Glenn Youngkin's victory proves white ignorance is a powerful weapon
From the outset, it was clear Youngkin would need fervent support from the state’s conservative base, along with the backing of some white voters in Democratic-leaning areas like Loudoun County, to win the race.
Ultimately, his campaign settled on a game plan that seemed to resonate deeply with white voters in Virginia: targeting school lesson plans that address inequality and social justice. Youngkin adopted the conservative strategy of falsely grouping these lesson plans under the label of “critical race theory,” and he promised to ban such teachings “on day one” if elected. Critical race theory is a college-level field of study that’s not taught in Virginia K-12 schools, but it’s become a catchall phrase for intellectually lazy people — many of them white — who want to stigmatize any discussion about American racism.
In the final weeks of his campaign, Youngkin focused almost exclusively on attacking lesson plans about inequality. He hosted multiple “Parents Matter” rallies, where attendees could gather to express outrage over school curricula. And last week, his campaign released an ad featuring a white mother who fought to have “Beloved,” Toni Morrison’s Pulitzer Prize-winning novel about slavery, banned from her son’s school district.
The Youngkin campaign discovered that this contingent of angry, willfully ignorant white people was the key ingredient needed to elect a GOP governor in Virginia for the first time since 2009. We can expect more Republicans to try the same gambit as we inch closer to next year’s consequential midterm elections.
https://www.msnbc.com/the-reidout/reidout-blog/glenn-youngkin-wins-virginia-governor-race-rcna4316
= new reply since forum marked as read
most of the nation, including in SoCal where we lived. In most places independent doesn't mean independent thinking; Pew says almost all align reliably right or left but average less strongly and are less likely to vote at all.
Sigh. I sometimes wish we'd never left West Hollywood. But not because most were apolitical. 
Oh, Perot! He was a hot topic, mostly fun, though things could get contentious. "It's simple, folks!" When I saw his name I smiled, but I think maybe he was a precursor of the tRump phenomenon. His populist (!) campaign attacked both parties (!), of course, but he was strongly conservative and definitely authoritarian (!!), so no surprise that, though he drew some Democrats (!), he did a lot better among conservatives we knew then and are sadly no longer friends with. All like tRump.
One of my husband's friends, who insisted there was no one to vote for after Perot pulled out because both parties stank, went on to become an even more passionate naderite and we lost track of each other. He probably dumped us for cause also. 
Oh, well. 
