Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WarGamer

(12,485 posts)
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 08:05 PM Oct 2021

Who pays Corporate Taxes?

It's a great topic.

FWIW, as I've opined here previously... increased Corporate Taxation is NOT the way to get into the pockets of the wealthy.


5 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
DUH! The Corporation, Mr. Apple and Mr. Alphabet.
0 (0%)
Consumers
3 (60%)
Employees
0 (0%)
Retirees
0 (0%)
Stockholders
0 (0%)
#2-5
2 (40%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who pays Corporate Taxes? (Original Post) WarGamer Oct 2021 OP
For those who are curious... WarGamer Oct 2021 #1
It depends on the product being sold. Zeitghost Oct 2021 #2
So in other words... WarGamer Oct 2021 #3
Depends. Igel Oct 2021 #6
And FWIW Zeitghost Oct 2021 #4
I know... wink wink. WarGamer Oct 2021 #5

WarGamer

(12,485 posts)
1. For those who are curious...
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 08:22 PM
Oct 2021

I'm an advocate of the following

1) Some iteration of a Wealth Tax. The UK Wealth Tax Commission did great work on the topic.

2) "Per transaction" Wall Street Trading fees. Start at $0.01 a share for stocks under $5/share and up to $10/share for stocks over $500

3) Taxing unrealized gains, other wise the richest man in the world, Elon Musk can pay nearly ZERO taxes except when he is FORCED to execute some options. Theoretically... someone worth 100 Billion dollars could pay ZERO in taxes if he lives in an AirBnB, rides UBER, takes no salary and lives off of the millions he cashed out a few years earlier.

4) Tax Capital Gains as regular Income. It's bad enough that some asshole playing golf made $500k in an hour a couple mornings ago when TSLA stock took off but it's even worse that he doesn't pay at least 39.6% on it

5) I'm not opposed to a VAT tax for a set period of time with checks mailed out to lower income families and individuals to cover their VAT monthly.

Zeitghost

(3,873 posts)
2. It depends on the product being sold.
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 08:24 PM
Oct 2021

The cost of any tax is split between the producer and the consumer in amounts proportional to the relative price elasticity of the product being sold.

With a product like gasoline that has very inelastic demand, the price is almost completely passed on to the consumer through higher prices. With luxury goods that have very elastic demand the price is mostly absorbed by the producer in the form of lost business.

WarGamer

(12,485 posts)
3. So in other words...
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 08:32 PM
Oct 2021

Things that ordinary people buy the most will cost more.

And I'd argue that if Ferrari (RACE) pays more US taxes they'll tack it onto the MSRP.

Corporations have a fiduciary duty to their stockholders. They will ALWAYS adjust the price of goods sold to maintain a profit level expected by the investors.

And nowadays those investors include individuals, in their IRA and investment accounts and Institutions like CALPRS, the California retirement fund that relies on stock market PROFITS to pay benefits to retired school teachers, police officers, DMV workers, Social Workers and Nurses who spent decades in County Hospitals.

Igel

(35,362 posts)
6. Depends.
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 08:57 PM
Oct 2021

If the price can be increased without crashing demand, consumers.

Employees also can take a hit. As it is, employees have had compensation increase quite a bit in the last 10, 15 years, but haven't seen it in their paychecks--I've gotten raises every year for the last decade and almost every cent has gone to keep my health/etc. insurance payment about flat. (There's a reason that they talk "wages" and not "compensation"--but then turn around and talk "compensation" for upper-level management, and not "wages".)

But you rightly point out, contrary to a common opinion, that shareholders are a truly mixed bag and some of the largest are retirement funds.

Ultimately, though, corporations are people with a veneer of separate personhood. You can't point to the corporation, every time you try you point to people. Managers, investors, employees. In the same way that a union is also a corporation, or Greenpeace, or a church, but you can't point to the union, Greenpeace, or church--at best, you can point to the building that the people spend time in.

Who pays depends on pricing and employee/investor flexibility. But it's always people, and since most people are rather ordinary, that means ordinary people.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who pays Corporate Taxes?