Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge in Rittenhouse case takes a break during the trial to complain about media coverage of his..
Link to tweet
Tweet text:
Ron Filipkowski
@RonFilipkowski
In another bizarre move, the Judge in the Rittenhouse case takes a break during the trial to complain about media coverage of his rulings.
1:09 PM · Nov 3, 2021
Ron Filipkowski
@RonFilipkowski
In another bizarre move, the Judge in the Rittenhouse case takes a break during the trial to complain about media coverage of his rulings.
1:09 PM · Nov 3, 2021
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
13 replies, 939 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
13 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge in Rittenhouse case takes a break during the trial to complain about media coverage of his.. (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Nov 2021
OP
turbinetree
(24,710 posts)1. That's what the first amendment is about....you know from law school
sakabatou
(42,170 posts)2. Oh, cry me a river, judge!
spicysista
(1,663 posts)3. Wow!
You can't make up this stuff!
Hav
(5,969 posts)4. Is that remotely normal for judges to do?
Aren't there other venues to do that if he really needs to voice his frustration about what someone in the media said? This trial isn't there for him to amplify his views.
I wasn't really concerned about that use of the word victim decision but this seems really strange.
lame54
(35,313 posts)12. It's not the victim part it's the looter part
Hassler
(3,384 posts)5. Oh brother, another tRumpy narcissist.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)6. It's not clear from this clip
Was Judge Thinskin saying this in the presence of the jury?
Nevilledog
(51,170 posts)7. Don't think so......pretty sure away from jury.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)8. One certainly hopes so
Because the motion for a mistrial would arrive with burn marks from spontaneous near-combustion.
Nevilledog
(51,170 posts)9. Absolutely
UTUSN
(70,725 posts)10. This freak needs to go!
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)11. Most judges I've known take criticism really badly. They sort of lose
touch with the real world. Normally they expect and get a lot of deference.
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)13. How old is this idiot? nt