break or respite, but a parenral caregiver has to be there 24/7. I don't know their situation.
I understand her choice, difficult as it was.
LakeArenal
(28,863 posts)Response to LakeArenal (Reply #16)
Whatthe_Firetruck This message was self-deleted by its author.
wnylib
(21,728 posts)Yes, even quadriplegics can live full and satisfying lives. But this child would also have had chronic kidney disease and eventually kidney failure, plus lung and heart disease and very likely some cognitive brain damage, plus continued possibility of blood clots and strokes as a result of the multiple systems failure that led to the need for a decision. And that's IF he beat the 25% odds.
If his parents are not rich and if they don't have a top of the line insurance policy, the child would probably not have received the follow up care necessary to sustain life, or to treat the multiple system diseases adequately, or provide him with artificial limbs (if possible in his case), or a motorized wheel chair, home hospital bed or any of the other multiple devices, medicines, and home nurses that he would have needed. The child would have vegetated and died young in the end.
She made the best decision that she could in the circumstances.
LakeArenal
(28,863 posts)I made an error on plegic. I never dissed her choice.
wnylib
(21,728 posts)while I was typing.
LakeArenal
(28,863 posts)Hekate
(90,953 posts)
to imagining performance in the Special Olympics as a quadriplegic with all 4 limbs gone.
25% survival rate means everything inside is pretty much wrecked. As a mother myself I would decide to simply allow my child to stop suffering.
LakeArenal
(28,863 posts)I wish this woman the best. Not the worst.
Maybe you cant see it but I find an equivalency in if it was not born some PTB would leave a woman no choice but to bear this child.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)She was at least spared the burden of even briefly facing that decision. If the authorities in hospital and government believed the surgeries could give her child a viable chance at life, his mother would not have been offered this final choice.
The choice was whether to amputate when it was believed by the experts that this last, desperate effort to save his life would fail. She was allowed that choice because she was his mother and for her own sake, so she could know she did everything possible, and she chose the most "humane and compassionate thing she could do for her child."
LakeArenal
(28,863 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)no doubt too horrified to think the rest through. He was a happy, beautiful boy in his picture.
LakeArenal
(28,863 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)skipped children (though I'm no more likely to thank a diety than the virus. )
I just looked up the figures again, Lake, and was glad to see that, even with increased rates of infection in children, fewer than 700 have died since the beginning. This is compared with roughly 50,000 deaths of children from all causes during the pandemic. This little boy basically was struck by virus lightning.
And his mother also, who I rather like to think is finding some comfort in belief in a benevolent diety.
LisaL
(44,980 posts)NT
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)of course, legal alternative to parental consent would be obtained.
LisaL
(44,980 posts)in the child's best interest, they could have gone to court.
Without hospital going to court, mother gets to decide whether to do the surgeries or not.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Some of the most dreadful things that happen to people happen to their children. I'm glad she has family to help her.
sarisataka
(18,883 posts)I will not second guess the mother's choice while comfortably sitting in my chair.
yardwork
(61,748 posts)COVID-19 is a cruel disease.
Deuxcents
(16,397 posts)I hope this mother has all the support she needs as this is most definitely a life changing experience. Not one can say what they would do if confronted with a choice like this. I do hope that if Im ever in such a position as this child was in, my family would have mercy n let me go.
leftyladyfrommo
(18,874 posts)Mz Pip
(27,456 posts)Good thing the Texas pro-life crowd didnt get wind of this and start protests demanding the child be kept alive at all costs against the mothers wishes. What a circus that would have been. Terry Schiavo all over again.
Hopefully, the mother will be able to grieve in peace. What a horrible choice to be forced to make.
Have you seen anything about Texas "Pro Lifers" that makes you think they would give a good God Damn about any child once it's out of the womb?
Crunchy Frog
(26,698 posts)they will do it, I believe.
lindysalsagal
(20,784 posts)NOT at attempt to preserve life.
ShazzieB
(16,594 posts)Of course we both know the answer to that!
calimary
(81,560 posts)Ilsa
(61,710 posts)I hope she can get the counseling and comfort she needs right now.
I hope everyone in Texas hears this story.
Mysterian
(4,599 posts)There is far too much pain in the world for it to have been created by a benevolent being.
ck4829
(35,096 posts)Government ignored the pandemic, it valued "owning the libs" as a higher calling.
The same government decided to disregard anything pandemic-related, since Obama created all that jazz.
Trump originally saw the pandemic as a "war" when it became an issue that affected everyone but, in typical Trump fashion, got bored with it in about 2 weeks
The state of Texas where this happened has shown breathtaking incompetence on this issue
And our healthcare system as a whole, I bet if we got away from it being profit-oriented and more aimed at therapies and cures regardless of money of patients or money in the bank of institutions, I bet we have medical technology that would replace the boy's heart function or limbs.
Crunchy Frog
(26,698 posts)joetheman
(1,450 posts)calimary
(81,560 posts)This one cuts deep.
flying_wahini
(6,684 posts)progressoid
(50,009 posts)I can't imagine what she's going through.
madaboutharry
(40,244 posts)May he Rest In Peace. I hope his family will be embraced with love and support.
Skittles
(153,258 posts)nope
samnsara
(17,656 posts)LittleGirl
(8,292 posts)Just heartbreaking.
Patton French
(790 posts)Hekate
(90,953 posts)
and what happened to him is a known complication.
With only 25% possibility of survival after even extreme mutilation, and with 100% certainty of extreme suffering as a mother I would have made the same decision.
Greybnk48
(10,179 posts)25% of survival even with quadruple amputation? That poor kid, and that poor mom (and dad, and family).
Dorian Gray
(13,515 posts)that poor baby.
BadGimp
(4,022 posts)BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)Never.
PatrickforB
(14,602 posts)spend the rest of his life with only a torso, would be a fate worse than death.
To me, it is quality of life, not life itself, that is sacred. That is why we have do not resuscitate orders and living wills. This is why several states allow assisted suicides in cases where there is a terminal diagnosis with growing agonizing pain.
Prayers with that mom.
LisaL
(44,980 posts)In this child's case, he likely had damage to his other organs. We know his heart was damaged. If the heart wasn't pumping blood well, his brain could have been damaged as well. If he survived, his life would most likely be extremely difficult.
I think this was the right decision, to not continue to let him suffer.
PatrickforB
(14,602 posts)Sucha NastyWoman
(2,759 posts)That already born children are not worth saving, no matter what.
orleans
(34,088 posts)ismnotwasm
(42,022 posts)Shes studying to be a lawyer.
But not every person or situation is the same, and I wouldnt presume to judge that mother.