Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Takket

(21,645 posts)
Sat Nov 6, 2021, 04:50 PM Nov 2021

5th circuit "stays" enforcement of Biden's vaccine or test mandate for employers

WASHINGTON, Nov 6 (Reuters) - A U.S. federal appeals court issued a stay Saturday freezing the Biden administration's efforts to require workers at U.S. companies with at least 100 employees be vaccinated against COVID-19 or be tested weekly, citing "grave statutory and constitutional" issues with the rule.

The ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit comes after numerous Republican-led states filed legal challenges against the new rule, which is set to take effect on Jan 4.

In a statement, Solicitor of Labor Seema Nanda said the Labor Department was "confident in its legal authority" to issue the rule, which will be enforced by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

"The Occupational Safety and Health Act explicitly gives OSHA the authority to act quickly in an emergency where the agency finds that workers are subjected to a grave danger and a new standard is necessary to protect them," she said. "We are fully prepared to defend this standard in court.”

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-federal-appeals-court-issues-stay-bidens-vaccine-rule-us-companies-2021-11-06/

I don't know what "constitutional" issues there could be. The right wants to call this a "vaccine mandate" but it is not. Those that do not want to be vaccinated have the option of being tested weekly, so no one is being held down and forced to take a vaccine they do not want.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
5th circuit "stays" enforcement of Biden's vaccine or test mandate for employers (Original Post) Takket Nov 2021 OP
Apparently some just want the right to die from COVID-19 and possibly take others with them. RKP5637 Nov 2021 #1
It's that whole "take others with them" thing that is... dchill Nov 2021 #2
Exactly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! n/t RKP5637 Nov 2021 #6
Not a fan of the 5th Circuit. Dustlawyer Nov 2021 #3
Texas Louisiana Mississippi underpants Nov 2021 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Bleacher Creature Nov 2021 #5
There's a reason wingnuts refer to it as the "Friendly Fifth". 11 Bravo Nov 2021 #7
SCOTUS has already ruled in the affirmative on a vaccine mandate., Historic NY Nov 2021 #8
Not on this one. onenote Nov 2021 #9
Correct, they ruled that individual states have the authority madville Nov 2021 #12
These judges are guilty of murder. triron Nov 2021 #10
From Prof. Tribe LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2021 #11

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
1. Apparently some just want the right to die from COVID-19 and possibly take others with them.
Sat Nov 6, 2021, 04:55 PM
Nov 2021

I wonder what other vaccines they have avoided and are walking disease repositories!

dchill

(38,565 posts)
2. It's that whole "take others with them" thing that is...
Sat Nov 6, 2021, 05:04 PM
Nov 2021

... definitely not a Constitutional right.

Dustlawyer

(10,497 posts)
3. Not a fan of the 5th Circuit.
Sat Nov 6, 2021, 05:04 PM
Nov 2021

When it is an individual vs. a corporation they rule in favor of the corporation almost 95% of the time.

Response to Takket (Original post)

onenote

(42,782 posts)
9. Not on this one.
Sat Nov 6, 2021, 06:18 PM
Nov 2021

It has never, to my knowledge, ruled that the federal government has the constitutional or statutory authority to impose a vaccination mandate.

madville

(7,412 posts)
12. Correct, they ruled that individual states have the authority
Sun Nov 7, 2021, 09:50 PM
Nov 2021

Nothing about the Federal government having something equivalent.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»5th circuit "stays" enfor...