Tue Nov 2, 2021, 02:53 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
Leave Joe Manchin ALONE!
This is the thread to voice how unfairly harsh people have been on Senator Joe Manchin.
Feel free to show your support for Senator Manchin. I'll start. Senator Manchin has a 100% record on supporting President Biden's agenda in Congress, to date. And this past month he has saved the country by stopping the passage of expanded social safety net programs that are just too expensive. ![]()
|
88 replies, 4153 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | OP |
Post removed | Nov 2021 | #1 | |
MontanaMama | Nov 2021 | #3 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #4 | |
Celerity | Nov 2021 | #31 | |
George II | Nov 2021 | #17 | |
Fiendish Thingy | Nov 2021 | #56 | |
George II | Nov 2021 | #62 | |
Fiendish Thingy | Nov 2021 | #80 | |
George II | Nov 2021 | #81 | |
Javaman | Nov 2021 | #47 | |
doc03 | Nov 2021 | #2 | |
Fiendish Thingy | Nov 2021 | #6 | |
FoxNewsSucks | Nov 2021 | #14 | |
Celerity | Nov 2021 | #32 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #33 | |
choie | Nov 2021 | #75 | |
BlueJac | Nov 2021 | #5 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #68 | |
CentralMass | Nov 2021 | #7 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #9 | |
Ani Yun Wiya | Nov 2021 | #8 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #11 | |
Wounded Bear | Nov 2021 | #10 | |
JohnnyRingo | Nov 2021 | #12 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #15 | |
KT2000 | Nov 2021 | #13 | |
lagomorph777 | Nov 2021 | #59 | |
FoxNewsSucks | Nov 2021 | #16 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #19 | |
Post removed | Nov 2021 | #22 | |
Celerity | Nov 2021 | #34 | |
George II | Nov 2021 | #46 | |
Celerity | Nov 2021 | #58 | |
George II | Nov 2021 | #65 | |
Celerity | Nov 2021 | #67 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #69 | |
George II | Nov 2021 | #73 | |
wellst0nev0ter | Nov 2021 | #78 | |
George II | Nov 2021 | #79 | |
wellst0nev0ter | Nov 2021 | #83 | |
Celerity | Nov 2021 | #85 | |
wellst0nev0ter | Nov 2021 | #86 | |
Celerity | Nov 2021 | #84 | |
lagomorph777 | Nov 2021 | #18 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #21 | |
Celerity | Nov 2021 | #70 | |
Torchlight | Nov 2021 | #20 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2021 | #23 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #24 | |
qazplm135 | Nov 2021 | #25 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #26 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2021 | #35 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #36 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2021 | #37 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #40 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2021 | #43 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #45 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2021 | #50 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #53 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2021 | #55 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #60 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2021 | #61 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #63 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2021 | #64 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #82 | |
George II | Nov 2021 | #66 | |
qazplm135 | Nov 2021 | #38 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2021 | #41 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #44 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2021 | #51 | |
qazplm135 | Nov 2021 | #49 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #54 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #42 | |
Celerity | Nov 2021 | #87 | |
George II | Nov 2021 | #29 | |
qazplm135 | Nov 2021 | #39 | |
George II | Nov 2021 | #48 | |
qazplm135 | Nov 2021 | #52 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #57 | |
George II | Nov 2021 | #74 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #76 | |
TheRealNorth | Nov 2021 | #27 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #30 | |
TheRealNorth | Nov 2021 | #88 | |
Brainfodder | Nov 2021 | #28 | |
48656c6c6f20 | Nov 2021 | #71 | |
bluewater | Nov 2021 | #72 | |
Meowmee | Nov 2021 | #77 |
Response to bluewater (Original post)
Post removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #1)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 02:57 PM
MontanaMama (22,024 posts)
3. Wish I could rec your post.
100% FTG
|
Response to MontanaMama (Reply #3)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 02:58 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
4. Rec the OP then!
![]() |
Response to Post removed (Reply #1)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:16 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
17. There have been 453 votes in the Senate since the term began in January.
Response to George II (Reply #17)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:43 PM
Fiendish Thingy (12,806 posts)
56. How many votes on legislation? (Not counting procedural votes) nt
Response to Fiendish Thingy (Reply #56)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:56 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
62. I don't know. You can find them on the internet, I'm not poring over 453 votes.
Response to George II (Reply #62)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 07:08 PM
Fiendish Thingy (12,806 posts)
80. I believe the answer is two, possibly three
The American Rescue plan, the debt ceiling and the BIF.
The rest were procedural votes and nominations. Your Manchin sycophancy is duly noted. |
Response to Fiendish Thingy (Reply #80)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 07:21 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
81. Try a LOT more than two or three. If three were the case, everyone's ratings would be....
...100% or 66% or 33% or 0%. If only two the ratings would be 100% or 50% or 0%.
That's the math. |
Response to bluewater (Original post)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 02:56 PM
doc03 (33,295 posts)
2. Let's go Manchin. nt
Response to doc03 (Reply #2)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 02:59 PM
Fiendish Thingy (12,806 posts)
6. I see what you did there. Nt
Response to doc03 (Reply #2)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:13 PM
FoxNewsSucks (10,162 posts)
14. hee hee hee hee
![]() |
Response to Celerity (Reply #32)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:53 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
33. lol I finally got the reference!
![]() |
Response to bluewater (Original post)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 02:58 PM
BlueJac (7,838 posts)
5. Just can't do that.
Response to BlueJac (Reply #5)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 05:26 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
68. Understandable.
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to bluewater (Original post)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:00 PM
CentralMass (14,837 posts)
7. To quote Manchin. "I'm sorry but I just can't do it. "
Response to bluewater (Original post)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:00 PM
Ani Yun Wiya (793 posts)
8. Give JM a chance
He needs to save the USA from the horrors of the "Green New Deal"!!!
|
Response to Ani Yun Wiya (Reply #8)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:09 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
11. Manchin's stance on the environment has nothing to do with his coal company.
![]() |
Response to bluewater (Original post)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:02 PM
Wounded Bear (56,078 posts)
10. Reminds me of this (anybody good at Photoshop?)...
![]() |
Response to bluewater (Original post)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:10 PM
JohnnyRingo (17,859 posts)
12. Although I get the sarcasm....
Last edited Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:01 PM - Edit history (1) ...I want to like Joe Manchin
Indeed I do like Joe Manchin. He's a moderate democrat who is unique in that he can hold the party position in West By God Virginia for as long as he wants. They still name things after him down there. They love him because they see him as one of their own: A decent and likeable hillbilly who works for the coal company. As of late he's had to walk a razor's edge between the party of Hillary and MAGA Fever that has invaded the Mountain State like so many rural areas. Perhaps he's outlasted his shelf life as a democrat, but I'm not sure who could replace him with a D next to their name. |
Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #12)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:13 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
15. Seriously, I honestly thought Manchin would be satisfied with all the concessions
that President Biden has already made in trying to win Manchin's support for the Build Back Better reconciliation bill.
I truly believed that by now Manchin would publicly state he supports the President's latest framework. But he has not. It's inexplicable. ![]() |
Response to bluewater (Original post)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:11 PM
KT2000 (20,360 posts)
13. Did Manchin enjoy the trump years
because what he is doing may very well send us there again. Biden's polling numbers have been affected by what he is doing. He has become cruel.
|
Response to KT2000 (Reply #13)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:52 PM
lagomorph777 (30,613 posts)
59. Yes, he did.
Response to bluewater (Original post)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:15 PM
FoxNewsSucks (10,162 posts)
16. 100% record?
Didn't he block Biden's nominee?
I know he voted for MF45's nominees, but if I remember right, he objected to Biden's. One more reason to add to the FTGs |
Response to FoxNewsSucks (Reply #16)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:18 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
19. Nope, Manchin has a 100% voting record supporting Biden, to date.
Manchin supporters that feel people have been too harsh on him this past month point to the 538 article showing that.
To be fair, it's a short record this early in Biden's presidency, but it is 100%. ![]() |
Response to bluewater (Reply #19)
Post removed
Response to FoxNewsSucks (Reply #16)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:56 PM
Celerity (36,977 posts)
34. Neena Tanden's nomination was withdrawn after Manchin publicly went on the record and said No
plus he and Sinema have gutted out $3.8 trillion and counting, including many of Biden's centrepiece programmes, from the 2 infrastructure bills
that 100% record (which is for final votes only) is extremely misleading |
Response to Celerity (Reply #34)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:20 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
46. Manchin wasn't the first one to balk at Tanden's nomination, it was the Committee chairman....
In fact the nomination was withdrawn before the Budget Committee voted on her nomination. Manchin isn't on the Budget Committee.
|
Response to George II (Reply #46)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:51 PM
Celerity (36,977 posts)
58. Sander's never came out and said nope, no way, like Manchin did. Manchin blocked Neera Tanden for
OMB head and forced Biden to pull the plug on her nomination when he went public, on the record, as a no vote for her nomination.
Sen. Manchin opposes Neera Tanden as Biden's budget chief, imperiling nomination https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/joe-manchin-comes-out-against-neera-tanden-biden-s-omb-n1258387 White House pulls nomination of embattled budget chief pick Neera Tanden https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/white-house-pulls-nomination-embattled-budget-chief-pick-neera-tanden-n1258738 Senate Budget Committee Chair Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., clashed with Tanden, a former adviser to Hillary Clinton, during his two presidential runs. He did not take a position on her nomination.
Sanders overall has been VASTLY more supportive of Biden and his agenda overall than Manchin and Sinema have. Sanders has not blocked any bill from passing, has not gutted any bill. Sanders voted against Vilsack (he and others wanted Marcia Fudge there) in February for Secretary of Agriculture, at the urging of multiple progressive (concerned about corporate consolidation of farming that Vilsack did little to stop his first go-round as AgSec) and black farmers/civil rights groups who vehemently opposed his track record, especially over the Shirley Sherrod case. (Vilsack was easily confirmed, 92-7 and afterward, Sanders said "I think he'll be fine, but not as strong as I would like." ) His other No vote, from late spring, was against the Endless Frontier Act, when Maria Cantwell tossed in an amendment that was a $10 billion giveaway to Bezos via Blue Origin and then actively worked to scupper his amendment that would have pulled it out. The Act past easily, 68-32. Sanders materially blocked nothing via either protest vote. Unlike Manchin and Sinema, Sanders (and the vast majority of other Dems) has been tirelessly trying to get as much as is possible of Biden's agenda passed intact. It is pure sophistry to try and posit some sort of material equivalence between Manchin and Sanders in terms of deleterious actual outcomes when it comes to Biden's agenda. Manchin (and Sinema as well) have done a shedload more actual damage. |
Response to Celerity (Reply #58)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 05:04 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
65. She asked that the nomination be withdrawn before the Budget Committee voted. If there was no....
..Democratic Senator blocking her nomination she would have been confirmed.
|
Response to George II (Reply #65)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 05:25 PM
Celerity (36,977 posts)
67. she would not have been confirmed because Manchin said NO, and no Rethug was coming to her aid.
I have already put up the documentation (like I always do), you just (like you have for months) just keep on repeating the same old misinformation.
You need some new material. |
Response to Celerity (Reply #67)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 05:42 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
73. Here's a NYT article about the pushback she got. Senator Manchin's name isn't even mentioned in it:
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/10/us/politics/neera-tanden-bernie-sanders.html
And one from Politico, no mention of Manchin: https://www.politico.com/news/2021/02/10/sander-tanden-confirmation-468350 CNN, no mention of Manchin: https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/10/politics/bernie-sanders-neera-tanden-hearing/index.html Independent, no Manchin: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/bernie-sanders-neera-tanden-senate-confirmation-tweets-b1800516.html Once again, Manchin isn't even on the Budget Committee that is chaired by Sanders, and she withdrew her nomination prior to the committee voting on her. |
Response to George II (Reply #73)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 06:13 PM
wellst0nev0ter (7,509 posts)
78. And none of them saying Sanders was against her nomination
Keep digging.
|
Response to wellst0nev0ter (Reply #78)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 06:48 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
79. You have to read the articles.
Response to George II (Reply #79)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 08:17 PM
wellst0nev0ter (7,509 posts)
83. Assuming I didn't
Response to wellst0nev0ter (Reply #83)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 11:29 PM
Celerity (36,977 posts)
85. see post 84, the poster only posted articles from 9 days BEFORE Manchin came out & publicly said No
Response to Celerity (Reply #85)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 11:44 PM
wellst0nev0ter (7,509 posts)
86. Oh yeah, forgot about the twitterbot aspect
Always making the same arguments, expecting different results.
|
Response to George II (Reply #73)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 11:25 PM
Celerity (36,977 posts)
84. all your articles are from 9 days BEFORE Manchin publicly announced he was a NO on Tanden
You are engaged in clear and selective cherry-picking and attempted omissions of key facts that occurred AFTER your articles.
I also already showed that Sanders never took an official public stance. Of course the hearings were contentious. Tanden slated and smeared Sanders and many others for years (and she apologised) but even then, he never said NO, publicly on the record, like Machin came out on February 19th and did. Biden eventually pulled her nomination of March 2nd, as I already showed, as he could find no Rethug to cross over and support her, which was needed due to Manchin's defection. Manchin was the first and only Democratic Senator to officially say he was a NO. The case is CLOSED. You cannot selectively and falsely rewrite history to suit your clear anti-Sanders (and anti-AOC and other progressives deemed targets by you and others) agenda. People will hopefully always be there to correct the record. |
Response to bluewater (Original post)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:16 PM
lagomorph777 (30,613 posts)
18. He hasn't voted against everything, because he blocks it before the vote.
I've had extended debates with some here, who don't seem to understand what that means. I've since put them on full ignore, of course.
|
Response to lagomorph777 (Reply #18)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:21 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
21. Exactly, like blocking the major Build Back Better reconciliation bill
and preventing it from being voted on in the Senate would keep Senator Manchin's 100% voting record intact.
But hey, it is what it is and it would be cruel if anyone pointed out how meaningless that statistic is after watching the events of this past month. ![]() |
Response to lagomorph777 (Reply #18)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 05:31 PM
Celerity (36,977 posts)
70. Oh, they understand just fine. nt
Response to bluewater (Original post)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:18 PM
Torchlight (2,176 posts)
20. Old King Coal is a merry old soul.
Let's bow our heads together and pray he gets those kick-backs before the Christmas rush.
|
Response to bluewater (Original post)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:33 PM
NurseJackie (42,862 posts)
23. I'm certainly glad he's a Democrat instead of Republican.
Count your blessings. We're damned lucky to have him.
All the complaining and hand-wringing won't change a single thing about him. ![]() |
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #23)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:38 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
24. I prefer to believe Senator Manchin is reachable if enough Democrats call him out
and insist he do the right thing and support president Biden's Build Back Better framework.
No one is irredeemable. ![]() |
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #23)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:39 PM
qazplm135 (7,426 posts)
25. None of that
Makes him immune to criticism.
|
Response to qazplm135 (Reply #25)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:46 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
26. But is not supporting half of President Biden's major agenda really a bad thing?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to bluewater (Reply #26)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:57 PM
NurseJackie (42,862 posts)
35. Run him out and put a Republican in there... see what happens in a 51/49 Senate.
26. But is not supporting half of President Biden's major agenda really a bad thing? The alternative is worse. Apparently many want to chase him out and put a Republican in there... just to see what happens in a 51/49 Senate.
![]() Who would you like to replace him with? He's not going to change, so count your blessings. I'm glad he's one of ours and not one of theirs. |
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #35)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:00 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
36. People want to help Manchin change his views and start SUPPORTING the Build Back Better framework.
Again, I think if enough Democrats tell Senator Manchin that he is being wrongheaded in opposing the social safety net programs that he CAN change his views and start supporting the President Biden's Build Back Better framework.
No one is irredeemable. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to bluewater (Reply #36)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:03 PM
NurseJackie (42,862 posts)
37. This isn't working. The smears and attacks aren't how minds are changed.
As we've seen from another politician's public harassment, it just hardened Manchin and he dug-in his heels.
|
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #37)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:08 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
40. I don't think that Senator Manchin spends much time reading DU.
But I could be wrong.
In any case MANY people here on DU have made thoughtful and valid points detailing why senator Manchin is wrong in opposing President Biden's Build Back Better framework. Again, I hope his fellow Democratic Senators are explaining this to Senator Manchin also. I personally believe that the warranted criticism IS having a positive effect on Senator Manchin, his demeanor in recent press appearances seems less glib and more thoughtful. Perhaps when President Biden returns from Europe, he can have another one-on-one discussion with Senator Manchin in the White House and finally get thru to him. No one is unreachable. No one is irredeemable. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to bluewater (Reply #40)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:12 PM
NurseJackie (42,862 posts)
43. Of course he doesn't read DU. That's why all this hair-on-fire ranting is so silly...
... and a waste of time. But, y'all go ahead and get it out of your systems.
|
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #43)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:19 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
45. Then you weren't talking about DU when you said "it just hardened Manchin and he dug-in his heels"?
OK.
![]() Of course he doesn't read DU. That's why all this hair-on-fire ranting is so silly...
... and a waste of time. But, y'all go ahead and get it out of your systems. Thanks for participating in this thread then in any case, I respect your right to express your opinions even though I disagree with them. ![]() |
Response to bluewater (Reply #45)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:31 PM
NurseJackie (42,862 posts)
50. Lulz.
Then you weren't talking about DU when you said "it just hardened Manchin and he dug-in his heels"? Lulz. Was there any confusion when I said:
As we've seen from another politician's public harassment, it just hardened Manchin and he dug-in his heels. Games, games, games. Ridiculous. You know exactly what I said, who I was referring to, and what I meant. Encouraging this type of harassment serves no good purpose. Thanks for participating in this thread then in any case, Please. Spare me. ![]() I respect your right to express your opinions even though I disagree with them. Oh, brother. ![]() |
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #50)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:37 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
53. Enjoy the rest of your day!
![]() ![]() |
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #55)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:52 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
60. Every post is appreciated.
They all bump the thread.
![]() ![]() |
Response to bluewater (Reply #60)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:55 PM
NurseJackie (42,862 posts)
61. Okay.
![]() They all bump the thread. But they do little else. ![]() |
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #61)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:56 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
63. On a discussion forum, sometimes a little bump is all you need.
![]() ![]() I'll wait a little longer making my next response to save the bump for when this thread goes lower in the recent posts. I don't wish anyone to feel ignored! ![]() |
Response to bluewater (Reply #63)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:59 PM
NurseJackie (42,862 posts)
64. Some more than others.
![]() |
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #64)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 07:52 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
82. Absolutely!
![]() |
Response to bluewater (Reply #45)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 05:08 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
66. Did you watch his statement yesterday?
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #35)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:03 PM
qazplm135 (7,426 posts)
38. So again
None of that makes him immune to criticism.
You're pushing a strawman. People don't want to replace him with a republican, they'd just like him to stop acting like one. |
Response to qazplm135 (Reply #38)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:10 PM
NurseJackie (42,862 posts)
41. Apparently the smears and insults aren't working. What now?
![]() None of that makes him immune to criticism. ![]() ![]() People don't want to replace him with a republican, I've seen it right here on DU. Expressions abound that he may as well go ahead and declare he's a Republican. And how he's an "embarrassment to Democrats" he should be kicked out, blah-blah-blah. Silly venting.
You're pushing a strawman. No I'm not. Damage him enough... kneecap and bloody him enough... and WV-ians will choose a Republican instead of him next time. Or, maybe he'll decide to retire... and then WV will definitely elect a Republican.
Go ahead, get it out of your systems... all the attacks will make ZERO difference in outcome and the chances that this emotionally-driven tactic will backfire continue to grow. ![]() |
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #41)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:15 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
44. I think you Are selling Senator Manchin short, he IS capable of accepting criticism and can change.
I hope that President Biden invites Senator Manchin to the White House again and stresses how important the Build Back Better framework is to helping hard working families in West Virginia and the country at large.
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to bluewater (Reply #44)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:32 PM
NurseJackie (42,862 posts)
51. Lulz.
"criticism"
![]() ![]() Hysterical. |
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #41)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:30 PM
qazplm135 (7,426 posts)
49. Oh please
It's a message board. He's not getting damaged by a message board.
No one has any power here.hes a big boy and he can take criticism particularly when he's acting as he has. All you are really trying to do is squelch criticism because you don't like it not because it will damage him. And guess what, while progressives may only be a few percentage points of voters in WV, he only won by a few percentage points. So he might want to consider whether his approach to progressives make electoral sense. The damage will come from his own actions and words not ours. |
Response to qazplm135 (Reply #38)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:12 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
42. "People don't want to replace him with a republican, they'd just like him to stop acting like one"
At least to the point of accepting all the concessions President Biden has already made and to FINALLY publicly support the President's Build Back Better framework.
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to qazplm135 (Reply #38)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 11:48 PM
Celerity (36,977 posts)
87. +1
People don't want to replace him with a republican, they'd just like him to stop acting like one.
![]() ![]() |
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #23)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:49 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
29. In most of these threads bashing Manchin I've asked "who do you suggest replace him?"....
Response to George II (Reply #29)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:04 PM
qazplm135 (7,426 posts)
39. Why is that relevant
So it's either replace or no criticism? Seems like a false choice to me.
|
Response to qazplm135 (Reply #39)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:27 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
48. Because MOST of the comments I've responded to in the last week or so claimed:
"We have to get rid of Manchin", or similar language.
When asked who we should replace him with it's always "I dunno." But everyone may get their wish when (if) he runs for re-election, Paula Swearingen is running third-party, almost guaranteeing a republican election. |
Response to George II (Reply #48)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:33 PM
qazplm135 (7,426 posts)
52. Then you are pretty narrow
In the posts you look at because plenty aren't talking about replacing him except to vote in more Senators so he becomes irrelevant.
The only reason he matters is because we couldn't win in ME or NC last time around. We win those elections and we'd already have passed both bills right now with or without him. And quite frankly he's about to replace himself. Progressives in WV may only be a few percentage points of voters but he only won last time by a few percentage points. |
Response to qazplm135 (Reply #52)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 04:47 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
57. Taking a thread off on a tangent is a well know rhetorical device.
It's often used when people feel uncomfortable discussing the contents of the thread's original post.
But of course, you knew that. ![]() |
Response to bluewater (Reply #57)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 05:48 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
74. The contents of the thread's original post? You said people should leave Manchin alone. I agree....
I agree with everything you typed in your OP.
|
Response to George II (Reply #74)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 06:01 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
76. "I agree with everything you typed in your OP." Good lord, I hope NOT! lol
And this past month he has saved the country by stopping the passage of expanded social safety net programs that are just too expensive.
You agreed with that? That Manchin saved the country by stopping the passage of President Biden's expanded social safety net programs because they were just too expensive? ![]() Pardon me, well, if that's your actual opinion, thanks for sharing it. Would you mind if I quote you on that going forward? Well, honestly, I would in any case, it would be part of the public record here on DU. ![]() I mean, you DID see the ![]() Hoo baby... Well, thanks for participating in the thread in any case. ![]() |
Response to bluewater (Original post)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:47 PM
TheRealNorth (8,431 posts)
27. As soon as we no longer need him to confirm judges......
Last edited Wed Nov 3, 2021, 11:31 PM - Edit history (1) kick him to the curb.
|
Response to TheRealNorth (Reply #27)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:49 PM
bluewater (5,376 posts)
30. Grammar Nazi Time: It's "kick him the the curb."
Auto correct issue?
![]() |
Response to bluewater (Original post)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 03:48 PM
Brainfodder (5,464 posts)
28. Yeah Coal Cing is busy counting his $?
He has enough to fill bathtubs and roll around in it, so I have heard and I saw the yacht.
![]() |
Response to bluewater (Original post)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 05:33 PM
48656c6c6f20 (7,638 posts)
71. Now you've done it
I can clearly hear the sirens of the Joe police coming. You better make a run for it.
|
Response to bluewater (Original post)
Tue Nov 2, 2021, 06:11 PM
Meowmee (5,163 posts)
77. He made himself beholden coal interests a long time ago
He is really an r but not right wing enough now to run as one. It is a sorry state of affairs and it has been for many years. I see no way to correct it. The system is deeply flawed on so many levels.
|