Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,991 posts)
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 11:53 AM Oct 2021

Why is the press rooting for a Democratic loss in Virginia? Thumbs on the scale.

Sticking close to the media’s preferred script, Axios this week reported that the walls were caving in on Democrat Terry McAuliffe, who’s caught in a surprisingly close race in Virginia’s governor’s race. “It was clear the McAuliffe campaign has taken on an air of tension — bordering on panic,” Axios announced.

Proof of the “panic” attack? “McAuliffe cut off one television interview last week,” the outlet claimed. That seems like thin confirmation, considering candidates juggle media interviews all the time. Plus, the Democratic did no such thing — he agreed to a 10-minute interview with a local Sinclair TV station and actually gave them 11 minutes.

Is McAuliffe’s campaign in a state of “panic”? Axios provided no tangible evidence that it is. But the press seems to be rooting for a Democratic loss in Virginia, so the “panic” claim gets widely aired. Eager to portray Joe Biden’s presidency as on the verge of collapse, the press is excitedly pushing the governor’s race across the Potomac as a potentially cataclysmic event for the entire Democratic Party.

“Virginia’s gubernatorial election is more important than ever as a national barometer” a CNN headline announced this month. What CNN and everyone else covering the race means is that if Democrats lose, the Virginia race will function as a national barometer. If Republicans lose, it won’t mean a thing. Note there’s a governor’s race in New Jersey this year as well, and a Democrat is expected to win with ease. For some reason, that’s not a “barometer” of anything.

https://pressrun.media/p/why-is-the-press-rooting-for-a-democratic

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why is the press rooting for a Democratic loss in Virginia? Thumbs on the scale. (Original Post) kpete Oct 2021 OP
Because Autocracy Is More Fun For Them Me. Oct 2021 #1
I've been donating from out of state, I will continue to donate. NBachers Oct 2021 #2
Which press (besides Fox News et al) is "rooting for a Democratic loss"? brooklynite Oct 2021 #3
I am a WaPo subscriber and regular follower of Virginia in the race. empedocles Oct 2021 #10
Sam Stein via Politico came babylonsister Oct 2021 #19
Find me a poll that MFM008 Oct 2021 #21
Same reason they told us Newsom was going to be recalled, then he won by a wider margin onecaliberal Oct 2021 #4
Harming Dems would put Biden's agenda in jeopardy. Qutzupalotl Oct 2021 #5
Because drama drives ratings, which increase profits Amishman Oct 2021 #6
Perhaps... moondust Oct 2021 #7
I don't believe anything Axios has to say. We will win Virginia...and then they will say just like Demsrule86 Oct 2021 #8
It is more exciting if a particular election is a horse race. nevergiveup Oct 2021 #9
"Why is the press rooting for a Democratic loss in Virginia?" sop Oct 2021 #11
Chaos and disarray drives ratings more than the status quo. Drunken Irishman Oct 2021 #12
Horserace 'reporting' sells, corporate owners are focused appalachiablue Oct 2021 #13
Virginia will remain blue but who is to say if Younkin will concede or contest the race. FloridaBlues Oct 2021 #14
Personally, I believe the name of the actual reporter should be identified in reports like this. LiberalFighter Oct 2021 #15
Agree and thanks. Same for Botany's Big Reminder. Hortensis Oct 2021 #17
The word has gone out get Biden (who is doing a great job*) and the dems. Botany Oct 2021 #16
Not the dreaded (and ridiculous) six corporations own 90 percent of the news media nonsense again. onenote Oct 2021 #22
"Why is the press rooting for a Democratic loss in Virginia? Thumbs on the scale." LenaBaby61 Oct 2021 #18
They're all about the horse race...nt Wounded Bear Oct 2021 #20
I'm sorry, but those of you who don't think this is a close race are putting your heads in the sand onenote Oct 2021 #23
The Washington Post is doing exactly the opposite. They have written scathing editorials against Martin68 Oct 2021 #24

brooklynite

(94,552 posts)
3. Which press (besides Fox News et al) is "rooting for a Democratic loss"?
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 12:01 PM
Oct 2021

Is it factually untrue that the race is close?

Is it factually true (or unlikely) that the McAuliffe campaign isn't happy with the situation and might be tense?

empedocles

(15,751 posts)
10. I am a WaPo subscriber and regular follower of Virginia in the race.
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 12:16 PM
Oct 2021

My subjective sense is that there is the usual, 'if it bleeds, it leads', to some degree. Biden bleeds more than, 'youngkin, trump in khaki's'.

However, there was, a surprising lone article dedicated to trashing the well known Dem AG candidate Herring, as 'self-styled people's lawyer'. [ No mention of the 'con activist opponent for AG at all. At the lower level motives could come from a lot of places].

MFM008

(19,808 posts)
21. Find me a poll that
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 05:04 PM
Oct 2021

Has been accurate about anything lately.
They had Californias Newsom down by
6 points 3 weeks out from his win.
I no longer look at any poll not even 538.
If we mobilize dems in 2 VA. counties to come out we win.
Its much the same here in WA.
King and Pierce counties really decide the elections in this state.

onecaliberal

(32,858 posts)
4. Same reason they told us Newsom was going to be recalled, then he won by a wider margin
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 12:02 PM
Oct 2021

Than when he was first elected. Fuck the traitor media. They are not in our side and while many of them aren’t as overt as Faux, they are nonetheless responsible for radicalizing the traitors on the right by refusing to tell the truth and stop pretending their positions are normal or Democratic.

Qutzupalotl

(14,311 posts)
5. Harming Dems would put Biden's agenda in jeopardy.
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 12:05 PM
Oct 2021

Media owners are extremely rich and would pay more taxes. It’s in their self-interest to damage Democrats.

Amishman

(5,557 posts)
6. Because drama drives ratings, which increase profits
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 12:08 PM
Oct 2021

The media is just one giant tabloid now, peddling shock value to maximize profits.

Demsrule86

(68,565 posts)
8. I don't believe anything Axios has to say. We will win Virginia...and then they will say just like
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 12:09 PM
Oct 2021

in California...some action or external happening 'saved' McAuliffe.

sop

(10,177 posts)
11. "Why is the press rooting for a Democratic loss in Virginia?"
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 12:20 PM
Oct 2021

They're laying the groundwork for 2022, making the coming Republican takeover appear more plausible. After all, if McAuliffe can lose in a state that Joe Biden and Mark Warner won by double-digits in 2020, then anything is possible.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
12. Chaos and disarray drives ratings more than the status quo.
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 12:24 PM
Oct 2021

Democrats losing in Virginia will allow for months and months of stories asking if the Biden presidency is on life support.

A Democratic win in Virginia won't allow for that narrative.

appalachiablue

(41,131 posts)
13. Horserace 'reporting' sells, corporate owners are focused
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 12:25 PM
Oct 2021

Last edited Wed Oct 27, 2021, 01:22 PM - Edit history (1)

on ratings and links to power. I've seen more strong McAuliffe ads recently while Youngkin looks sweatier and less confident in his which is encouraging. And GOTV in the state. My money's on the Democrat keeping Virginia Blue!

FloridaBlues

(4,008 posts)
14. Virginia will remain blue but who is to say if Younkin will concede or contest the race.
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 12:33 PM
Oct 2021

Let’s hope Terry wins by large enough amount.

LiberalFighter

(50,927 posts)
15. Personally, I believe the name of the actual reporter should be identified in reports like this.
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 12:52 PM
Oct 2021

Instead of just the media name.

In this case it was Sarah Mucha. Who had formerly been with CNN.

Botany

(70,504 posts)
16. The word has gone out get Biden (who is doing a great job*) and the dems.
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 12:55 PM
Oct 2021


This 6 corporations own 90 % of the "news media" and they see their job as to prop up the wealthy and the republicans
by selling "both sides do it" crap and that liberals and dem's ideas are not what America really wants even though those
ideas are what the vast majority of Americans want.

BTW Joe is doing a great job and despite the ignorant crap on Morning Ho this AM about McAuliffe's misstep on
talking about the vaccine has his campaign in a panic (he spoke the truth and if some mouth breather anti vax
person is upset ... oh well they were not going to vote for him anyway) he should win VA easily.

* https://www.democraticunderground.com/100215969015

onenote

(42,702 posts)
22. Not the dreaded (and ridiculous) six corporations own 90 percent of the news media nonsense again.
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 05:50 PM
Oct 2021

Last edited Wed Oct 27, 2021, 07:32 PM - Edit history (1)

First, who knew that movie studios like Universal, Marvel, Miramax, Pixar, Paramount, and Warner Bros were "news media"? Or that ESPN, MTV, Nick Jr(!!), CMT, HBO, Showtime, Jeopardy(!) were news media. And talk about out of date -- Jeopardy has been produced by Sony (which isn't on this list even though it is one of the Big Five movie studio conglomerates) since 2002. And Time Warner has been broken into several pieces: the cable systems have primarily been owned by Charter since 2016, the various Warner media programming entities (HBO, CNN, Cartoon, TNT, Warner Studios etc etc) have been owned by ATT since 2018 (and ATT is in the process of spinning those assets off to Discovery.) Time Warner sold Time Magazine to Meredith Corp in 2018. Disney sold Miramax more than 10 years ago. Smithsonian Channel is "notable" mostly for the fact that its available in less than 30 percent of US tv households and isn't watched by most of those. And here are some actual "news media" that aren't on this list that supposedly represents 90 percent of all news media: USA Today, Washington Post, New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Sinclair Broadcasting, Charter Communications, DISH TV/Echostar, Newsweek, US News and World Report, Tribune Broadcasting (which also owns the Chicago Tribune), Nexstar Media Group (largest owner of TV stations in US), Gannett (largest owner of newspapers in US by circulation), Bloomberg, TEGNA, Scripps, Hearst, Advance Publications. and on and on and on. I haven't even bothered to mention radio stations. And then there is new media: Yahoo, Google, Facebook, AOL...all of which are news sources. Or Spanish language sources, such as Univision.

The notion that 90 percent of the "news media" is owned by six corporations such a bald-faced lie, but it persists.


LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
18. "Why is the press rooting for a Democratic loss in Virginia? Thumbs on the scale."
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 01:19 PM
Oct 2021

For the same reason many were rooting for Black tRump twin Larry Elder to win California. But they didn't get what they wanted. Gov. Newsom smoked the clown like a ham, and then some. The NY Times said that Gavin Newsom 'survived' recall. Survived? Then I saw another headline along the lines of "But now comes the hard part, governing." I mean damn, DeathSentence has effectively been murdering people in Florida with his NO mask Mandates, and now he's wanting to hire police who don't believe in vaccinating, and police are dropping like flies from covid-19. DeathSentence whose effectively murdering people with his no mask mandates, and the press is only NOW really starting to go after him? I mean damn, these corporate, money-grubbing media hacks on television and in the newspaper are so full of shit. Most almost never mention how polarizing and un-American the GQP Party is, and most never mention how much the GQP/US Taliban party is obstructing justice. Most of these newspapers were harping and fomenting about how BIDEN mission in leaving Afghanistan was a disaster, and even going back further than Afghanistan, i remember one headline along the lines of Can Biden reach out and work with Republicans? I don't recalling many headlines asking if tRump will reach out and work with Dems when he was president. It's sickening.

Most in the corporate press, and in online papers want tRump or someone like him back as president so that they can make more monies in ad revenues, because if you remember, during the early months of the Biden Administration, you had clowns actually saying that Joe Biden's administration is too boring/vanilla. Most of the corporate media loved the fat, rolling train wreck that IS tRump, and lest we not forget that famous sentiment echoed by Les Monvees about Donald Trump: “It May Not Be Good for America, but It’s Damn Good for CBS.” So, tearing up the country and world is a good thing, even though tRump/GQP US/Taliban Party is destroying our country and world? I'm so sick of most of these corporate shills and un-American assholes.

onenote

(42,702 posts)
23. I'm sorry, but those of you who don't think this is a close race are putting your heads in the sand
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 06:13 PM
Oct 2021

The media is making up the story that its close. It's close. If you think just because the polls were off in California that the same thing will be true in Virginia you're ignoring history, both of Virginia elections and of the California recall.

First, in 2008 Obama defeated McCain in Virginia by six points. A year later, repub Bob McDonell defeated an admittedly weak Democratic opponent by 17 points. In 2012, Obama again took the state, defeating Romney by around four points. A year later, McAuliffe defeated a loony-toon RW nut, Ken Cucinelli, by around 2 points (56,000 votes) with Terry getting just under 48 percent of the votes -- but for the presence of a Libertarian third party candidate on the ballot, who got 6.5 of the vote, there's a good chance McAuliffe would have lost. In 2016, Hillary took Virginia by five points; a more mainstream republican, Ed Gillespie, lost to Northam a year later by 8 points, suggesting that there is more of a Trumpian segment in Virginia than folks want to admit.

So history suggests in and of itself that this is a close race involving a former governor who barely won election the first time he ran.

And as for the polls and comparisons to California: the polls began showing a turn towards Newsom three weeks before election day, small at first and then quickly broadening such that by one week out (the same as we are in Virginia), the polls had Newsom winning by double digits. There are no polls that I know of that suggest that is the pattern in Virginia.

I'm sorry if this post upsets people. Hell, it upsets me, a life long Virginia Democrat who has been donating to and volunteering for McAuliffe during this campaign and who will be working for him on election day. And I'm not saying Terry can't win; he can, and I hope with all my might that he will. But as disheartening as it is that this race is in fact close, it also is disheartening that some here feel the need to look for scapegoats, like the media, rather than deal with reality.


Martin68

(22,800 posts)
24. The Washington Post is doing exactly the opposite. They have written scathing editorials against
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 06:20 PM
Oct 2021

Youngkin. I suggest changing the newspaper you subscribe to.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why is the press rooting ...