General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy is the press rooting for a Democratic loss in Virginia? Thumbs on the scale.
Sticking close to the medias preferred script, Axios this week reported that the walls were caving in on Democrat Terry McAuliffe, whos caught in a surprisingly close race in Virginias governors race. It was clear the McAuliffe campaign has taken on an air of tension bordering on panic, Axios announced.
Proof of the panic attack? McAuliffe cut off one television interview last week, the outlet claimed. That seems like thin confirmation, considering candidates juggle media interviews all the time. Plus, the Democratic did no such thing he agreed to a 10-minute interview with a local Sinclair TV station and actually gave them 11 minutes.
Is McAuliffes campaign in a state of panic? Axios provided no tangible evidence that it is. But the press seems to be rooting for a Democratic loss in Virginia, so the panic claim gets widely aired. Eager to portray Joe Bidens presidency as on the verge of collapse, the press is excitedly pushing the governors race across the Potomac as a potentially cataclysmic event for the entire Democratic Party.
Virginias gubernatorial election is more important than ever as a national barometer a CNN headline announced this month. What CNN and everyone else covering the race means is that if Democrats lose, the Virginia race will function as a national barometer. If Republicans lose, it wont mean a thing. Note theres a governors race in New Jersey this year as well, and a Democrat is expected to win with ease. For some reason, thats not a barometer of anything.
https://pressrun.media/p/why-is-the-press-rooting-for-a-democratic
Me.
(35,454 posts)or will be until they start being locked up
NBachers
(17,108 posts)brooklynite
(94,552 posts)Is it factually untrue that the race is close?
Is it factually true (or unlikely) that the McAuliffe campaign isn't happy with the situation and might be tense?
empedocles
(15,751 posts)My subjective sense is that there is the usual, 'if it bleeds, it leads', to some degree. Biden bleeds more than, 'youngkin, trump in khaki's'.
However, there was, a surprising lone article dedicated to trashing the well known Dem AG candidate Herring, as 'self-styled people's lawyer'. [ No mention of the 'con activist opponent for AG at all. At the lower level motives could come from a lot of places].
babylonsister
(171,065 posts)pretty damn close this am on Morning Joe imo.
Video here:
https://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe
MFM008
(19,808 posts)Has been accurate about anything lately.
They had Californias Newsom down by
6 points 3 weeks out from his win.
I no longer look at any poll not even 538.
If we mobilize dems in 2 VA. counties to come out we win.
Its much the same here in WA.
King and Pierce counties really decide the elections in this state.
onecaliberal
(32,858 posts)Than when he was first elected. Fuck the traitor media. They are not in our side and while many of them arent as overt as Faux, they are nonetheless responsible for radicalizing the traitors on the right by refusing to tell the truth and stop pretending their positions are normal or Democratic.
Qutzupalotl
(14,311 posts)Media owners are extremely rich and would pay more taxes. Its in their self-interest to damage Democrats.
Amishman
(5,557 posts)The media is just one giant tabloid now, peddling shock value to maximize profits.
moondust
(19,981 posts)lawless incompetence is more profitable for corporate media and investors?
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)in California...some action or external happening 'saved' McAuliffe.
nevergiveup
(4,760 posts)The press feeds off of drama.
sop
(10,177 posts)They're laying the groundwork for 2022, making the coming Republican takeover appear more plausible. After all, if McAuliffe can lose in a state that Joe Biden and Mark Warner won by double-digits in 2020, then anything is possible.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Democrats losing in Virginia will allow for months and months of stories asking if the Biden presidency is on life support.
A Democratic win in Virginia won't allow for that narrative.
appalachiablue
(41,131 posts)Last edited Wed Oct 27, 2021, 01:22 PM - Edit history (1)
on ratings and links to power. I've seen more strong McAuliffe ads recently while Youngkin looks sweatier and less confident in his which is encouraging. And GOTV in the state. My money's on the Democrat keeping Virginia Blue!
FloridaBlues
(4,008 posts)Lets hope Terry wins by large enough amount.
LiberalFighter
(50,927 posts)Instead of just the media name.
In this case it was Sarah Mucha. Who had formerly been with CNN.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Botany
(70,504 posts)This 6 corporations own 90 % of the "news media" and they see their job as to prop up the wealthy and the republicans
by selling "both sides do it" crap and that liberals and dem's ideas are not what America really wants even though those
ideas are what the vast majority of Americans want.
BTW Joe is doing a great job and despite the ignorant crap on Morning Ho this AM about McAuliffe's misstep on
talking about the vaccine has his campaign in a panic (he spoke the truth and if some mouth breather anti vax
person is upset ... oh well they were not going to vote for him anyway) he should win VA easily.
* https://www.democraticunderground.com/100215969015
onenote
(42,702 posts)Last edited Wed Oct 27, 2021, 07:32 PM - Edit history (1)
First, who knew that movie studios like Universal, Marvel, Miramax, Pixar, Paramount, and Warner Bros were "news media"? Or that ESPN, MTV, Nick Jr(!!), CMT, HBO, Showtime, Jeopardy(!) were news media. And talk about out of date -- Jeopardy has been produced by Sony (which isn't on this list even though it is one of the Big Five movie studio conglomerates) since 2002. And Time Warner has been broken into several pieces: the cable systems have primarily been owned by Charter since 2016, the various Warner media programming entities (HBO, CNN, Cartoon, TNT, Warner Studios etc etc) have been owned by ATT since 2018 (and ATT is in the process of spinning those assets off to Discovery.) Time Warner sold Time Magazine to Meredith Corp in 2018. Disney sold Miramax more than 10 years ago. Smithsonian Channel is "notable" mostly for the fact that its available in less than 30 percent of US tv households and isn't watched by most of those. And here are some actual "news media" that aren't on this list that supposedly represents 90 percent of all news media: USA Today, Washington Post, New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Sinclair Broadcasting, Charter Communications, DISH TV/Echostar, Newsweek, US News and World Report, Tribune Broadcasting (which also owns the Chicago Tribune), Nexstar Media Group (largest owner of TV stations in US), Gannett (largest owner of newspapers in US by circulation), Bloomberg, TEGNA, Scripps, Hearst, Advance Publications. and on and on and on. I haven't even bothered to mention radio stations. And then there is new media: Yahoo, Google, Facebook, AOL...all of which are news sources. Or Spanish language sources, such as Univision.
The notion that 90 percent of the "news media" is owned by six corporations such a bald-faced lie, but it persists.
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)For the same reason many were rooting for Black tRump twin Larry Elder to win California. But they didn't get what they wanted. Gov. Newsom smoked the clown like a ham, and then some. The NY Times said that Gavin Newsom 'survived' recall. Survived? Then I saw another headline along the lines of "But now comes the hard part, governing." I mean damn, DeathSentence has effectively been murdering people in Florida with his NO mask Mandates, and now he's wanting to hire police who don't believe in vaccinating, and police are dropping like flies from covid-19. DeathSentence whose effectively murdering people with his no mask mandates, and the press is only NOW really starting to go after him? I mean damn, these corporate, money-grubbing media hacks on television and in the newspaper are so full of shit. Most almost never mention how polarizing and un-American the GQP Party is, and most never mention how much the GQP/US Taliban party is obstructing justice. Most of these newspapers were harping and fomenting about how BIDEN mission in leaving Afghanistan was a disaster, and even going back further than Afghanistan, i remember one headline along the lines of Can Biden reach out and work with Republicans? I don't recalling many headlines asking if tRump will reach out and work with Dems when he was president. It's sickening.
Most in the corporate press, and in online papers want tRump or someone like him back as president so that they can make more monies in ad revenues, because if you remember, during the early months of the Biden Administration, you had clowns actually saying that Joe Biden's administration is too boring/vanilla. Most of the corporate media loved the fat, rolling train wreck that IS tRump, and lest we not forget that famous sentiment echoed by Les Monvees about Donald Trump: It May Not Be Good for America, but Its Damn Good for CBS. So, tearing up the country and world is a good thing, even though tRump/GQP US/Taliban Party is destroying our country and world? I'm so sick of most of these corporate shills and un-American assholes.
Wounded Bear
(58,654 posts)onenote
(42,702 posts)The media is making up the story that its close. It's close. If you think just because the polls were off in California that the same thing will be true in Virginia you're ignoring history, both of Virginia elections and of the California recall.
First, in 2008 Obama defeated McCain in Virginia by six points. A year later, repub Bob McDonell defeated an admittedly weak Democratic opponent by 17 points. In 2012, Obama again took the state, defeating Romney by around four points. A year later, McAuliffe defeated a loony-toon RW nut, Ken Cucinelli, by around 2 points (56,000 votes) with Terry getting just under 48 percent of the votes -- but for the presence of a Libertarian third party candidate on the ballot, who got 6.5 of the vote, there's a good chance McAuliffe would have lost. In 2016, Hillary took Virginia by five points; a more mainstream republican, Ed Gillespie, lost to Northam a year later by 8 points, suggesting that there is more of a Trumpian segment in Virginia than folks want to admit.
So history suggests in and of itself that this is a close race involving a former governor who barely won election the first time he ran.
And as for the polls and comparisons to California: the polls began showing a turn towards Newsom three weeks before election day, small at first and then quickly broadening such that by one week out (the same as we are in Virginia), the polls had Newsom winning by double digits. There are no polls that I know of that suggest that is the pattern in Virginia.
I'm sorry if this post upsets people. Hell, it upsets me, a life long Virginia Democrat who has been donating to and volunteering for McAuliffe during this campaign and who will be working for him on election day. And I'm not saying Terry can't win; he can, and I hope with all my might that he will. But as disheartening as it is that this race is in fact close, it also is disheartening that some here feel the need to look for scapegoats, like the media, rather than deal with reality.
Martin68
(22,800 posts)Youngkin. I suggest changing the newspaper you subscribe to.